United States - MLSTQL StadiumData current as of August 30, 2026

FC Cincinnati vs New York City: match statistics

FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati
2 : 1half-time 1:1
New York City crest
New York City

FC Cincinnati vs New York City: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FC Cincinnati played against New York City in MLS (United States). The game was played on August 19, 2026. Venue: TQL Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

FC Cincinnati has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. New York City has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

FC Cincinnati scores 2.42 goals per game and allows 2.37. New York City scores 1.74 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 79% of FC Cincinnati's games and 68% of New York City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 58%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FC Cincinnati has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.37 per game. FC Cincinnati takes 13.7 shots per game, while New York City takes 11.7.

First-half and second-half trends

FC Cincinnati leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 1.32 goals per game after halftime. New York City leads at halftime in 47% and scores 0.68 after halftime.

When the teams score

FC Cincinnati's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). For New York City, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 8.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FC Cincinnati have a clear home advantage, winning 67% of their matches and averaging 3.11 goals per game, while New York City score just 1.00 goal per away match. The hosts create significantly more danger, averaging 15.78 shots and 6.44 shots on target, compared with the visitors’ 8.75 shots and 3.63 shots on target. The difference is also reflected in the quality of chances, with Cincinnati averaging 1.72 xG at home, while NYC manage just 1.12 away from home; the visitors have failed to score in 25% of their away matches. However, the hosts’ defense is vulnerable to mistakes, conceding 2.11 goals per home match, giving New York City a realistic chance to score. Cincinnati’s superior recent form, with 3 wins and 11 goals in their last five matches, nevertheless points to a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is clearly supported by the season results: FC Cincinnati have landed this outcome in 70% of their matches, while New York City have done so in 63%, compared with the league average of 61%. In their last five matches, both teams recorded BTTS in as many as 80% of cases, averaging 2.2 goals scored by the hosts and 1.6 by the visitors. Cincinnati conceded 1.4 goals per match during this period, while New York City conceded 1.2, with against-xG figures of 1.61 and 1.49 respectively, indicating regularly allowed goal-scoring opportunities. The hosts boast a strong attack, averaging 2.3 goals and 5.9 shots on target per match, while the visitors should be able to exploit Cincinnati’s defense, which has kept a clean sheet in only 20% of matches. The main risk to this pick is New York City’s lower season-long attacking output of 1.0 goals per match; however, their current scoring form and both sides’ weak clean-sheet records support BTTS.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

FC Cincinnati score an average of 2.3 goals per match, while New York City concede 1.13 goals, with the hosts creating chances worth an average of 1.56 xG. The visitors have lower attacking potential at 1.12 xG, but Cincinnati’s defense allows opponents 1.32 xG, raising their projected total to around 1.25 goals. In their last five matches, both teams recorded games with at least three goals in 80% and 60% of cases, respectively, while both sides have regularly scored and conceded, achieving 80% of matches with goals for both teams. The Over 1.5 goals line also has the strongest support in the season data: it has been surpassed in 100% of Cincinnati’s matches and 75% of New York City’s. The projected total of 2.83 goals is significantly above the 1.5 threshold, making the over on this line the most likely selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FC Cincinnati have a clear first-half advantage: they led at the break in 50% of their matches, averaging 1.4 goals and collecting 1.9 points per match before half-time. New York City were trailing after 45 minutes in as many as 50% of their games, while their average attacking output in this phase is only 0.5 goals, reinforcing the scenario of a home lead. Cincinnati’s advantage should persist after the break, as they average 5.9 shots on target compared with their opponents’ 3.63, while their xG stands at 1.56 versus 1.12 for the visitors. The hosts score an average of 2.3 goals per match, whereas NYC average 1.0, making a Cincinnati lead at half-time followed by a full-time win the most likely outcome: 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
FC CincinnatiNew York City
14Shots16
FC CincinnatiNew York City
6Shots on target8
FC CincinnatiNew York City
1.52xG1.83
FC CincinnatiNew York City
2Corners5
FC CincinnatiNew York City
28Dangerous attacks36
FC CincinnatiNew York City
10Fouls9
FC CincinnatiNew York City
3Cards3
FC CincinnatiNew York City

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FC CincinnatiNew York City
2.42Goals scored / game1.74
FC CincinnatiNew York City
2.37Goals allowed / game1.42
FC CincinnatiNew York City
49%Average possession55%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
5.79Shots on target / game4.84
FC CincinnatiNew York City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.68Shots per game11.74
FC CincinnatiNew York City
5.79Shots on target4.84
FC CincinnatiNew York City
17.7%Shot conversion14.8%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
49%Possession55%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
1.57xG for1.37
FC CincinnatiNew York City
1.82xG against1.42
FC CincinnatiNew York City

