FCSB vs Petrolul 52: match statistics
FCSB vs Petrolul 52: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FCSB played against Petrolul 52 in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on September 14, 2026. Venue: Arena Naţională. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
FCSB has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Petrolul 52 has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
FCSB scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.25. Petrolul 52 scores 1.13 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of FCSB's games and 25% of Petrolul 52's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 38%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FCSB has the higher season xG average, 1.85 to 1.37 per game. FCSB takes 16.8 shots per game, while Petrolul 52 takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
FCSB leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Petrolul 52 leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
FCSB's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Petrolul 52, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FCSB have the stronger home advantage: they average 2 goals and an xG of 2.00 at home, while Petrolul 52 score 1.25 goals and generate an xG of 1.44 away from home. The hosts average 18.25 shots and 6.25 shots on target per match, comfortably exceeding the visitors’ 13.25 attempts and 4.5 shots on target. Petrolul’s away defense allows opponents an xG of 2.09 and concedes an average of 2 goals, while the team have also failed to keep a clean sheet in any away fixture. The visitors are, however, in decent overall form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches, although they have failed to score in 50% of their away games. FCSB are not flawless defensively either, conceding 1.75 goals per home match, but their advantage in chance creation and 58% possession points to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
FCSB have kept a clean sheet in 75% of their league matches and concede just 0.5 goals per game on average, which is the strongest argument against a Petrolul 52 goal. The hosts have conceded an average of 1.6 goals across their last five matches, but Petrolul have failed to score in 50% of their matches this season. FCSB’s season BTTS rate stands at 0%, compared with 50% for the visitors, while the league average is 44%, so the hosts’ profile clearly reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. Petrolul allow opponents a high xG of 2.09 and concede 2.0 goals per game on average, meaning FCSB should have good conditions to find the net, but a scenario in which at least one team fails to score remains slightly more likely. Recent form provides a partial argument for BTTS - Yes, with BTTS landing in 60% of FCSB’s last five matches and 40% of Petrolul’s; however, this does not outweigh the hosts’ solid defensive data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
FCSB have averaged 2.0 goals in their last five matches, while Petrolul have conceded 1.4 goals per game over the same period, clearly supporting the hosts’ attacking output. The visitors have failed to keep a clean sheet in any match this season and allow opponents an average of 2.0 goals, with a high against-xG of 2.09. Petrolul also produce 4.5 shots on target and 1.44 xG per match, while FCSB’s recent defensive average stands at 1.6 goals conceded. The Over 1.5 goals line looks the most reliable: at least two goals were scored in 50% of FCSB’s matches to date and 75% of Petrolul’s, while both teams scored at least one goal in 100% of their matches this season. Over 2.5 receives moderate support from recent form, but the fact that FCSB have had 0% of such matches across the entire season calls for greater caution with the higher line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
FCSB were leading at half-time in 3 of their 4 home matches so far, averaging 0.75 goals scored before the break and conceding none. Away from home, Petrolul concede as many as 1.25 goals per match before half-time, and in 2 of their 4 such appearances they went into the interval trailing. The hosts have won 75% of their home matches and kept a clean sheet in 75% of them, while Petrolul have failed to record a single away clean sheet and concede an average of 2.0 goals. Although Petrolul’s last five matches indicate better first-half form, with a 60% rate of leading at the break and a 5:1 goal difference, FCSB clearly benefit from the stronger home conditions. The most likely outcome is therefore an HT/FT 1/1 scenario, with FCSB exploiting their opponents’ defensive weaknesses before half-time and maintaining their lead until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FCSB | Petrolul 52 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Petrolul 52 is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - FCSB · 2.4 pts / game - Petrolul 52
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FCSB is 22% better for: goals scored per game.
1.38 goals / game - FCSB · 1.13 goals / game - Petrolul 52
FCSB scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 games), while Petrolul 52 keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).
Petrolul 52 scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 games), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FCSB
Over / Under - Petrolul 52
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Petrolul 52 is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - FCSB · 1.75 pts / game - Petrolul 52
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FCSB - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Petrolul 52 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FCSB
Petrolul 52
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| FCSB | Liga | Petrolul 52 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.63 | 2.53 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 31% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 64% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 74% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from FCSB's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Petrolul 52. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FCSB vs Petrolul 52?
The Liga I match finished FCSB 2:2 Petrolul 52. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FCSB and Petrolul 52?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches FCSB won 2, Petrolul 52 won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FCSB vs Petrolul 52?
FCSB score 1.38 goals per game on average and Petrolul 52 1.13. The Liga I average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 50% of FCSB's matches and 25% of Petrolul 52's.
What form are FCSB and Petrolul 52 in?
Over the last 5 games FCSB have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Petrolul 52 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCSB vs Petrolul 52?
The statistical background for FCSB vs Petrolul 52 — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.