Fuerte San Francisco vs FAS: match statistics
Fuerte San Francisco vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Fuerte San Francisco played against FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Estadio Correcaminos. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Fuerte San Francisco has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. FAS has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Fuerte San Francisco scores 0.71 goals per game and allows 1.71. FAS scores 1.86 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Fuerte San Francisco's games and 57% of FAS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 57%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.84 to 1.40 per game. Fuerte San Francisco takes 9.3 shots per game, while FAS takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Fuerte San Francisco leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. FAS leads at halftime in 29% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Fuerte San Francisco's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For FAS, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 4.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fuerte San Francisco remain unbeaten at home: they have won 1 of 3 matches and drawn the other 2, averaging 1.33 goals scored and 1.00 conceded. FAS have the better overall season record, with 4 wins and a 13:7 goal difference compared with the hosts’ 5:12, while also creating more quality chances away from home (xG 1.87 versus 1.63). The visitors see more of the ball, 55% to 39%, and register 11.33 shots on target per match, but they have lost 2 of their 3 away games and have yet to draw on the road. Fuerte’s defense allows opponents an xG of 2.02 at home, giving FAS a realistic chance to score, but the hosts have not yet been held scoreless on their own turf. The combination of Fuerte’s solid home form and FAS’s inconsistent away results points towards a draw, likely with both teams scoring.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Fuerte San Francisco have recorded BTTS in 75% of their home matches, while FAS have done so in 33% of their away fixtures, making the season data clearly mixed. Recent form slightly strengthens the scenario of goals for both sides: BTTS occurred in 40% of the hosts’ last five matches and in 60% of FAS’s games. Fuerte have scored only 0.8 goals per match recently, while FAS have conceded an average of 1.2 goals, and the hosts have allowed opponents 1.4 goals. The chance-quality indicators are favorable for goals, with xG standing at 1.52 for Fuerte and 1.72 for FAS, alongside as much as 2.02 xG conceded by the hosts recently. The BTTS - Yes pick is marginally stronger than the league average of 49%, but the edge remains limited due to Fuerte’s poor finishing in their last five outings.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The signal for at least two goals is strong, as the 1.5-goal line has been surpassed in 75% of Fuerte San Francisco’s matches and in every FAS fixture. FAS averages 1.87 xG, while the home side’s defense allows 1.47 xG across the season and as much as 2.02 over its last five matches. The hosts have shown lower current scoring efficiency, averaging 0.8 goals in their last five appearances, but FAS has conceded 1.2 goals per game during this period, giving the hosts a chance to score as well. The 2.5-goal line is more evenly balanced: it has been covered in 50% of the home side’s matches and 67% of the visitors’ fixtures, but in only 40% of the last five matches for both teams. Therefore, the safest edge remains Over 1.5 goals, supported by a projection of 2.65 total goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Fuerte San Francisco have a clearly stronger home record: they score an average of 2.00 goals, concede just 0.75, and have won 75% of their matches, while FAS have lost 67% of their away games. The hosts have taken the lead at the break less frequently (25% compared with FAS’s 33%), but their stronger post-half-time record is also significant: they score an average of 1.00 goal after the break and concede only 0.25. FAS create considerable danger, averaging 11.33 shots on target and posting an xG of 1.87, which is why draw-at-half-time scenarios remain highly rated. Recent form nevertheless calls for caution, as the hosts have scored only 0.8 goals per match across their last five games, although FAS have also conceded an average of 1.2 goals. The strongest individual scenario remains Fuerte San Francisco leading at half-time and maintaining their victory through to full-time, thanks to their home advantage and more solid defense.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Fuerte San Francisco | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 51% | 67% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.15 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FAS is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Fuerte San Francisco · 2 pts / game - FAS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 162% better for: goals scored per game.
0.71 goals / game - Fuerte San Francisco · 1.86 goals / game - FAS
FAS is 71% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.71 goals / game - Fuerte San Francisco · 1 goals / game - FAS
Fuerte San Francisco scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 games), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
FAS scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while Fuerte San Francisco keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Fuerte San Francisco
Over / Under - FAS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fuerte San Francisco is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / game - Fuerte San Francisco · 1.29 pts / game - FAS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Fuerte San Francisco - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
FAS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Fuerte San Francisco
FAS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Fuerte San Francisco | Liga | FAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.43 | 2.59 | ▲ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 49% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 43% | 44% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 33% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 59% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | • 71% | 71% | • 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- FASGoalRafael Tejada
Head-to-head
Record from Fuerte San Francisco's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses against FAS. Games average 4.25 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Fuerte San Francisco vs FAS?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Fuerte San Francisco 0:1 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Fuerte San Francisco and FAS?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Fuerte San Francisco won 0, FAS won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Fuerte San Francisco vs FAS?
Fuerte San Francisco score 0.71 goals per game on average and FAS 1.86. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Fuerte San Francisco's matches and 57% of FAS's.
What form are Fuerte San Francisco and FAS in?
Over the last 5 games Fuerte San Francisco have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and FAS 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Fuerte San Francisco vs FAS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.