FCSB vs Petrolul 52: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FCSB play Petrolul 52 in Liga I (Romania). The match date is 22 November 2025 at 19:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

FCSB: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Petrolul 52: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

FCSB scores 1.63 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Petrolul 52 scores 0.85 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FCSB 56%, Petrolul 52 49%. Over 2.5: FCSB 54%, Petrolul 52 28%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

FCSB has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.34. FCSB: 17.7 shots per match, Petrolul 52: 12.4.

Match halves

FCSB: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.76. Petrolul 52: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.54.

Goals by minute

FCSB: 0-15 (13 goals). Petrolul 52: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga I: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
FCSBPetrolul 52
24Shots7
FCSBPetrolul 52
4Shots on target2
FCSBPetrolul 52
1.85xG0.65
FCSBPetrolul 52
9Corners3
FCSBPetrolul 52
11Dangerous attacks10
FCSBPetrolul 52
10Fouls15
FCSBPetrolul 52
1Cards2
FCSBPetrolul 52

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.63Goals scored / match0.85
FCSBPetrolul 52
1.29Goals conceded / match1.18
FCSBPetrolul 52
59%Average possession47%
FCSBPetrolul 52
6.15Shots on target / match3.54
FCSBPetrolul 52

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.71Shots per match12.36
FCSBPetrolul 52
6.15Shots on target3.54
FCSBPetrolul 52
9.2%Shot conversion6.8%
FCSBPetrolul 52
59%Possession47%
FCSBPetrolul 52
1.94xG for1.34
FCSBPetrolul 52
1.18xG against1.48
FCSBPetrolul 52

Shooting quality

FCSB: DominantPetrolul 52: Balanced
FCSBPetrolul 52
Accuracy (shots on target)35%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FCSB is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - FCSB · 0.6 pts / match - Petrolul 52

FCSB
LDLWW
Season result split
46% W22% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-9-13
1.61 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-5-5
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.97Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Petrolul 52
DLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W36% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-14-16
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-8-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FCSB is 92% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - FCSB · 0.85 goals / match - Petrolul 52

Petrolul 52 is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - FCSB · 1.18 goals / match - Petrolul 52

FCSB scoring profile: very strong

FCSB scores in 78% of matches (32 of 41 matches), while Petrolul 52 keeps a clean sheet in 23% (9 of 39 matches).

Petrolul 52 scoring profile: strong

Petrolul 52 scores in 64% of matches (25 of 39 matches), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 29% (12 of 41 matches).

67Goals scored (season)33
FCSBPetrolul 52
53Goals conceded (season)46
FCSBPetrolul 52
2.93Average goals in match2.03
FCSBPetrolul 52
6Goals scored (last 5)5
FCSBPetrolul 52
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
FCSBPetrolul 52

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal64%
FCSBPetrolul 52
46%2 goals13%
FCSBPetrolul 52
24%3 goals5%
FCSBPetrolul 52
15%4 goals3%
FCSBPetrolul 52

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal77%
FCSBPetrolul 52
37%2 goals23%
FCSBPetrolul 52
17%3 goals10%
FCSBPetrolul 52
5%4 goals5%
FCSBPetrolul 52

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time10%
FCSBPetrolul 52
10%BTTS in both halves0%
FCSBPetrolul 52
34%Scored in both halves5%
FCSBPetrolul 52

BTTS and goal count

49%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
FCSBPetrolul 52
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
FCSBPetrolul 52
40%BTTS - last 5100%
FCSBPetrolul 52

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
FCSBPetrolul 52
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
FCSBPetrolul 52
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
FCSBPetrolul 52

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
FCSBPetrolul 52
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
FCSBPetrolul 52
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
FCSBPetrolul 52

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FCSB is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.66 pts / match - FCSB · 1 pts / match - Petrolul 52

FCSB - half-time state
44% leading34% draw22% trailing
Petrolul 52 - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.66Points per match (1st half)1
FCSBPetrolul 52
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.31
FCSBPetrolul 52
0.51Goals conceded (1st half)0.49
FCSBPetrolul 52
1.39Average goals (1st half)0.79
FCSBPetrolul 52
59%Clean sheet before half-time62%
FCSBPetrolul 52
39%No goal before half-time74%
FCSBPetrolul 52

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per match (2nd half)1.13
FCSBPetrolul 52
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
FCSBPetrolul 52
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
FCSBPetrolul 52
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.23
FCSBPetrolul 52
46%Clean sheet after half-time44%
FCSBPetrolul 52
49%No goal after half-time56%
FCSBPetrolul 52

FCSB - second-half results

27% W46% R27% P
68
Half-time points
36
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.66
PPG before half-time
Lead holding105%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Petrolul 52 - second-half results

26% W36% R38% P
39
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FCSB - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Petrolul 52 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FCSB
ScoredConceded
13
2
0-15
10
7
16-30
13
12
31-45
9
8
46-60
11
8
61-75
11
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Petrolul 52
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
3
8
16-30
6
7
31-45
4
4
46-60
9
11
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FCSB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Petrolul 52

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

FCSBLigaPetrolul 52
Average goals in match 2.932.53 2.03
Both teams scored 56%51% 49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%46% 28%
Clean sheets 29%28% 23%
Goal before half-time 73%67% 54%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): FCSB 2 - 0 - 0 Petrolul 52. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

SC Fotbal Club FCSB SA
3 : 1
ACS Petrolul 52 Ploieşti
ACS Petrolul 52 Ploieşti
0 : 1
SC Fotbal Club FCSB SA

FAQ

What was the result of FCSB vs Petrolul 52?

The Liga I match finished FCSB 1:1 Petrolul 52. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FCSB and Petrolul 52?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches FCSB won 2, Petrolul 52 won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FCSB vs Petrolul 52?

FCSB score 1.63 goals per game on average and Petrolul 52 0.85. The Liga I average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 56% of FCSB's matches and 49% of Petrolul 52's.

What form are FCSB and Petrolul 52 in?

Over the last 5 games FCSB have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Petrolul 52 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCSB vs Petrolul 52?

The statistical background for FCSB vs Petrolul 52 — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.