Gangwon vs Gwangju: match statistics
Gangwon vs Gwangju: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gangwon played against Gwangju in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on August 26, 2026. Venue: Chuncheon Songam Stadium. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Gangwon has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Gwangju has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Gangwon scores 1.22 goals per game and allows 0.96. Gwangju scores 0.50 and allows 2.08. Games in this league average 2.39 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Gangwon's games and 38% of Gwangju's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 46%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gangwon has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.12 per game. Gangwon takes 13.4 shots per game, while Gwangju takes 9.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Gangwon leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Gwangju leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gangwon's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Gwangju, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.39 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gangwon are the league’s third-placed team, while Gwangju sit 12th, with the difference particularly pronounced in matches under these conditions. At home, the hosts average 1.4 goals, create chances worth 1.86 xG and register 4.7 shots on target per match, whereas the visitors score just 0.27 goals away from home, with a 3% conversion rate. Gwangju have not won a single away fixture, have lost 64% of such matches and failed to score in 73% of them, severely limiting their chances against a Gangwon defense that concedes only 0.9 goals per home game. The hosts’ advantage is further reinforced by the opponents’ defensive weakness: Gwangju concede an average of 2.36 goals away from home, with opponents allowed 1.65 xG. Although Gangwon have won only 1 of their last 5 matches overall, the superior chance quality, greater possession control (56% versus 49%) and the visitors’ very poor away attack all point towards a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal points to Gwangju’s goalscoring problems: the visitors score an average of just 0.27 goals per match and failed to find the net in 73% of their league fixtures. BTTS - Yes landed in only 27% of Gwangju’s matches this season and just 20% of their last five games, compared with the league average of 53%. Gangwon have also failed to impress in front of goal, averaging 0.75 goals, while the two teams scored 4 and 3 goals respectively across their last five matches. Although the hosts concede an average of 1.92 goals, Gwangju’s current defensive form has limited opponents to just 0.8 goals per match over their last five outings, further supporting a scenario in which at least one side fails to score. Higher recent xG figures—1.86 for Gangwon and 1.51 for Gwangju—reduce confidence in the pick, but the teams’ finishing records to date clearly support BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals, as Gangwon’s matches finished below this line in 75% of cases, while the figure for Gwangju was 64%. Gwangju score just 0.27 goals per game on average and have not scored more than once in any match this season, clearly limiting the potential for a high-scoring game. Gangwon are also not particularly effective, averaging 0.75 goals, although the visitors’ poor defense, conceding 2.36 goals per game, could allow the hosts to score around 1.35 goals. In their last five matches, the two teams scored only 1.4 goals per game combined, despite their average xG figures of 1.86 and 1.51 respectively, indicating a significant problem with finishing. The projected total of 2.15 goals makes a scoreline between 0:0 and 2:1 more likely than an open game with at least four goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time followed by a Gwangju win is the most likely outcome, as Gangwon were level after 45 minutes in 67% of their matches, compared with 45% for Gwangju. Both teams make very slow starts: the hosts average just 0.25 goals before the break, while the visitors average only 0.09, with Gwangju failing to score in the first half in 91% of matches. After the break, Gangwon’s defensive weakness becomes apparent, as they concede an average of 1.08 goals, compared with 1.55 for their opponents; at the same time, at least one goal is scored in the second half in 75% of the hosts’ matches and 73% of the visitors’ matches. Gwangju are in better recent form, winning 40% of their last five matches compared with Gangwon’s 20%, and conceding only 0.8 goals per game during this period, against 1.6 for the hosts. The X/2 scenario is also supported by Gwangju’s advantage in the last five matches at half-time: they averaged 1.6 points compared with Gangwon’s 1.0, although the hosts remain slight favorites in the half-time draw market.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gangwon | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.18 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Gangwon is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Gangwon · 0.2 pts / game - Gwangju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gangwon is 144% better for: goals scored per game.
1.22 goals / game - Gangwon · 0.5 goals / game - Gwangju
Gangwon is 117% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.96 goals / game - Gangwon · 2.08 goals / game - Gwangju
Gangwon scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 meczów), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 meczów).
Gwangju scores in 38% of games (9 of 24 meczów), while Gangwon keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gangwon
Over / Under - Gwangju
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gangwon is 147% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / game - Gangwon · 0.58 pts / game - Gwangju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gangwon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Gwangju - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gangwon
Gwangju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Gangwon | Liga | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.17 | 2.39 | ▲ 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 50% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 42% | ▲ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 62% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 75% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Gangwon's perspective: 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Gwangju. Games average 1.20 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gangwon vs Gwangju?
The K League 1 match finished Gangwon 2:2 Gwangju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gangwon and Gwangju?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Gangwon won 4, Gwangju won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gangwon vs Gwangju?
Gangwon score 1.22 goals per game on average and Gwangju 0.50. The K League 1 average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Gangwon's matches and 38% of Gwangju's.
What form are Gangwon and Gwangju in?
Over the last 5 games Gangwon have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Gwangju 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gangwon vs Gwangju?
The statistical background for Gangwon vs Gwangju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


