Gillingham vs Barnet: match statistics
Gillingham vs Barnet: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gillingham played against Barnet in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on November 22, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Gillingham has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Barnet has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Gillingham scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.00. Barnet scores 1.25 and allows 1.06. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 56% of Gillingham's games and 44% of Barnet's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 38%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Barnet has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.46 per game. Gillingham takes 12.6 shots per game, while Barnet takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Gillingham leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Barnet leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gillingham's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Barnet, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League Two games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gillingham | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Barnet is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Gillingham · 1.2 pts / game - Barnet
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gillingham is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
1.38 goals / game - Gillingham · 1.25 goals / game - Barnet
Gillingham is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Gillingham · 1.06 goals / game - Barnet
Gillingham scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 meczów), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
Barnet scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Gillingham keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gillingham
Over / Under - Barnet
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barnet is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - Gillingham · 1.25 pts / game - Barnet
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gillingham - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Barnet - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gillingham
Barnet
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).
Teams vs league
| Gillingham | Liga | Barnet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.38 | 2.63 | ▼ 2.31 |
| Both teams scored | • 56% | 56% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 48% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 25% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 70% | • 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 75% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Gillingham vs Barnet?
The EFL League Two match finished Gillingham 1:1 Barnet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Gillingham vs Barnet?
Gillingham score 1.38 goals per game on average and Barnet 1.25. The EFL League Two average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Gillingham's matches and 44% of Barnet's.
What form are Gillingham and Barnet in?
Over the last 5 games Gillingham have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Barnet 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gillingham vs Barnet?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gillingham vs Barnet: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.