Fort Wayne vs Union Omaha: match statistics
Fort Wayne vs Union Omaha: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Fort Wayne played Union Omaha in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Fort Wayne: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Union Omaha: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Fort Wayne scores 1.47 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Union Omaha scores 1.61 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Fort Wayne 47%, Union Omaha 61%. Over 2.5: Fort Wayne 47%, Union Omaha 61%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Union Omaha has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.49. Fort Wayne: 13.0 shots per match, Union Omaha: 15.8.
Match halves
Fort Wayne: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.65. Union Omaha: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.11.
Goals by minute
Fort Wayne: 0-15 (6 goals). Union Omaha: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Fort Wayne to win ('1') because the hosts possess a clear defensive edge at home — conceding only 0.43 goals per game and keeping clean sheets in 71% of matches, while Union Omaha concedes 1.33 goals on average away and has yet to record an away clean sheet. In attack Fort Wayne score 1.86 goals per home game with xG 1.68 and 5.57 shots on target, whereas Union Omaha away average 1.11 goals, xG 1.58 and 4.44 shots on target; the hosts also display higher conversion (13% vs 8% for the visitors). Over the last 5 matches both teams are similar in goals scored (Fort Wayne 9, Union Omaha 10), but Fort Wayne’s form is 2 wins and 3 losses compared to the visitors’ 2-1-2, equating to 1.2 points per game for the hosts and 1.4 for the guests. Additionally Fort Wayne allows 1.24 xG at home while Union Omaha concede 1.67 xG on the road, suggesting the hosts better limit high-quality chances. Considering the defensive advantage, superior finishing and the home goal-difference (+10 for Fort Wayne vs -2 for Union Omaha away), I estimate the hosts’ win probability at around 60%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal BTTS signal is clear: Fort Wayne records BTTS in 67% of home matches, Union Omaha in 56%, and the league average is 55%, indicating a propensity for both-teams-to-score games. In the last 5 matches the signal intensifies — Fort Wayne has BTTS in 60% of their last five, while Union Omaha is at 80%, showing the visitors have recently been involved in Goal/Goal fixtures. Offensive metrics and xG corroborate this: Fort Wayne at home averages 18.44 shots (6.89 on target) with xG 2.17 and scores 2.11 goals, while Union has a season xG of 1.58 with 13.11 shots and 4.44 on target, but in the last 5 their xG is 2.03 and they average 2.0 goals, meaning both sides generate chances. There is, however, counter-risk to BTTS: Union have 0% clean sheets away and seasonally finish 44% of away games without scoring, yet Fort Wayne only has a 33% clean sheet rate at home, so clean sheets do not dominate the picture. In summary, considering 67% vs 56% seasonally, 60% vs 80% in the last 5, and Fort Wayne’s edge in xG and shot volume, I tip BTTS = Yes (78% vs 22%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate Fort Wayne will score about 1.92 goals (attacking xG 2.17 adjusted by opponent defensive xG 1.67), and Union Omaha about 1.33 goals (xG 1.58 vs Fort Wayne defensive xG 1.08), giving a combined ~3.25 expected goals. This season Fort Wayne have 89% of matches over 1.5 goals, Union Omaha 78%, and BTTS occurs in 67% and 56% of matches respectively, which strongly supports at least 2 goals. In their last 5 matches Fort Wayne scored 9 goals (1.8 avg), Union Omaha 10 goals (2.0 avg), and the over 2.5 rate was 100% for Fort Wayne and 80% for Union Omaha, which increases the chance of Over 2.5, albeit less decisively than Over 1.5. Additionally Fort Wayne average 18.44 shots with 6.89 on target and have an 11% conversion, Union Omaha 13.11 shots with 4.44 on target and 8% conversion, which raises scoring probability; therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (estimate: Over1.5 ~85%, Over2.5 ~66%, Over3.5 ~41%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I am projecting a half-time draw with Fort Wayne winning full-time (X/1). Fort Wayne holds a clear offensive advantage: they average 2.11 goals per match versus Union Omaha’s 1.11, register a higher xG (2.17 vs. 1.58) and record 6.89 shots on target compared to the visitors’ 4.44. Half-time statistics indicate a draw is most common — the home side have been level at the interval in 56% of matches and the away side in 67% — so I expect parity at the 45-minute mark. The decisive factor is the second half: Fort Wayne scores on average 1.78 goals in second halves and wins the second half in 78% of cases, which often produces a turnaround in their favour; Union Omaha manage only 0.44 goals and 22% second-half wins, so they seldom recover. Therefore I assign the X/1 scenario the highest probability at 36%, while draw/draw is assessed at 14% and a half-time home lead maintained to full-time (1/1) at 8%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Fort Wayne | Union Omaha | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fort Wayne is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Fort Wayne · 1.4 pts / match - Union Omaha
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Union Omaha is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.47 goals / match - Fort Wayne · 1.61 goals / match - Union Omaha
Fort Wayne is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Fort Wayne · 1.17 goals / match - Union Omaha
Fort Wayne scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Union Omaha keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).
Union Omaha scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Fort Wayne keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Fort Wayne
Over / Under — Union Omaha
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fort Wayne is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / match - Fort Wayne · 1.11 pts / match - Union Omaha
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fort Wayne - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 41%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Union Omaha - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +7 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Fort Wayne
Union Omaha
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Fort Wayne | Liga | Union Omaha | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.47 | 2.92 | ▼ 2.78 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 56% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 61% | • 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 25% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 70% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 78% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Fort Wayne vs Union Omaha?
The USL League One match finished Fort Wayne 0:2 Union Omaha. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Fort Wayne vs Union Omaha?
Fort Wayne score 1.47 goals per game on average and Union Omaha 1.61. The USL League One average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Fort Wayne's matches and 61% of Union Omaha's.
What form are Fort Wayne and Union Omaha in?
Over the last 5 games Fort Wayne have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Union Omaha 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fort Wayne vs Union Omaha?
The statistical background for Fort Wayne vs Union Omaha — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


