Latvia - VirsligaData current as of September 06, 2026

FS Jelgava vs Auda: match statistics

FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava
2 : 3half-time 2:1
Auda crest
Auda

FS Jelgava vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

FS Jelgava played against Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on April 21, 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Recent form

FS Jelgava has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Auda has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

FS Jelgava scores 0.57 goals per game and allows 2.00. Auda scores 1.57 and allows 1.14. Games in this league average 2.75 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of FS Jelgava's games and 71% of Auda's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 57%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Auda has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.24 per game. FS Jelgava takes 9.7 shots per game, while Auda takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

FS Jelgava leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.14 goals per game after halftime. Auda leads at halftime in 57% and scores 0.86 after halftime.

When the teams score

FS Jelgava's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Auda, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.75 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda is the clear favorite in this fixture: they sit 3rd in the table versus FS Jelgava in 8th, and have scored 11 goals this season compared to the hosts’ 4. In attack the visitors show superior metrics — Auda averages 1.5 goals away, produces 13 shots (4.75 on target) and posts a 12% conversion rate, while Jelgava at home averages 0.5 goals, 9 shots (3 on target) and a 6% conversion. The quality of chances also favors Auda: average xG for the visitors on the road is 1.51 versus 1.21 xG for Jelgava at home, while xG against is 1.03 for Auda compared to 1.6 for Jelgava. The form trend is unambiguous — in the last 5 matches Jelgava have scored only 1 goal, failed to win any game (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses) and average 0.2 points per match, whereas Auda have scored 7 goals in their last 5, won 2 games and average 1.4 points per match. Additionally Auda have had no blanks on the road (0% goalless away performances) versus 75% of Jelgava’s home matches without a goal, therefore I forecast a win for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

In the last 5 matches FS Jelgava have averaged only 0.2 goals scored and 2.4 goals conceded, with BTTS in their last 5 at 20%. Visitors Auda have BTTS at 80% in their last 5, averaging 1.4 scored and 1.4 conceded per match, but seasonally Auda record 50% clean sheets and only 0.5 goals conceded per game. Seasonal xG indicates scoring potential: home xG 1.68 versus xG against Auda 1.03, and away xG 1.51 versus xG against the hosts 1.58, while the hosts’ seasonal BTTS rate is 100% against a league average of 60%. Despite these seasonal signals, the key factor is Jelgava’s form drop (0.2 goals in the last 5 vs season 1.67) and the high number of goals conceded by the hosts (2.4 in the last 5 and 2.0 seasonally), which reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. Therefore I assign a higher probability to the 'No' market at 60% versus 40% for 'Yes', because Jelgava’s poor finishing in the last 5 (0.2) and Auda’s solid seasonal defensive numbers (0.5 average conceded and 50% CS) outweigh the hosts’ seasonal BTTS rate.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate expected goals at 1.36 for FS Jelgava and 1.54 for Auda (total 2.90); this valuation factors in both teams' xG: 1.68 (Jelgava) and 1.51 (Auda) as well as xG against: 1.03 (Auda) and 1.58 (Jelgava). A strong confirmation for Over is that the percentage of matches over 1.5 goals is 100% for the home side and 75% for the visitors, and both teams average 13+ shots (13.67 and 13.0) with 5.33 and 4.75 shots on target. Additionally, Jelgava has not kept a clean sheet this season (CS 0%) and has a season BTTS of 100%, while Auda has 50% clean sheets but scored 7 goals in the last 5 rounds (1.4 average) versus 1 goal for Jelgava (0.2 average), which increases the likelihood of goal volatility. The combined xG for both teams is 3.19 (1.68+1.51), and with equal 12% shooting conversion for both sides and the head-to-head and season history (high seasonOver1.5 and shot volumes), the strongest and safest pick is Over 1.5; the 2.5 line has a moderate probability (~60%), and 3.5 is risky (~25%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is the away team leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time (2/2) — I assess its probability at 35%. Auda led at the break in 3 of 4 recorded cases (leadingAtHT_away = 3, leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 75%), scores on average 0.75 goals by Half-Time (scoredAVGHT_away = 0.75) and does not concede goals by Half-Time (concededAVGHT_away = 0.0), whereas Jelgava averages 0.67 scored and 0.67 conceded by Half-Time (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.67, concededAVGHT_home = 0.67). After 90 minutes the favorite is the away side: Auda has seasonPPG_away = 2.5 and a 75% win rate (winPercentage_away = 75%), while Jelgava has seasonPPG_home = 1.0 with a 33% win rate (winPercentage_home = 33%), and hosts concede on average 2.0 goals per match versus 0.5 for the away side (seasonConcededAVG_home = 2.0, seasonConcededAVG_away = 0.5). The home team records 100% of home matches with both teams scoring (seasonBTTSPercentage_home = 100%), so alternative scenarios are Half-Time draw and away win (X/2 — 15%) or away leading at Half-Time and a turnaround to draw/hold (2/X — 10%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

