Singapore - S.LeagueData current as of September 07, 2026

Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar: match statistics

Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Geylang International played against Tanjong Pagar in S.League (Singapore). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Geylang International has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Tanjong Pagar has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Geylang International scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.67. Tanjong Pagar scores 0.81 and allows 3.00. Games in this league average 3.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 47% of Geylang International's games and 50% of Tanjong Pagar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 81%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Geylang International has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.18 per game. Geylang International takes 11.9 shots per game, while Tanjong Pagar takes 9.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Geylang International leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Tanjong Pagar leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.56 after halftime.

When the teams score

Geylang International's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Tanjong Pagar, it is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

S.League games average 3.59 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The home side, Geylang International, are clear favorites — they sit 5th with 6 wins this season, while Tanjong Pagar are 8th with just 1 victory. Over the last 5 matches Geylang have scored 5 goals and recorded a form line of 2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses, averaging 1.4 points per game; Tanjong Pagar have managed only 1 goal, lost all 5 and have 0 points in that period. The decisive advantage for the hosts is defensive: Geylang concede 1.71 goals per home match on average (25 conceded this season) and have 14% clean sheets at home, whereas Tanjong Pagar concede 2.86 goals away (48 conceded this season) and have 0% clean sheets. In attack xG is similar — 1.21 home xG for Geylang versus 1.19 away xG for Tanjong, and both average 0.86 goals scored — however xG against of 1.37 versus 2.5 indicates a substantially higher defensive vulnerability for the visitors. On that basis I tip a home win; estimated probabilities: Geylang win 70%, draw 18%, Tanjong Pagar win 12%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis supports BTTS - Yes: Geylang concedes an average of 3.11 goals per match, Tanjong Pagar concedes 2.86 goals per match, and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, which strongly increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Season BTTS rates are 33% for Geylang and 71% for Tanjong, with the league BTTS average at 52%, suggesting a tilt toward a both-teams-to-score scenario. The league environment is high-scoring — league average goals is 3.58, and the over 2.5 rate is 78% for Geylang and 86% for Tanjong; additionally, 33% of Geylang’s matches and 56% of Tanjong’s matches combine over 2.5 with BTTS. A counterpoint is Tanjong’s poor attacking form: only 1 goal in the last 5 matches (0.2 per match) and 20% BTTS in the last five, which lowers confidence that they will score. Even so, Geylang’s last 5 show average xG 1.3 and goals scored 1.0 per match, while Tanjong has conceded an average 2.44 xG and 2.8 goals in that period, so I expect both sides to find the net — therefore I assign higher weight to BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Averaging the teams' offensive xG and the opponent's xG conceded yields a high goals projection: Geylang has xG 1.16 and Tanjong concedes 2.50 xG — the average of these values is 1.83 expected goals for the home side. Similarly, Tanjong has xG 1.19 while Geylang concedes 2.42 xG — the average is 1.81 for the away side, totaling 3.64 goals. Seasonal metrics reinforce pressure toward the over: Over 1.5 occurred in 89% of Geylang’s matches and 100% of Tanjong’s, while Over 2.5 appeared in 78% and 86% of their games respectively. Additionally, both teams concede many goals (Geylang 25 conceded, Tanjong 48), the league average is 3.58 goals per match, and average shots are around 9.8 and 10 with shot-on-target figures of 3.22 and 3.14, indicating numerous chances. As a result, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 — the historical 89%/100% and the projected 3.64 goals provide a high safety margin, although Over 2.5 is also materially likely (approximately 78–86% historically).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Both teams have serious defensive issues: Geylang concedes an average of 3.11 goals per match, Tanjong Pagar 2.86, and the xG against is 2.42 versus 2.50, indicating high susceptibility to conceding. At half-time the teams typically score very little — average goals scored by half are 0.22 for the home side and 0.29 for the visitors, although in the last five matches Geylang averages 0.8 goals by the break compared to Tanjong’s 0.2. Most goals arrive after the break: average second-half goals are 2.11 in Geylang’s matches and 2.00 in Tanjong’s, and the percentage of matches with at least one goal after half-time is 78% and 86% respectively. Form favors the hosts — Geylang’s last five are l d l w w and they average 1.4 points per match in that period, while Tanjong’s last five are l l l l l with 0.0 points per match, so the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a Geylang win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

62Possession (%)38
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
17Shots12
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
9Shots on target4
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
2.23xG1.39
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
0Corners4
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
74Dangerous attacks48
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
6Fouls12
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
1Cards3
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
1.13Goals scored / game0.81
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
1.67Goals allowed / game3
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
44%Average possession42%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
3.2Shots on target / game3.19
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.93Shots per game9.88
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
3.2Shots on target3.19
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
9.5%Shot conversion8.2%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
44%Possession42%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
1.37xG for1.18
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
1.44xG against2.45
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

Shooting quality

Geylang International: BalancedTanjong Pagar: Balanced
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
Accuracy (shots on target)27%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Geylang International
LDLWW
Season result split
40% W13% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-7
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tanjong Pagar
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
6% W6% R88% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-14
0.25 pts / game · goal difference -35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 2.58BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Geylang International is 40% better for: goals scored per game.

