FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders: match statistics
FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FC Cincinnati played against Seattle Sounders in MLS (United States). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Venue: TQL Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
FC Cincinnati has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Seattle Sounders has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
FC Cincinnati scores 2.40 goals per game and allows 2.30. Seattle Sounders scores 1.11 and allows 1.37. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 80% of FC Cincinnati's games and 53% of Seattle Sounders's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 42%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FC Cincinnati has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.55 per game. FC Cincinnati takes 13.7 shots per game, while Seattle Sounders takes 13.1.
First-half and second-half trends
FC Cincinnati leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.30 goals per game after halftime. Seattle Sounders leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.58 after halftime.
When the teams score
FC Cincinnati's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). For Seattle Sounders, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Cincinnati are significantly stronger at home, winning 67% of their matches and averaging 3.11 goals per game, while Seattle score just 0.70 goals away from home. The hosts average 15.78 shots, including 6.44 on target, compared with the visitors’ 11.4 attempts and 3.9 shots on target, while their conversion rate stands at an impressive 20%, compared with just 6% for Seattle. Cincinnati have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals in that span, whereas the Sounders have lost 4 of their last 5 games, scoring only 5 goals. The hosts concede an average of 2.11 goals at home, so Seattle may be able to exploit the spaces, but their 30% of away matches without scoring limits their chances of an upset. Cincinnati’s superiority in chance creation, supported by an xG of 1.72 compared with Seattle’s 1.38 away from home, points to a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
FC Cincinnati have strong foundations for scoring: they average 1.63 goals, rising to 2.20 across their last 5 matches, with an xG of 1.67. During this period, Seattle conceded an average of 1.80 goals, while their average xG conceded increased to a very high 2.51, so the hosts should create plenty of chances. The signal is less clear for the visitors, as they score only 0.70 goals per game this season and failed to score in 30% of their matches. However, Cincinnati have kept a clean sheet in just 13% of their games and concede an average of 1.75 goals, meaning Seattle should be able to exploit the hosts’ defensive gaps. BTTS - Yes occurred in 80% of Cincinnati’s last five matches, compared with the league average of 62%, so the scenario of both teams scoring holds a moderate edge.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
FC Cincinnati have averaged 2.2 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Seattle have conceded 1.8 goals per game during this period, with an exceptionally high xG against them of 2.51. The hosts are also creating chances consistently: their average xG stands at 1.70, with 14.5 shots and 5.63 shots on target per match, while Seattle’s defense allows an average of 1.63 xG. Seattle score just 0.70 goals per game this season, but their poor finishing does not rule out a goal against a Cincinnati defense that concedes 1.75 goals on average and keeps a clean sheet in just 13% of matches. The 1.5 line has the strongest coverage: at least 2 goals were scored in all of Cincinnati’s matches and in 40% of Seattle’s games, while the current form of both teams further raises the projection to 2.95 goals. Over 2.5 is also possible, but Seattle’s season profile—with 70% of matches finishing below this line—makes Over 1.5 clearly the safer choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
FC Cincinnati are in clearly better form, having won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.2 goals and conceding just 1.2, while Seattle have lost 4 of their last 5 games, conceding an average of 1.8 goals. The hosts were leading at the break in 4 of their last 5 appearances, scoring an average of 1.2 goals before half-time and allowing their opponents just 0.4. Seattle score only 0.7 goals per away match on average, while their shot conversion rate stands at 6%, compared with 11% for Cincinnati. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG is 1.70, while Seattle’s opponents average 1.63 xG. The scenario of Cincinnati leading at half-time and maintaining their winning position is therefore the strongest-supported HT/FT outcome, backed by both their current form and their attacking superiority.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FC Cincinnati | Seattle Sounders | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Cincinnati is 116% better for: goals scored per game.
2.4 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.11 goals / game - Seattle Sounders
Seattle Sounders is 68% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.3 goals / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.37 goals / game - Seattle Sounders
FC Cincinnati scores in 90% of games (18 of 20 meczów), while Seattle Sounders keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 meczów).
Seattle Sounders scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FC Cincinnati
Over / Under - Seattle Sounders
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FC Cincinnati is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - FC Cincinnati · 1.16 pts / game - Seattle Sounders
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FC Cincinnati - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Seattle Sounders - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FC Cincinnati
Seattle Sounders
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| FC Cincinnati | Liga | Seattle Sounders | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.70 | 3.19 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 62% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 61% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 21% | ▲ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 76% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 81% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Seattle SoundersYellow cardRyan Sailor
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders?
The MLS match finished FC Cincinnati 1:1 Seattle Sounders. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders?
FC Cincinnati score 2.40 goals per game on average and Seattle Sounders 1.11. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 80% of FC Cincinnati's matches and 53% of Seattle Sounders's.
What form are FC Cincinnati and Seattle Sounders in?
Over the last 5 games FC Cincinnati have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Seattle Sounders 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders?
The statistical background for FC Cincinnati vs Seattle Sounders — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


