Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 17 July 2026

FS Jelgava vs Super Nova: match statistics

FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

FS Jelgava vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

FS Jelgava play Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 6 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

FS Jelgava: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Super Nova: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

FS Jelgava scores 1.09 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.05 and concedes 1.59. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: FS Jelgava 45%, Super Nova 64%. Over 2.5: FS Jelgava 41%, Super Nova 59%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

FS Jelgava has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.15. FS Jelgava: 10.6 shots per match, Super Nova: 8.6.

Match halves

FS Jelgava: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.45. Super Nova: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

FS Jelgava: 16-30 (5 goals). Super Nova: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 3-3-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 67%.

Match description

Super Nova is the clear statistical favorite: they sit 5th and have 67% wins away with an average of 1.17 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per match, while FS Jelgava are 9th with only 20% home wins. Visitors average 3.33 shots on target and have a 14% conversion rate; hosts average 2.8 SoT with a 10% conversion. Additionally, Jelgava fail to score in 60% of home games versus 17% of Super Nova’s away matches. xG is nearly identical (1.12 vs 1.13), but Jelgava’s defense looks worse — average xG against 1.65 and actually 2.8 goals conceded at home versus 1.44 xG against and 1.0 goals conceded for the visitors. Both teams have conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches, but Super Nova have 33% clean sheets away vs 0% for Jelgava at home and superior finishing, which gives them the edge. Considering these figures, I predict an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
13Shots7
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
4Shots on target2
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.55xG0.9
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
7Corners4
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
63Dangerous attacks44
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
15Fouls17
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
3Cards1
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.09Goals scored / match1.05
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.73Goals conceded / match1.59
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
44%Average possession45%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
3.5Shots on target / match3.45
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.59Shots per match8.64
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
3.5Shots on target3.45
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
10.3%Shot conversion12.1%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
44%Possession45%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.3xG for1.15
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.72xG against1.68
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Shooting quality

FS Jelgava: BalancedSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FS Jelgava is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 0.8 pts / match - Super Nova

FS Jelgava
LWWWL
Season result split
27% W32% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-9
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Super Nova
DLLWL
Season result split
32% W14% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-12
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Super Nova is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.73 goals / match - FS Jelgava · 1.59 goals / match - Super Nova

FS Jelgava scoring profile: strong

FS Jelgava scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

24Goals scored (season)23
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
38Goals conceded (season)35
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
2.82Average goals in match2.64
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
11Goals scored (last 5)4
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal77%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
27%2 goals23%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
9%3 goals5%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
9%4 goals0%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal82%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
32%2 goals50%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
23%3 goals14%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
14%4 goals9%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time32%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
0%BTTS in both halves0%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
18%Scored in both halves9%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
40%BTTS - last 560%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FS Jelgava is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - FS Jelgava · 1.05 pts / match - Super Nova

FS Jelgava - half-time state
41% leading27% draw32% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.05
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.59
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.45
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
55%Clean sheet before half-time50%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
55%No goal before half-time55%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.14
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.14Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.18
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
36%Clean sheet after half-time45%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova
68%No goal after half-time59%
FS JelgavaSuper Nova

FS Jelgava - second-half results

27% W18% R55% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova - second-half results

32% W18% R50% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.80
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
6
16-30
5
2
31-45
1
6
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
3
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

FS JelgavaLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match 2.822.99 2.64
Both teams scored 45%57% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%55% 59%
Clean sheets 18%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 77%75% 64%
Goal after half-time 86%85% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): FS Jelgava 3 - 3 - 0 Super Nova. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.

SK Super Nova
1 : 5
FS Jelgava
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
1 : 0
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
0 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
2 : 1
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of FS Jelgava vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished FS Jelgava 1:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between FS Jelgava and Super Nova?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches FS Jelgava won 3, Super Nova won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before FS Jelgava vs Super Nova?

FS Jelgava score 1.09 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.05. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 45% of FS Jelgava's matches and 64% of Super Nova's.

What form are FS Jelgava and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games FS Jelgava have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Super Nova 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for FS Jelgava vs Super Nova?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.