Denmark - SuperligaData current as of September 11, 2026

Fredericia vs Silkeborg: match statistics

Fredericia crest
Fredericia
4 : 1half-time 3:0
Silkeborg crest
Silkeborg

Fredericia vs Silkeborg: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Fredericia played against Silkeborg in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Final score: 4:1.

Recent form

Fredericia has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Silkeborg has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Fredericia scores 1.32 goals per game and allows 2.16. Silkeborg scores 1.29 and allows 2.03. Games in this league average 3.04 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 61% of Fredericia's games and 55% of Silkeborg's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 65%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Fredericia has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.34 per game. Fredericia takes 11.7 shots per game, while Silkeborg takes 11.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Fredericia leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. Silkeborg leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.55 after halftime.

When the teams score

Fredericia's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Silkeborg, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Superliga games average 3.04 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Silkeborg is the favorite based on form: in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (average 2.0 points per match), while Fredericia have not won any of their last 5 fixtures (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses, average 0.6 points per match). The visitors also show markedly better chance conversion — a 14% conversion rate away versus 8% for the home side, and Fredericia have 40% of home games without scoring compared to 27% for Silkeborg on the road. Defensively both teams are prone to conceding: Fredericia concede on average 2.13 goals at home (average xG against 1.90), Silkeborg 2.47 goals away (average xG against 2.02), however in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded 9 goals (1.8 per match) versus 11 conceded by the hosts (2.2 per match). Fredericia create slightly more quality chances at home (average xG 1.47 and 13.07 shots) than Silkeborg do away (xG 1.21 and 10.53 shots), but lower conversion and a higher share of scoreless games limit their realistic prospects. Considering Silkeborg’s better form and efficiency and the tendency for high-scoring games between these sides (average 3.2 goals in Fredericia’s matches and 3.93 in Silkeborg’s away games), I estimate the probabilities as: away win 55%, draw 25%, home win 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project BTTS - Yes at 68% probability because Silkeborg has a season BTTS rate of 67% versus Fredericia’s 44%, and both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches. The league average BTTS is 59% and clean sheets are rare: Fredericia kept a clean sheet in 13% of matches, Silkeborg only 7%, which raises the likelihood of goals from both sides. Fredericia posts xG 1.46 and averages 1.13 goals per match, while Silkeborg concedes 2.47 goals per match on average (xG against 2.02), meaning Fredericia creates chances against a vulnerable opponent. Countering this is the fact Fredericia failed to score in 50% of their season matches, but Silkeborg is more efficient (conversion 14% vs Fredericia 9%) and away fixtures feature 87% of Silkeborg’s matches with over 2.5 goals, which ultimately strengthens the BTTS signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The calculated expected goals are 1.74 for Fredericia and 1.46 for Silkeborg, giving a combined xG of 3.20 and suggesting a match around 3 goals. A Poisson model for total xG=3.20 yields probability of Over 1.5 goals at ~83% (at least 2 goals), Over 2.5 at ~62% (at least 3) and Over 3.5 at ~40% (at least 4). Seasonal data confirm a propensity for goals: Fredericia has Over 1.5 in 88% of matches, Silkeborg in 93%, and Silkeborg has Over 2.5 in 87% of fixtures, which further increases the chance of Over 2.5. Both-teams-to-score stats also support goals — Fredericia 44% and Silkeborg 67% on the season, with last 5-match averages of 1.4 and 1.8 goals respectively (combined 3.2). The strongest signal is Over 1.5 due to the high combined probability (~83%) and alignment of xG with seasonal indicators, therefore I recommend a bet on Over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Silkeborg has a clear form advantage: in the last 5 matches they have won 60% of games, whereas Fredericia have won none (60% vs 0%). In the last 5 matches Silkeborg led at the break in 40% of cases, and Fredericia only in 20%, while Fredericia were trailing at the break in 60% of matches (40% vs 20% vs 60%), suggesting the visitors are more often leading after 45 minutes. In second halves Silkeborg average 1.0 goal in the last 5 matches versus 0.6 for Fredericia and have won the second half in 60% of games (1.0 vs 0.6; 60% vs 20%), so the visitors have a greater chance to maintain or achieve a turnaround after the break. Seasonal numbers support the visitors’ effectiveness: Silkeborg score an average 1.47 goals with a 14% conversion rate compared to Fredericia’s 1.13 goals with a 9% conversion rate; despite Fredericia having a higher xG (1.46 vs 1.21), the hosts’ poorer finishing translates into lower chances of a Full-Time victory.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

60Possession (%)40
FredericiaSilkeborg
27Shots9
FredericiaSilkeborg
11Shots on target3
FredericiaSilkeborg
2.97xG1.01
FredericiaSilkeborg
4Corners6
FredericiaSilkeborg
70Dangerous attacks32
FredericiaSilkeborg
6Fouls3
FredericiaSilkeborg
1Cards1
FredericiaSilkeborg

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.32Goals scored / game1.29
FredericiaSilkeborg
2.16Goals allowed / game2.03
FredericiaSilkeborg
44%Average possession49%
FredericiaSilkeborg
3.94Shots on target / game4.61
FredericiaSilkeborg

