Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Gicumbi vs Amagaju: match statistics

Gicumbi crest
Gicumbi
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Amagaju crest
Amagaju
155%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Gicumbi holds a clear advantage over Amagaju in this clash. The hosts have a significantly better goal-scoring record at home (averaging 1.11 goals per match) compared to the visitors' mere 0.44 goals scored away. Amagaju sits at the bottom of the table with catastrophic form (only 0.4 points per match in their last 5 games) and a staggering 67% of away matches without a goal. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.05 vs 0.7), and Gicumbi has better shot accuracy (19% vs 12%). Although the hosts have been inconsistent, their offensive superiority and home advantage should decide the match in their favor. A draw is possible due to Gicumbi's occasional lack of consistency, but Amagaju's form makes their chances of earning points limited.

Gicumbi vs Amagaju: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gicumbi play Amagaju in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match date is 8 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Gicumbi: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Amagaju: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gicumbi scores 1.12 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Amagaju scores 0.56 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.12 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gicumbi 59%, Amagaju 26%. Over 2.5: Gicumbi 50%, Amagaju 21%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Gicumbi has higher xG: 1.13 vs 0.96. Gicumbi: 7.1 shots per match, Amagaju: 5.9.

Match halves

Gicumbi: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.53. Amagaju: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.26.

Goals by minute

Gicumbi: 31-45+ (9 goals). Amagaju: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.12 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Gicumbi holds a clear advantage over Amagaju in this clash. The hosts have a significantly better goal-scoring record at home (averaging 1.11 goals per match) compared to the visitors' mere 0.44 goals scored away. Amagaju sits at the bottom of the table with catastrophic form (only 0.4 points per match in their last 5 games) and a staggering 67% of away matches without a goal. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.05 vs 0.7), and Gicumbi has better shot accuracy (19% vs 12%). Although the hosts have been inconsistent, their offensive superiority and home advantage should decide the match in their favor. A draw is possible due to Gicumbi's occasional lack of consistency, but Amagaju's form makes their chances of earning points limited.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
GicumbiAmagaju
4Shots2
GicumbiAmagaju
1Shots on target1
GicumbiAmagaju
0.87xG0.49
GicumbiAmagaju
13Corners4
GicumbiAmagaju
73Dangerous attacks38
GicumbiAmagaju
15Fouls11
GicumbiAmagaju
0Cards0
GicumbiAmagaju

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.12Goals scored / match0.56
GicumbiAmagaju
1.59Goals conceded / match1.12
GicumbiAmagaju
49%Average possession46%
GicumbiAmagaju
2.35Shots on target / match1.62
GicumbiAmagaju

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.06Shots per match5.94
GicumbiAmagaju
2.35Shots on target1.62
GicumbiAmagaju
15.8%Shot conversion9.4%
GicumbiAmagaju
49%Possession46%
GicumbiAmagaju
1.13xG for0.96
GicumbiAmagaju
1.2xG against0.98
GicumbiAmagaju

Shooting quality

Gicumbi: Efficient finishingAmagaju: Balanced
GicumbiAmagaju
Accuracy (shots on target)33%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amagaju is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Gicumbi · 1.4 pts / match - Amagaju

Gicumbi
LWLWL
Season result split
29% W24% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-16
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-7
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Amagaju
LWWLD
Season result split
26% W24% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-17
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gicumbi is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Gicumbi · 0.56 goals / match - Amagaju

Amagaju is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - Gicumbi · 1.12 goals / match - Amagaju

Gicumbi scoring profile: strong

Gicumbi scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while Amagaju keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

Amagaju scoring profile: mixed

Amagaju scores in 41% of matches (14 of 34 matches), while Gicumbi keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

38Goals scored (season)19
GicumbiAmagaju
54Goals conceded (season)38
GicumbiAmagaju
2.71Average goals in match1.68
GicumbiAmagaju
7Goals scored (last 5)3
GicumbiAmagaju
10Goals conceded (last 5)4
GicumbiAmagaju

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal41%
GicumbiAmagaju
29%2 goals15%
GicumbiAmagaju
9%3 goals0%
GicumbiAmagaju
3%4 goals0%
GicumbiAmagaju

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal71%
GicumbiAmagaju
47%2 goals24%
GicumbiAmagaju
21%3 goals3%
GicumbiAmagaju
6%4 goals3%
GicumbiAmagaju

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

35%BTTS at half-time15%
GicumbiAmagaju
9%BTTS in both halves0%
GicumbiAmagaju
18%Scored in both halves9%
GicumbiAmagaju

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
GicumbiAmagaju
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
GicumbiAmagaju
80%BTTS - last 520%
GicumbiAmagaju

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
GicumbiAmagaju
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
GicumbiAmagaju
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
GicumbiAmagaju

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
GicumbiAmagaju
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time12%
GicumbiAmagaju
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
GicumbiAmagaju

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gicumbi is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Gicumbi · 0.91 pts / match - Amagaju

Gicumbi - half-time state
18% leading47% draw35% trailing
Amagaju - half-time state
12% leading56% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.91
GicumbiAmagaju
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.29
GicumbiAmagaju
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
GicumbiAmagaju
1.38Average goals (1st half)0.91
GicumbiAmagaju
38%Clean sheet before half-time53%
GicumbiAmagaju
50%No goal before half-time74%
GicumbiAmagaju

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)1.09
GicumbiAmagaju
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.26
GicumbiAmagaju
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
GicumbiAmagaju
1.32Average goals (2nd half)0.76
GicumbiAmagaju
38%Clean sheet after half-time62%
GicumbiAmagaju
62%No goal after half-time76%
GicumbiAmagaju

Gicumbi - second-half results

18% W44% R38% P
34
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amagaju - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding217%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gicumbi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Amagaju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.00.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gicumbi
ScoredConceded
5
11
0-15
6
7
16-30
9
9
31-45
2
7
46-60
8
8
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Amagaju
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
3
9
16-30
5
6
31-45
2
6
46-60
4
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gicumbi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
159%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Amagaju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+14.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

GicumbiLigaAmagaju
Average goals in match 2.712.12 1.68
Both teams scored 59%46% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%38% 21%
Clean sheets 18%34% 29%
Goal before half-time 76%61% 59%
Goal after half-time 76%70% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.12
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Gicumbi 1 - 0 - 0 Amagaju. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Amagaju
0 : 2
Gicumbi

FAQ

What was the result of Gicumbi vs Amagaju?

The National Soccer League match finished Gicumbi 1:1 Amagaju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Gicumbi vs Amagaju?

Gicumbi score 1.12 goals per game on average and Amagaju 0.56. The National Soccer League average is 2.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Gicumbi's matches and 26% of Amagaju's.

What form are Gicumbi and Amagaju in?

Over the last 5 games Gicumbi have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Amagaju 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gicumbi vs Amagaju?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.