Türkiye - Süper LigGaziantep StadyumuData current as of October 15, 2026

Gaziantep FK vs Çorum Belediyespor: match statistics

Gaziantep FK vs Çorum Belediyespor: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Gaziantep FK played against Çorum Belediyespor in Süper Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: Gaziantep Stadyumu. Final score: 0:3.

Recent form

Gaziantep FK has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Çorum Belediyespor has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Gaziantep FK scores 1.17 goals per game and allows 1.17. Çorum Belediyespor scores 2.17 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.92 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Gaziantep FK's games and 67% of Çorum Belediyespor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 83%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Çorum Belediyespor has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.24 per game. Gaziantep FK takes 13.0 shots per game, while Çorum Belediyespor takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Gaziantep FK leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Çorum Belediyespor leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

Gaziantep FK's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Çorum Belediyespor, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Süper Lig games average 2.92 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gaziantep FK hold a slight edge thanks to a more solid defense: they concede an average of 1 goal per match at home, while Çorum Belediyespor concede as many as 3 away. The visitors do average 3 goals on the road, compared with just 0.67 for the hosts at home, but the quality of chances created is similar, with xG figures of 1.19 and 1.24, respectively. The significant gap between the visitors’ goal tally and their xG, coupled with a 29% shot conversion rate, calls for caution when assessing whether this finishing form is sustainable. Both teams have won 2 of their last five matches, but Gaziantep have conceded 6 goals compared with Çorum’s 10, further tipping the balance in the hosts’ favor. The forecast nevertheless remains cautious, as Gaziantep are yet to win at home this season, drawing 2 of their 3 matches.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The visitors have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, scoring an average of 3.0 goals and conceding 3.0, which strongly points to both teams scoring. Gaziantep average 1.78 xG, while their opponents allow chances worth 2.55 xG, making a home goal seem likely. The visitors’ chances of scoring are supported by their average of 2.2 goals over their last five matches, although Gaziantep’s defense restricts opponents to 0.85 xG per match. Caution is warranted, as the hosts have recorded BTTS in only 33% of matches and failed to score in 33%; nevertheless, the visitors’ attacking output and defensive vulnerability tip the assessment towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Gaziantep averages 1.78 xG, while their opponents concede 2.55 xG, giving the hosts a clear basis for finding the net. The visitors have averaged 3.0 goals, despite an xG of 1.19, so I do not expect them to sustain such a high conversion rate. In their last five matches, Çorum scored 2.2 goals and conceded 2.0, with at least three goals scored in 80% of those games, compared with 40% for Gaziantep. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick: the line has been cleared in 67% of the hosts’ matches and 100% of the visitors’ matches, while the gap at Over 3.5 goals is much wider—0% and 100%, respectively.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Gaziantep have been level at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches and did not concede in the first half in 4 of those 5, pointing to a closely contested start. Over the full match, the hosts’ greater potential is reflected in the xG figures: they create chances worth an average of 1.78 goals, compared with 1.19 for the visitors, who allow opponents chances worth as much as 2.55 xG. Çorum concede an average of 2.0 goals after the break, so even if the teams are level at half-time, Gaziantep have a chance to turn the result in their favor. The main risk is the visitors’ finishing, as they score an average of 3.0 goals per match, but their advantage in this metric is much greater than in xG. Therefore, I consider a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time the most likely HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
12Shots13
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
2Shots on target7
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
1.33xG1.57
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
9Corners5
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
59Dangerous attacks35
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
6Fouls10
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
2Cards3
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
1.17Goals scored / game2.17
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
1.17Goals allowed / game2
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
49%Average possession54%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
3.33Shots on target / game5
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game13
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
3.33Shots on target5
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
9%Shot conversion16.7%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
49%Possession54%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
1.24xG for1.49
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
1.44xG against1.7
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

Shooting quality

Gaziantep FK: BalancedÇorum Belediyespor: Efficient finishing
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
Accuracy (shots on target)26%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Gaziantep FK is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Gaziantep FK · 1.2 pts / game - Çorum Belediyespor

Gaziantep FK
WLWDL
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 at home
0-2-1
DLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Çorum Belediyespor
LLWWL
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Çorum Belediyespor is 85% better for: goals scored per game.

