Belgium - Pro LeagueData current as of September 11, 2026

FCV Dender EH vs Zulte-Waregem: match statistics

FCV Dender EH crest
FCV Dender EH
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Zulte-Waregem crest
Zulte-Waregem

FCV Dender EH vs Zulte-Waregem: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FCV Dender EH played against Zulte-Waregem in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on April 12, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

FCV Dender EH has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Zulte-Waregem has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

FCV Dender EH scores 0.81 goals per game and allows 1.65. Zulte-Waregem scores 1.29 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of FCV Dender EH's games and 61% of Zulte-Waregem's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 48%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Zulte-Waregem has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.26 per game. FCV Dender EH takes 10.8 shots per game, while Zulte-Waregem takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

FCV Dender EH leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.42 goals per game after halftime. Zulte-Waregem leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.68 after halftime.

When the teams score

FCV Dender EH's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Zulte-Waregem, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Pro League games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Zulte-Waregem holds a clear advantage in goal output: 40 goals this season versus 25 for FCV Dender EH, and the visitors average 1.27 goals per away match compared to 0.80 for the hosts at home. The visitors also display superior efficiency — conversion rate 12% versus 7% for the hosts, and a share of goalless matches of 27% vs 40%, which increases Zulte’s effectiveness in front of goal. Both teams, however, concede an average of 1.87 goals per game and have similar xG (1.26 for the visitors vs 1.29 for the hosts), suggesting a balanced match dynamic and raising the likelihood of a draw. In the last five matches both sides have scored 4 and conceded 7 goals, with the hosts averaging 1.0 point per game in that period versus 0.8 for the visitors, which slightly favors Dender. Considering the seasonal goal advantage and the visitors’ higher conversion, I back a Zulte win; implied probabilities are 18% for the home win, 36% for a draw and 46% for the away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes with a 70% probability versus 30% for No, because statistical signals strongly favor both teams scoring. Seasonal indicators show BTTS at 50% for Dender and 73% for Zulte-Waregem against a league average of 54%, providing a clear positive signal for Yes. xG analysis indicates the home side generate xG 1.54 per match versus xG allowed by Zulte at 1.6, while the visitors have xG 1.26 versus xG allowed by Dender at 1.4, meaning both teams create realistic scoring opportunities. In the last 5 fixtures both teams averaged 0.8 goals scored and conceded 1.4 goals, and Dender have xG against of 1.95 in those 5 matches while conceding 51 goals season-to-date versus 49 conceded by Zulte, highlighting vulnerability to goals. Additionally, hosts average 4.5 shots on target and 13.81 total shots, visitors 3.47 on target and 10.6 total, and clean sheet frequency is only 25% for Dender and 13% for Zulte, so a Goal/Goal scenario appears more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG: FCV Dender EH has xG_for 1.54 and Zulte-Waregem xG_against 1.60, yielding an expected 1.57 goals for the home side; the reverse combination xG_for_away 1.26 and xG_against_home 1.40 gives 1.33 for the visitors, totaling 2.90 goals. Seasonal metrics confirm a bias toward higher scores: Over 1.5 occurred in 69% of Dender’s matches and 87% of Zulte-Waregem’s matches (average 78%), while BTTS occurred in 50% and 73% of games respectively. Signals for the 2.5 line are mixed: only 38% of home matches and 60% of away matches finished above 2.5 (average ~49%), but the total xG of 2.90 and shot stats (home 13.81 and 4.5 SOT; away 10.6 and 3.47 SOT) increase the probability of Over 2.5. In the last 5 games both teams averaged 0.8 goals each (4 goals in 5 matches), and recent xG_against were 1.95 (home) and 1.20 (away), which limits the case for the 3.5 line. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (forecast Over 1.5 = 82%), moderate support for Over 2.5 (63%) and low for Over 3.5 (34%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time appears most likely — the home side record a half-time draw in 44% of matches and the visitors in 40%, while homes lead at the break in only 25% of cases and the visitors in 31%. After the break the home side show an advantage: they score on average 0.81 goals in second halves versus 0.53 for the visitors and average 1.44 points in second halves compared to 0.73 for Zulte-Waregem. Additionally the hosts have a higher xG of 1.54 versus 1.26 for the visitors, a better season points average 1.38 vs 0.73 and a higher win rate 38% vs 13%, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround after the break. The visitors, however, score more often before half-time (25 HT goals and 0.73 HT goals per game vs 17 and 0.5 for the hosts), so the strongest signal is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
15Shots24
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
5Shots on target9
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
1.58xG2.64
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
2Corners6
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
39Dangerous attacks68
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
12Fouls9
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
2Cards0
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
0.81Goals scored / game1.29
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
1.65Goals allowed / game1.58
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
47%Average possession48%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
3.84Shots on target / game4
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.77Shots per game12.26
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
3.84Shots on target4
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
7.5%Shot conversion10.5%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
47%Possession48%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
1.26xG for1.41
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
1.72xG against1.5
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

Shooting quality

FCV Dender EH: BalancedZulte-Waregem: Balanced
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FCV Dender EH is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 0.8 pts / game - Zulte-Waregem

FCV Dender EH
DDLLW
Season result split
13% W32% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-10-17
0.71 pts / game · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-9
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Zulte-Waregem
LLLWD
Season result split
26% W29% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-14
1.06 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zulte-Waregem is 59% better for: goals scored per game.

