FS Jelgava vs Rīgas FS: match statistics
FS Jelgava vs Rīgas FS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
FS Jelgava played against Rīgas FS in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on July 20, 2026. Venue: Zemgales Olimpiskā centra. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
FS Jelgava has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Rīgas FS has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
FS Jelgava scores 1.09 goals per game and allows 1.73. Rīgas FS scores 2.45 and allows 0.73. Games in this league average 3.01 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of FS Jelgava's games and 45% of Rīgas FS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 59%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rīgas FS has the higher season xG average, 1.95 to 1.30 per game. FS Jelgava takes 10.6 shots per game, while Rīgas FS takes 15.9.
First-half and second-half trends
FS Jelgava leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 55% and scores 1.36 after halftime.
When the teams score
FS Jelgava's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Rīgas FS, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 3.01 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rīgas FS is the favorite in this clash: they have 18 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses this season, sitting 2nd, while FS Jelgava has only 6 wins, 7 draws and 9 losses and is 6th. The visitors have scored 54 goals this season (1.91 away on average), and the hosts 24 (1.18 per home match), although in the last 5 games Jelgava scored 11 goals versus Rīgas' 10. Rīgas’ defense is significantly more stable: they concede 0.73 goals on average away, have xG against 0.83 and 55% clean sheets, while Jelgava concedes 1.73 at home, has xG against 1.56 and only 18% clean sheets. Rīgas also creates more quality chances (16.27 average shots and 6.36 on target away vs 11.55 shots and 3.82 on target for Jelgava at home) and controls the ball (62% possession vs 46%). Considering the advantage in goal difference (+13 for Rīgas away vs -6 for the hosts), higher xG (2.02 vs 1.39) and better form (Rīgas 4 wins and 1 draw in 5, Jelgava 3 wins and 2 losses), I assess a 70% chance for an away win, 15% for a draw and 15% for a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back 'no' (BTTS - No) at 60% vs 40% because Rīgas FS's defensive edge outweighs the hosts' offensive activity. The visitors have 55% clean sheets this season and conceded only 16 goals versus 38 conceded by FS Jelgava; over the last 5 matches Rīgas FS conceded on average 0.6 goals while Jelgava conceded 1.4. Although seasonally Jelgava scores an average of 3.0 goals and has a higher conversion rate (19% vs 12%), the BTTS rate in the last 5 matches is 40% for Jelgava and 60% for Rīgas FS, producing mixed signals. Additionally xG shows 2.02 for Rīgas FS versus 1.88 for Jelgava, and the visitors register more shots on target (6.36 vs 5.82), which suggests Rīgas FS more often decides matches without conceding. Overall the stronger, more consistent signal from the data indicates a 'no' scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5: 91% of Jelgava’s home matches and 64% of Rīgas FS matches have seen more than 1.5 goals, averaging around 78%. xG are 1.88 for Jelgava and 2.02 for Rīgas FS (3.90 xG combined), and average shots are 15.6 (Jelgava) and 16.3 (Rīgas), indicating plenty of goal-scoring opportunities. Jelgava has a high shot conversion rate of 19% versus Rīgas’s 12%, which explains their 3.0 home goals per game despite 1.88 xG and increases the probability of at least two goals in the match. I assess Over 2.5 as moderately likely (60%): season Over2.5 is 64% for Jelgava and 55% for Rīgas, while Over 3.5 is less certain (~41%) due to only 18% of Rīgas matches exceeding 3.5. Therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest and most justified signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1: FS Jelgava led at the break in 55% of matches and score an average of 1.18 goals in the first half, while Rīgas FS concedes on average 0.55 goals before the break. The hosts score 3.0 goals per match versus 1.91 for their opponents and have a higher shot conversion rate (19% vs 12%), which increases their ability to maintain a lead at the break. After the interval Jelgava is particularly dangerous — averaging 1.82 goals in the second half and with 91% of matches featuring at least one goal after the break, indicating the hosts often extend their advantage. Rīgas FS have a higher xG (2.02 vs 1.88) and a better win rate this season (91% vs 73%), so guest victories are plausible, but the first- and second-half statistics favor the hosts. Consequently I assign the highest probability to 1/1, with moderate probability for outcomes such as X/1 and 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| FS Jelgava | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rīgas FS is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - FS Jelgava · 2 pts / game - Rīgas FS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS is 125% better for: goals scored per game.
1.09 goals / game - FS Jelgava · 2.45 goals / game - Rīgas FS
Rīgas FS is 137% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.73 goals / game - FS Jelgava · 0.73 goals / game - Rīgas FS
FS Jelgava scores in 59% of games (13 of 22 meczów), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 50% (11 of 22 meczów).
Rīgas FS scores in 95% of games (21 of 22 meczów), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - FS Jelgava
Over / Under - Rīgas FS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - FS Jelgava · 1.95 pts / game - Rīgas FS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
FS Jelgava - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Rīgas FS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 55% of games and wins 82%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
FS Jelgava
Rīgas FS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| FS Jelgava | Liga | Rīgas FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.82 | 3.01 | ▲ 3.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 57% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 23% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | • 77% | 76% | • 77% |
| Goal after half-time | • 86% | 85% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from FS Jelgava's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 4 losses against Rīgas FS. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of FS Jelgava vs Rīgas FS?
The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 0:1 Rīgas FS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Rīgas FS?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 1, Rīgas FS won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Rīgas FS?
FS Jelgava score 1.09 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS 2.45. The Virsliga average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 45% of FS Jelgava's matches and 45% of Rīgas FS's.
What form are FS Jelgava and Rīgas FS in?
Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Rīgas FS 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Rīgas FS?
The statistical background for FS Jelgava vs Rīgas FS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