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.68Shots per game11.52
FredericiaSilkeborg
3.94Shots on target4.61
FredericiaSilkeborg
11.3%Shot conversion11.2%
FredericiaSilkeborg
44%Possession49%
FredericiaSilkeborg
1.35xG for1.34
FredericiaSilkeborg
2.1xG against1.86
FredericiaSilkeborg

Shooting quality

Fredericia: BalancedSilkeborg: Balanced
FredericiaSilkeborg
Accuracy (shots on target)34%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Silkeborg is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Fredericia · 2 pts / game - Silkeborg

Fredericia
DDLDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
26% W23% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-16
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-8
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Silkeborg
DWWWL
Season result split
32% W19% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-15
1.16 pts / game · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-8
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Silkeborg is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.16 goals / game - Fredericia · 2.03 goals / game - Silkeborg

Fredericia scoring profile: very strong

Fredericia scores in 68% of games (21 of 31 meczów), while Silkeborg keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 31 meczów).

Silkeborg scoring profile: very strong

Silkeborg scores in 61% of games (19 of 31 meczów), while Fredericia keeps a clean sheet in 6% (2 of 31 meczów).

41Goals scored (season)40
FredericiaSilkeborg
67Goals conceded (season)63
FredericiaSilkeborg
3.48Average goals per game3.32
FredericiaSilkeborg
7Goals scored (last 5)9
FredericiaSilkeborg
11Goals conceded (last 5)9
FredericiaSilkeborg

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal61%
FredericiaSilkeborg
48%2 goals42%
FredericiaSilkeborg
16%3 goals23%
FredericiaSilkeborg
0%4 goals3%
FredericiaSilkeborg

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal90%
FredericiaSilkeborg
71%2 goals58%
FredericiaSilkeborg
39%3 goals26%
FredericiaSilkeborg
10%4 goals16%
FredericiaSilkeborg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time29%
FredericiaSilkeborg
6%BTTS in both halves13%
FredericiaSilkeborg
23%Scored in both halves26%
FredericiaSilkeborg

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
FredericiaSilkeborg
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
FredericiaSilkeborg
60%BTTS - last 560%
FredericiaSilkeborg

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time87%
FredericiaSilkeborg
65%Min. 2 goals before half-time55%
FredericiaSilkeborg
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time26%
FredericiaSilkeborg

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
FredericiaSilkeborg
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
FredericiaSilkeborg
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
FredericiaSilkeborg

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Silkeborg is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Fredericia · 1.16 pts / game - Silkeborg

Fredericia - half-time state
23% leading32% draw45% trailing
Silkeborg - half-time state
29% leading29% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.16
FredericiaSilkeborg
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.74
FredericiaSilkeborg
1.06Goals conceded (1st half)1.03
FredericiaSilkeborg
1.77Average goals (1st half)1.77
FredericiaSilkeborg
32%Clean sheet before half-time35%
FredericiaSilkeborg
52%No goal before half-time48%
FredericiaSilkeborg

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per game (2nd half)1.13
FredericiaSilkeborg
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
FredericiaSilkeborg
1.1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
FredericiaSilkeborg
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.55
FredericiaSilkeborg
29%Clean sheet after half-time35%
FredericiaSilkeborg
58%No goal after half-time65%
FredericiaSilkeborg

Fredericia - second-half results

23% W26% D52% L
31
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Silkeborg - second-half results

32% W16% D52% L
36
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Fredericia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game1.60.6
Average goals per game2.41.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Silkeborg - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.80
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.42.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Fredericia
ScoredConceded
6
11
0-15
9
8
16-30
7
14
31-45
5
10
46-60
4
8
61-75
10
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Silkeborg
ScoredConceded
7
9
0-15
8
11
16-30
8
12
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
11
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Fredericia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Silkeborg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

FredericiaLigaSilkeborg
Average goals per game 3.483.04 3.32
Both teams scored 61%59% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%60% 65%
Clean sheets 6%23% 10%
Goal before half-time 84%73% 87%
Goal after half-time 87%78% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.04
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FredericiaYellow cardJeppe Kudsk
  2. FredericiaGoalSvenn CroneAssist: Jakob Jessen
  3. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Julius NielsenOff: Callum McCowatt
  4. FredericiaSubstitutionOn: Eskild Munk DallOff: Daníel Freyr Kristjánsson
  5. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Marcus HansenOff: Oliver Ross
  6. SilkeborgYellow cardSimon Fynbo Stücker
  7. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Jeppe AndersenOff: Mads Larsen
  8. FredericiaSubstitutionOn: Gustav Ølsted MarcussenOff: Friday Ubi Etim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Frederik SvendsenMatches officiated: 12
3.08Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins8%Draws42%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Fredericia's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Silkeborg. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Fredericia vs Silkeborg?

The Superliga match finished Fredericia 4:1 Silkeborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Fredericia and Silkeborg?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Fredericia won 2, Silkeborg won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Fredericia vs Silkeborg?

Fredericia score 1.32 goals per game on average and Silkeborg 1.29. The Superliga average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Fredericia's matches and 55% of Silkeborg's.

What form are Fredericia and Silkeborg in?

Over the last 5 games Fredericia have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Silkeborg 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fredericia vs Silkeborg?

The statistical background for Fredericia vs Silkeborg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.