1.17 goals / game - Gaziantep FK · 2.17 goals / game - Çorum Belediyespor

Gaziantep FK is 71% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.17 goals / game - Gaziantep FK · 2 goals / game - Çorum Belediyespor

Gaziantep FK scoring profile: very strong

Gaziantep FK scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while Çorum Belediyespor keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).

Çorum Belediyespor scoring profile: very strong

Çorum Belediyespor scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Gaziantep FK keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).

7Goals scored (season)13
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
7Goals conceded (season)12
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
2.33Average goals per game4.17
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
6Goals scored (last 5)11
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal83%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
17%2 goals67%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
17%3 goals33%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
17%4 goals17%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal83%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
50%2 goals50%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0%3 goals17%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0%4 goals17%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0%Scored in both halves33%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
40%BTTS - last 560%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Çorum Belediyespor is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Gaziantep FK · 1.33 pts / game - Çorum Belediyespor

Gaziantep FK - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Çorum Belediyespor - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.33
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.83
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.5
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
67%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
83%No goal before half-time67%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per game (2nd half)1.33
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.33
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
1.17Average goals (2nd half)2.67
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
67%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor
50%No goal after half-time17%
Gaziantep FKÇorum Belediyespor

Gaziantep FK - second-half results

50% W17% D33% L
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Çorum Belediyespor - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Gaziantep FK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Çorum Belediyespor - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game1.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.82.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Gaziantep FK
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Çorum Belediyespor
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Gaziantep FK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Çorum Belediyespor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
178%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 31% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Süper Lig).

Teams vs league

Gaziantep FKLigaÇorum Belediyespor
Average goals per game▼ 2.332.92▲ 4.17
Both teams scored▲ 50%45%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%57%▲ 83%
Clean sheets▲ 33%31%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%75%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time• 83%82%• 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / game
1.22
Away goals / game
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Çorum BelediyesporGoalCengiz ÜnderAssist: Mohammed Diomande
  2. Çorum BelediyesporYellow cardMohammed Diomande
  3. Çorum BelediyesporSubstitutionOn: Ylber RamadaniOff: Berat Ayberk Özdemir
  4. Gaziantep FKSubstitutionOn: Ulrich MelekeOff: Ogün Özçiçek
  5. Gaziantep FKSubstitutionOn: Drissa Gui CamaraOff: Halil İbrahim Dervişoğlu
  6. Çorum BelediyesporGoalAlexandros KyziridisAssist: Gökhan Sazdağı
  7. Çorum BelediyesporSubstitutionOn: Markus Seehusen KarlsbakkOff: Gökhan Sazdağı
  8. Gaziantep FKSubstitutionOn: Serdar DursunOff: Victor Ntino-Emo Gidado
  9. Çorum BelediyesporYellow cardAlexandros Kyziridis
  10. Çorum BelediyesporGoalMarkus Seehusen KarlsbakkAssist: Alexandros Kyziridis
  11. Gaziantep FKSubstitutionOn: Sabahattin DesticiOff: Luis Jesús Pérez Maqueda
  12. Gaziantep FKSubstitutionOn: Sontje HansenOff: Alexandru Iulian Maxim
  13. Çorum BelediyesporYellow cardYoussoufa Moukoko
  14. Gaziantep FKYellow cardLeo Myenty Janna Abena
  15. Gaziantep FKYellow cardSontje Hansen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Gaziantep FK vs Çorum Belediyespor?

The Süper Lig match finished Gaziantep FK 0:3 Çorum Belediyespor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Gaziantep FK vs Çorum Belediyespor?

Gaziantep FK score 1.17 goals per game on average and Çorum Belediyespor 2.17. The Süper Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Gaziantep FK's matches and 67% of Çorum Belediyespor's.

What form are Gaziantep FK and Çorum Belediyespor in?

Over the last 5 games Gaziantep FK have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Çorum Belediyespor 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gaziantep FK vs Çorum Belediyespor?

The statistical background for Gaziantep FK vs Çorum Belediyespor — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.