Shooting quality

FC Cincinnati: Efficient finishingNew York City: Efficient finishing
FC CincinnatiNew York City
Accuracy (shots on target)42%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FC Cincinnati is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.4 pts / game - New York City

FC Cincinnati
WWLWD
Season result split
37% W32% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-6
1.42 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
New York City
LWWDL
Season result split
37% W26% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-7
1.37 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FC Cincinnati is 39% better for: goals scored per game.

2.42 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.74 goals / game - New York City

New York City is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.37 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.42 goals / game - New York City

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 89% of games (17 of 19 meczów), while New York City keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 meczów).

New York City scoring profile: very strong

New York City scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 meczów), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 meczów).

46Goals scored (season)33
FC CincinnatiNew York City
45Goals conceded (season)27
FC CincinnatiNew York City
4.79Average goals per game3.16
FC CincinnatiNew York City
16Goals scored (last 5)9
FC CincinnatiNew York City
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
FC CincinnatiNew York City

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal84%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
68%2 goals47%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
47%3 goals26%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
26%4 goals11%
FC CincinnatiNew York City

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal84%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
68%2 goals37%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
42%3 goals16%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
21%4 goals5%
FC CincinnatiNew York City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

63%BTTS at half-time32%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
47%BTTS in both halves11%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
53%Scored in both halves37%
FC CincinnatiNew York City

BTTS and goal count

68%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
100%BTTS - last 5100%
FC CincinnatiNew York City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time89%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
74%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
42%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
FC CincinnatiNew York City

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
68%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
47%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
FC CincinnatiNew York City

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

New York City is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.68 pts / game - New York City

FC Cincinnati - half-time state
26% leading47% draw26% trailing
New York City - half-time state
47% leading26% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per game (1st half)1.68
FC CincinnatiNew York City
1.11Goals scored (1st half)1.05
FC CincinnatiNew York City
1.05Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
FC CincinnatiNew York City
2.16Average goals (1st half)1.63
FC CincinnatiNew York City
37%Clean sheet before half-time42%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
21%No goal before half-time37%
FC CincinnatiNew York City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per game (2nd half)1.16
FC CincinnatiNew York City
1.32Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
FC CincinnatiNew York City
1.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
FC CincinnatiNew York City
2.63Average goals (2nd half)1.53
FC CincinnatiNew York City
21%Clean sheet after half-time47%
FC CincinnatiNew York City
37%No goal after half-time42%
FC CincinnatiNew York City

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

37% W26% R37% P
24
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

New York City - second-half results

26% W37% R37% P
32
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 37%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FC Cincinnati - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.60
Goals scored / game1.61.6
Goals allowed / game1.20.8
Average goals per game2.82.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 8
New York City - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.200.60
Goals scored / game1.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game2.21.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%80%
Goal difference+5-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
9
16-30
13
8
31-45
6
11
46-60
3
4
61-75
16
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

New York City
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
8
4
16-30
7
5
31-45
6
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.98
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
124%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
74%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+101%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.85
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
177%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

New York City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

FC CincinnatiLigaNew York City
Average goals per game 4.793.20 3.16
Both teams scored 79%62% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%61% 58%
Clean sheets 11%21% 16%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 89%
Goal after half-time 89%81% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.86
Home goals / game
1.34
Away goals / game
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC CincinnatiGoalKenji Mboma DemAssist: Ahoueke Denkey
  2. FC CincinnatiYellow cardMatt Miazga
  3. New York CityYellow cardKeaton Alexander Parks
  4. FC CincinnatiYellow cardObinna Nwobodo
  5. New York CityYellow cardLuighi Hanri Sousa Santos
  6. New York CityYellow cardNicolás Ezequiel Fernández Mercau
  7. New York CitySubstitutionOn: Talles Magno Bacelar MartinsOff: Agustin Ojeda
  8. FC CincinnatiYellow cardSamuel Gidi
  9. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Brian AnungaOff: Kyle Smith

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from FC Cincinnati's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against New York City. Games average 8.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs New York City?

The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 2:1 New York City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs New York City?

FC Cincinnati score 2.42 goals per game on average and New York City 1.74. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 79% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 68% of New York City's.

What form are FC Cincinnati and New York City in?

Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and New York City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs New York City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.