1.13 goals / game - Geylang International · 0.81 goals / game - Tanjong Pagar

Geylang International is 80% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - Geylang International · 3 goals / game - Tanjong Pagar

Geylang International scoring profile: very strong

Geylang International scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 meczów), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 16 meczów).

Tanjong Pagar scoring profile: mixed

Tanjong Pagar scores in 50% of games (8 of 16 meczów), while Geylang International keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).

17Goals scored (season)13
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
25Goals conceded (season)48
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
2.8Average goals per game3.81
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
5Goals scored (last 5)1
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
10Goals conceded (last 5)14
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal50%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
33%2 goals13%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
13%3 goals6%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
0%4 goals6%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal100%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
47%2 goals81%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
27%3 goals56%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
13%4 goals25%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

47%
Geylang International - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 15 meczów
51%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time19%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
20%Scored in both halves6%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS38%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
40%BTTS - last 520%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Geylang International is 216% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / game - Geylang International · 0.38 pts / game - Tanjong Pagar

Geylang International - half-time state
27% leading40% draw33% trailing
Tanjong Pagar - half-time state
6% leading19% draw75% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per game (1st half)0.38
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)1.5
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.75
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
53%Clean sheet before half-time6%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
53%No goal before half-time75%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per game (2nd half)0.69
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)1.5
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
1.47Average goals (2nd half)2.06
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
40%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar
60%No goal after half-time69%
Geylang InternationalTanjong Pagar

Geylang International - second-half results

20% W33% R47% P
18
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tanjong Pagar - second-half results

13% W31% R56% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-20
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 6%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Geylang International - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game1.40.6
Average goals per game2.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Tanjong Pagar - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.40
Goals scored / game0.20.0
Goals allowed / game1.21.6
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-5-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Geylang International
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
7
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
4
46-60
5
4
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Tanjong Pagar
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
1
6
16-30
3
12
31-45
1
5
46-60
5
7
61-75
3
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.30
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Geylang International

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

Tanjong Pagar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
41%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
188%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).

Teams vs league

Geylang InternationalLigaTanjong Pagar
Average goals per game 2.803.59 3.81
Both teams scored 47%51% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%73% 81%
Clean sheets 27%25% 0%
Goal before half-time 73%86% 100%
Goal after half-time 73%86% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.59
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / game
1.98
Away goals / game
+-19%
Home attack advantage
+-24%
Home defensive advantage
+-13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
62%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tanjong PagarSubstitutionOn: Matthew SilvaOff: Zaiful Nizam bin Abdullah
  2. Tanjong PagarGoalJunior Lougah Djile
  3. Geylang InternationalGoalRiku FukashiroAssist: Nikola Ignjatović
  4. Geylang InternationalSubstitutionOn: Vincent BezecourtOff: Iqram Rifqi bin Mohd Yazid
  5. Tanjong PagarYellow cardVabio Canavaro Araujo Santos Pires
  6. Tanjong PagarSubstitutionOn: Naqiuddin EunosOff: Israfil Mohamed
  7. Tanjong PagarYellow cardMuhammad Syahrul Bin Sazali
  8. Geylang InternationalGoalRyoya TaniguchiAssist: Kaisei Ogawa
  9. Geylang InternationalYellow cardShuhei Hoshino
  10. Tanjong PagarYellow cardMuhammad Raihan bin Abdul Rahman

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Geylang International's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Tanjong Pagar. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Tanjong Pagar
1 : 3
Geylang International
Geylang International
2 : 1
Tanjong Pagar

FAQ

What was the result of Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar?

The S.League match finished Geylang International 2:1 Tanjong Pagar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Geylang International and Tanjong Pagar?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Geylang International won 2, Tanjong Pagar won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar?

Geylang International score 1.13 goals per game on average and Tanjong Pagar 0.81. The S.League average is 3.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Geylang International's matches and 50% of Tanjong Pagar's.

What form are Geylang International and Tanjong Pagar in?

Over the last 5 games Geylang International have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tanjong Pagar 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Geylang International vs Tanjong Pagar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.