Gillingham vs Barnet: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gillingham play Barnet in EFL League Two (England). The match date is 22 November 2025 at 13:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Gillingham: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Barnet: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gillingham scores 1.15 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Barnet scores 1.52 and concedes 1.15. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gillingham 54%, Barnet 57%. Over 2.5: Gillingham 46%, Barnet 48%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Barnet has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.44. Gillingham: 12.6 shots per match, Barnet: 14.2.

Match halves

Gillingham: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.76. Barnet: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Gillingham: 76-90+ (16 goals). Barnet: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 8.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
GillinghamBarnet
11Shots15
GillinghamBarnet
5Shots on target4
GillinghamBarnet
1.39xG1.66
GillinghamBarnet
2Corners7
GillinghamBarnet
49Dangerous attacks61
GillinghamBarnet
18Fouls9
GillinghamBarnet
4Cards3
GillinghamBarnet

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.15Goals scored / match1.52
GillinghamBarnet
1.57Goals conceded / match1.15
GillinghamBarnet
47%Average possession56%
GillinghamBarnet
4.07Shots on target / match4.76
GillinghamBarnet

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.63Shots per match14.22
GillinghamBarnet
4.07Shots on target4.76
GillinghamBarnet
9.1%Shot conversion10.7%
GillinghamBarnet
47%Possession56%
GillinghamBarnet
1.44xG for1.67
GillinghamBarnet
1.43xG against1.15
GillinghamBarnet

Shooting quality

Gillingham: BalancedBarnet: Dominant
GillinghamBarnet
Accuracy (shots on target)32%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Barnet is 275% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Gillingham · 3 pts / match - Barnet

Gillingham
DLLLW
Season result split
28% W30% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-14-19
1.15 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-7-8
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Barnet
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
46% W28% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-13-12
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
11-7-5
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.02Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Barnet is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

1.15 goals / match - Gillingham · 1.52 goals / match - Barnet

Barnet is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - Gillingham · 1.15 goals / match - Barnet

Gillingham scoring profile: strong

Gillingham scores in 74% of matches (34 of 46 matches), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 33% (15 of 46 matches).

Barnet scoring profile: very strong

Barnet scores in 80% of matches (37 of 46 matches), while Gillingham keeps a clean sheet in 24% (11 of 46 matches).

53Goals scored (season)70
GillinghamBarnet
72Goals conceded (season)53
GillinghamBarnet
2.72Average goals in match2.67
GillinghamBarnet
5Goals scored (last 5)18
GillinghamBarnet
12Goals conceded (last 5)8
GillinghamBarnet

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal80%
GillinghamBarnet
28%2 goals41%
GillinghamBarnet
11%3 goals17%
GillinghamBarnet
2%4 goals7%
GillinghamBarnet

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal67%
GillinghamBarnet
43%2 goals37%
GillinghamBarnet
17%3 goals9%
GillinghamBarnet
11%4 goals2%
GillinghamBarnet

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time33%
GillinghamBarnet
4%BTTS in both halves9%
GillinghamBarnet
15%Scored in both halves30%
GillinghamBarnet

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
GillinghamBarnet
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
GillinghamBarnet
60%BTTS - last 5100%
GillinghamBarnet

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
GillinghamBarnet
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
GillinghamBarnet
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
GillinghamBarnet

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
GillinghamBarnet
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
GillinghamBarnet
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
GillinghamBarnet

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Barnet is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Gillingham · 1.41 pts / match - Barnet

Gillingham - half-time state
20% leading48% draw33% trailing
Barnet - half-time state
30% leading50% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.41
GillinghamBarnet
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.74
GillinghamBarnet
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
GillinghamBarnet
1.09Average goals (1st half)1.33
GillinghamBarnet
61%Clean sheet before half-time54%
GillinghamBarnet
67%No goal before half-time43%
GillinghamBarnet

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.63
GillinghamBarnet
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
GillinghamBarnet
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
GillinghamBarnet
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.35
GillinghamBarnet
43%Clean sheet after half-time54%
GillinghamBarnet
43%No goal after half-time46%
GillinghamBarnet

Gillingham - second-half results

33% W35% R33% P
49
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding140%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Barnet - second-half results

43% W33% R24% P
65
Half-time points
34
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
75
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gillingham - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.2
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Barnet - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.60
Goals scored / match1.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match2.62.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+5+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 9

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gillingham
ScoredConceded
2
14
0-15
8
13
16-30
8
5
31-45
12
12
46-60
7
10
61-75
16
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Barnet
ScoredConceded
10
10
0-15
9
4
16-30
15
13
31-45
10
6
46-60
7
10
61-75
19
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+197%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gillingham

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Barnet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

GillinghamLigaBarnet
Average goals in match 2.722.57 2.67
Both teams scored 54%52% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%48% 48%
Clean sheets 24%27% 33%
Goal before half-time 57%67% 70%
Goal after half-time 83%78% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Gillingham 0 - 0 - 1 Barnet. Average goals 8.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Gillingham vs Barnet?

The EFL League Two match finished Gillingham 1:1 Barnet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Gillingham vs Barnet?

Gillingham score 1.15 goals per game on average and Barnet 1.52. The EFL League Two average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Gillingham's matches and 57% of Barnet's.

What form are Gillingham and Barnet in?

Over the last 5 games Gillingham have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Barnet 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gillingham vs Barnet?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gillingham vs Barnet: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.