0.81 goals / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.29 goals / game - Zulte-Waregem

FCV Dender EH scoring profile: strong

FCV Dender EH scores in 61% of games (19 of 31 meczów), while Zulte-Waregem keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 31 meczów).

Zulte-Waregem scoring profile: very strong

Zulte-Waregem scores in 74% of games (23 of 31 meczów), while FCV Dender EH keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 31 meczów).

25Goals scored (season)40
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
51Goals conceded (season)49
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
2.45Average goals per game2.87
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
4Goals scored (last 5)4
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal74%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
19%2 goals42%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
0%3 goals10%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
0%4 goals3%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal81%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
52%2 goals48%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
23%3 goals19%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
6%4 goals10%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time23%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
3%BTTS in both halves6%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
13%Scored in both halves13%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
40%BTTS - last 540%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zulte-Waregem is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - FCV Dender EH · 1.1 pts / game - Zulte-Waregem

FCV Dender EH - half-time state
16% leading52% draw32% trailing
Zulte-Waregem - half-time state
23% leading42% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.1
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.61
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.74
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
1Average goals (1st half)1.35
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
52%Clean sheet before half-time45%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
65%No goal before half-time58%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

After half-time (2nd half)

0.84Points per game (2nd half)1.1
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.52
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
35%Clean sheet after half-time32%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem
61%No goal after half-time55%
FCV Dender EHZulte-Waregem

FCV Dender EH - second-half results

19% W26% D55% L
31
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 13%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Zulte-Waregem - second-half results

26% W32% D42% L
34
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FCV Dender EH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.80
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Zulte-Waregem - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FCV Dender EH
ScoredConceded
7
9
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
7
46-60
3
11
61-75
6
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Zulte-Waregem
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
8
4
16-30
8
11
31-45
5
7
46-60
4
7
61-75
12
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FCV Dender EH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
58%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 28% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Zulte-Waregem

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

FCV Dender EHLigaZulte-Waregem
Average goals per game 2.452.62 2.87
Both teams scored 55%54% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%47% 48%
Clean sheets 19%27% 19%
Goal before half-time 61%72% 74%
Goal after half-time 81%75% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.23
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FCV Dender EHGoalDávid HrnčárAssist: Malcolm Viltard
  2. FCV Dender EHYellow cardDávid Hrnčár
  3. Zulte-WaregemGoalJoseph Amankwaah OpokuAssist: Anosike Ementa
  4. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: David ToshevskiOff: Mohamed Berte
  5. Zulte-WaregemGoalJoseph Amankwaah OpokuAssist: Jeppe Erenbjerg
  6. FCV Dender EHSubstitutionOn: Jordan AttahOff: Malcolm Viltard
  7. FCV Dender EHYellow cardDavid Toshevski
  8. Zulte-WaregemSubstitutionOn: Yannick CappelleOff: Marley Ake
  9. Zulte-WaregemSubstitutionOn: Tobias HedlOff: Malick Mbaye

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jasper VergooteMatches officiated: 24
3.71Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 246%Home wins13%Draws42%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from FCV Dender EH's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Zulte-Waregem. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

SV Zulte-Waregem
1 : 0
FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem
FC Verbroedering Dender Eendracht Hekelgem
2 : 2
SV Zulte-Waregem

FAQ

What was the result of FCV Dender EH vs Zulte-Waregem?

The Pro League match finished FCV Dender EH 1:2 Zulte-Waregem. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FCV Dender EH and Zulte-Waregem?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches FCV Dender EH won 0, Zulte-Waregem won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FCV Dender EH vs Zulte-Waregem?

FCV Dender EH score 0.81 goals per game on average and Zulte-Waregem 1.29. The Pro League average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 55% of FCV Dender EH's matches and 61% of Zulte-Waregem's.

What form are FCV Dender EH and Zulte-Waregem in?

Over the last 5 games FCV Dender EH have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Zulte-Waregem 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FCV Dender EH vs Zulte-Waregem?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for FCV Dender EH vs Zulte-Waregem: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.