El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

Firpo vs Cacahuatique: match statistics

Firpo crest
Firpo
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Cacahuatique crest
Cacahuatique

Firpo vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Firpo play Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 2 April 2026 at 03:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Firpo: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Cacahuatique: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Firpo scores 1.88 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Cacahuatique scores 1.18 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Firpo 57%, Cacahuatique 57%. Over 2.5: Firpo 53%, Cacahuatique 55%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Firpo has higher xG: 1.73 vs 1.40. Firpo: 11.2 shots per match, Cacahuatique: 8.9.

Match halves

Firpo: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.24. Cacahuatique: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Firpo: 61-75 (26 goals). Cacahuatique: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 3-0-0. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Firpo holds a clear advantage across key metrics: at home they average 1.71 goals and 2.01 xG, while Cacahuatique on the road averages 1.45 goals and 1.32 xG. The hosts create significantly more chances — 12.81 shots and 5.9 shots on target per game versus 8.5 and 4.65 for the visitors — which translates into a 67% home win rate and a +20 goal difference at their stadium. Defensively Firpo is more reliable: they concede 0.76 goals at home on average and keep a clean sheet in 52% of matches, whereas Cacahuatique concedes 1.2 goals away and records 35% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches Firpo have won 3 of 5 (form: llwww) and average 1.8 points per game, while the visitors have 2 wins in 5 and average 1.4 points per game (form: ldlww). The visitors have a higher shot-to-goal conversion rate (17% vs 13%) and a lower share of goalless matches (15% vs 24%), so they can be dangerous, but the superiority in xG and number of created chances favors a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
FirpoCacahuatique
10Shots6
FirpoCacahuatique
2Shots on target2
FirpoCacahuatique
1.56xG1.08
FirpoCacahuatique
10Corners4
FirpoCacahuatique
108Dangerous attacks78
FirpoCacahuatique
-1Fouls-1
FirpoCacahuatique
-1Cards-1
FirpoCacahuatique

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.88Goals scored / match1.18
FirpoCacahuatique
1.04Goals conceded / match1.37
FirpoCacahuatique
52%Average possession47%
FirpoCacahuatique
4.96Shots on target / match4.27
FirpoCacahuatique

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.24Shots per match8.88
FirpoCacahuatique
4.96Shots on target4.27
FirpoCacahuatique
16.8%Shot conversion13.3%
FirpoCacahuatique
52%Possession47%
FirpoCacahuatique
1.73xG for1.4
FirpoCacahuatique
1.19xG against1.57
FirpoCacahuatique

Shooting quality

Firpo: Efficient finishingCacahuatique: Counter-attacking
FirpoCacahuatique
Accuracy (shots on target)44%48%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Firpo
DDDWL
Season result split
61% W24% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
31-12-8
2.06 pts / match · goal difference +43
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
15-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Cacahuatique
LDWDD
Season result split
29% W31% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-15-20
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-5-9
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Firpo is 59% better for: goals scored per match.

1.88 goals / match - Firpo · 1.18 goals / match - Cacahuatique

Firpo is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.04 goals / match - Firpo · 1.37 goals / match - Cacahuatique

Firpo scoring profile: very strong

Firpo scores in 82% of matches (42 of 51 matches), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 29% (14 of 49 matches).

Cacahuatique scoring profile: strong

Cacahuatique scores in 73% of matches (36 of 49 matches), while Firpo keeps a clean sheet in 31% (16 of 51 matches).

96Goals scored (season)58
FirpoCacahuatique
53Goals conceded (season)67
FirpoCacahuatique
2.92Average goals in match2.55
FirpoCacahuatique
5Goals scored (last 5)5
FirpoCacahuatique
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
FirpoCacahuatique

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal73%
FirpoCacahuatique
57%2 goals24%
FirpoCacahuatique
39%3 goals12%
FirpoCacahuatique
6%4 goals4%
FirpoCacahuatique

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal71%
FirpoCacahuatique
25%2 goals41%
FirpoCacahuatique
6%3 goals18%
FirpoCacahuatique
2%4 goals4%
FirpoCacahuatique

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time12%
FirpoCacahuatique
6%BTTS in both halves0%
FirpoCacahuatique
39%Scored in both halves12%
FirpoCacahuatique

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
FirpoCacahuatique
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
FirpoCacahuatique
80%BTTS - last 560%
FirpoCacahuatique

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
FirpoCacahuatique
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
FirpoCacahuatique
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
FirpoCacahuatique

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
FirpoCacahuatique
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
FirpoCacahuatique
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
FirpoCacahuatique

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Firpo - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing
Cacahuatique - half-time state
33% leading45% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.43
FirpoCacahuatique
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.63
FirpoCacahuatique
0.49Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
FirpoCacahuatique
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.08
FirpoCacahuatique
65%Clean sheet before half-time69%
FirpoCacahuatique
51%No goal before half-time55%
FirpoCacahuatique

After half-time (2nd half)

2.12Points per match (2nd half)1.08
FirpoCacahuatique
1.24Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
FirpoCacahuatique
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
FirpoCacahuatique
1.78Average goals (2nd half)1.47
FirpoCacahuatique
55%Clean sheet after half-time41%
FirpoCacahuatique
27%No goal after half-time59%
FirpoCacahuatique

Firpo - second-half results

63% W24% R14% P
75
Half-time points
33
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
108
Second-half points
+35
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cacahuatique - second-half results

27% W29% R45% P
70
Half-time points
31
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Firpo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cacahuatique - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Firpo
ScoredConceded
12
8
0-15
9
9
16-30
12
8
31-45
13
12
46-60
26
9
61-75
24
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (26 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +17 - wins late phases.

Cacahuatique
ScoredConceded
11
8
0-15
12
6
16-30
8
8
31-45
7
13
46-60
8
15
61-75
12
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Firpo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Cacahuatique

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

FirpoLigaCacahuatique
Average goals in match 2.922.67 2.55
Both teams scored 57%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%50% 55%
Clean sheets 31%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 67%68% 63%
Goal after half-time 86%78% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Firpo 3 - 0 - 0 Cacahuatique. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Cacahuatique
1 : 3
Firpo
Firpo
3 : 0
Cacahuatique
Cacahuatique
1 : 3
Firpo

FAQ

What was the result of Firpo vs Cacahuatique?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Firpo 1:0 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Firpo and Cacahuatique?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Firpo won 3, Cacahuatique won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Firpo vs Cacahuatique?

Firpo score 1.88 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.18. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Firpo's matches and 57% of Cacahuatique's.

What form are Firpo and Cacahuatique in?

Over the last 5 games Firpo have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Cacahuatique 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Firpo vs Cacahuatique?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.