Gamba All Blacks vs Medeama: match statistics
Medeama are the clear favourites in this match, sitting 1st in the league table compared to Gamba All Blacks' 14th place. The visitors boast a significantly better season record (12 wins, 9 draws, 2 losses) and a higher goal-scoring efficiency (32 goals scored vs 15 conceded). Gamba All Blacks are in a poor run of form, losing 4 of their last 5 matches and scoring only 2 goals in that period. Although the hosts have a decent home record (42% wins), Medeama show defensive solidity in away matches (45% clean sheets) and an advantage in key stats, such as a higher shot conversion rate (11% vs 8%). Medeama's positive goal difference on the road (+3) and the hosts' current poor form (0.6 points per match in the last 5 games) point towards an away win, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to Medeama's tendency to share points (45% draws in away matches).
Gamba All Blacks vs Medeama: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gamba All Blacks played against Medeama in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The game was played on March 1, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Gamba All Blacks has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Medeama has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Gamba All Blacks scores 0.87 goals per game and allows 0.91. Medeama scores 1.39 and allows 0.65. Games in this league average 1.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of Gamba All Blacks's games and 52% of Medeama's. The Over 2.5 rates are 22% and 43%, compared with league averages of 33% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Medeama has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.31 per game. Gamba All Blacks takes 9.7 shots per game, while Medeama takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Gamba All Blacks leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.39 goals per game after halftime. Medeama leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.70 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gamba All Blacks's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Medeama, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ghana Premier League games average 1.89 goals. Both teams score in 33% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Medeama are the clear favorites in this match, sitting 1st in the league table compared to Gamba All Blacks' 14th place. The visitors boast a significantly better season record (12 wins, 9 draws, 2 losses) and a higher goal-scoring efficiency (32 goals scored vs 15 conceded). Gamba All Blacks are in a poor run of form, losing 4 of their last 5 matches and scoring only 2 goals in that period. Although the hosts have a decent home record (42% wins), Medeama show defensive solidity in away matches (45% clean sheets) and an advantage in key stats, such as a higher shot conversion rate (11% vs 8%). Medeama's positive goal difference on the road (+3) and the hosts' current poor form (0.6 points per match in the last 5 games) point towards an away win, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to Medeama's tendency to share points (45% draws in away matches).
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gamba All Blacks | Medeama | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Medeama is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Gamba All Blacks · 1.6 pts / game - Medeama
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Medeama is 60% better for: goals scored per game.
0.87 goals / game - Gamba All Blacks · 1.39 goals / game - Medeama
Medeama is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.91 goals / game - Gamba All Blacks · 0.65 goals / game - Medeama
Gamba All Blacks scores in 52% of games (12 of 23 meczów), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 meczów).
Medeama scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while Gamba All Blacks keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gamba All Blacks
Over / Under - Medeama
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Medeama is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / game - Gamba All Blacks · 1.57 pts / game - Medeama
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gamba All Blacks - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Medeama - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gamba All Blacks
Medeama
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Gamba All Blacks | Liga | Medeama | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.78 | 1.89 | ▲ 2.04 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 33% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 22% | 30% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 35% | 42% | • 43% |
| Goal before half-time | • 61% | 61% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 65% | 61% | ▲ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Gamba All Blacks's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Medeama. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gamba All Blacks vs Medeama?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Gamba All Blacks 0:0 Medeama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gamba All Blacks vs Medeama?
Gamba All Blacks score 0.87 goals per game on average and Medeama 1.39. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Gamba All Blacks's matches and 52% of Medeama's.
What form are Gamba All Blacks and Medeama in?
Over the last 5 games Gamba All Blacks have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Medeama 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gamba All Blacks vs Medeama?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gamba All Blacks vs Medeama: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.