36Possession (%)64
FS JelgavaAuda
5Shots16
FS JelgavaAuda
2Shots on target5
FS JelgavaAuda
0.73xG1.83
FS JelgavaAuda
1Corners5
FS JelgavaAuda
36Dangerous attacks65
FS JelgavaAuda
17Fouls23
FS JelgavaAuda
4Cards2
FS JelgavaAuda

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.57Goals scored / game1.57
FS JelgavaAuda
2Goals allowed / game1.14
FS JelgavaAuda
45%Average possession54%
FS JelgavaAuda
2.86Shots on target / game5
FS JelgavaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.71Shots per game13.29
FS JelgavaAuda
2.86Shots on target5
FS JelgavaAuda
5.9%Shot conversion11.8%
FS JelgavaAuda
45%Possession54%
FS JelgavaAuda
1.24xG for1.58
FS JelgavaAuda
1.7xG against1.27
FS JelgavaAuda

Shooting quality

FS Jelgava: BalancedAuda: Balanced
FS JelgavaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)29%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Auda is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - FS Jelgava · 1.4 pts / game - Auda

FS Jelgava
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
14% W29% R57% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-4
0.71 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-3
Last 5 at home
1-0-3
WLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Auda
LWWLD
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-2
1.86 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 away
3-1-0
WWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 175% better for: goals scored per game.

0.57 goals / game - FS Jelgava · 1.57 goals / game - Auda

Auda is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - FS Jelgava · 1.14 goals / game - Auda

FS Jelgava scoring profile: mixed

FS Jelgava scores in 43% of games (3 of 7 meczów), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 meczów).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 100% of games (7 of 7 meczów), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 meczów).

4Goals scored (season)11
FS JelgavaAuda
14Goals conceded (season)8
FS JelgavaAuda
2.57Average goals per game2.71
FS JelgavaAuda
1Goals scored (last 5)7
FS JelgavaAuda
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
FS JelgavaAuda

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal100%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%2 goals57%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%3 goals0%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%4 goals0%
FS JelgavaAuda

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal71%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%2 goals29%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%3 goals14%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%4 goals0%
FS JelgavaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%Scored in both halves43%
FS JelgavaAuda

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
FS JelgavaAuda
20%BTTS - last 580%
FS JelgavaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
FS JelgavaAuda
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
FS JelgavaAuda
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
FS JelgavaAuda

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
FS JelgavaAuda
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
FS JelgavaAuda

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / game - FS Jelgava · 2 pts / game - Auda

FS Jelgava - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing
Auda - half-time state
57% leading29% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per game (1st half)2
FS JelgavaAuda
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.71
FS JelgavaAuda
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
FS JelgavaAuda
1.14Average goals (1st half)1
FS JelgavaAuda
43%Clean sheet before half-time71%
FS JelgavaAuda
57%No goal before half-time29%
FS JelgavaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per game (2nd half)1.14
FS JelgavaAuda
0.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
FS JelgavaAuda
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
FS JelgavaAuda
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.71
FS JelgavaAuda
43%Clean sheet after half-time29%
FS JelgavaAuda
86%No goal after half-time29%
FS JelgavaAuda

FS Jelgava - second-half results

14% W29% R57% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Auda - second-half results

14% W71% R14% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FS Jelgava - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.40
Goals scored / game0.20.0
Goals allowed / game0.81.6
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Auda - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Auda
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

FS JelgavaLigaAuda
Average goals per game 2.572.75 2.71
Both teams scored 43%61% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%47% 57%
Clean sheets 0%19% 29%
Goal before half-time 86%78% 86%
Goal after half-time 71%83% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / game
1.56
Away goals / game
+-24%
Home attack advantage
+-31%
Home defensive advantage
+-19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FS JelgavaGoalAlans KangarsAssist: Leo's Prior
  2. AudaYellow cardOskars Rubenis
  3. FS JelgavaGoalRoberts MeļķisAssist: Glebs Žaleiko
  4. FS JelgavaYellow cardGļebs Kačanovs
  5. AudaGoalJosé MendietaAssist: Tin Hrvoj
  6. FS JelgavaYellow cardArtūrs Janovskis
  7. AudaYellow cardWally Fofana
  8. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Gļebs PatikaOff: Roberts Meļķis
  9. FS JelgavaYellow cardAlans Kangars
  10. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Aleksandrs ButovskisOff: Glebs Žaleiko
  11. AudaSubstitutionOn: Ousmane CamaraOff: José Mendieta
  12. FS JelgavaYellow cardAleksandrs Butovskis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from FS Jelgava's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses against Auda. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FS Jelgava
1 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
3 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava

FAQ

What was the result of FS Jelgava vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 2:3 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Auda?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 1, Auda won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Auda?

FS Jelgava score 0.57 goals per game on average and Auda 1.57. The Virsliga average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 43% of FS Jelgava's matches and 71% of Auda's.

What form are FS Jelgava and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Auda 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Auda?

The statistical background for FS Jelgava vs Auda — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.