South Korea - K League 2Gimpo StadiumData current as of September 06, 2026

Gimpo Citizen vs Daegu: match statistics

Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Daegu crest
Daegu

Gimpo Citizen vs Daegu: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Gimpo Citizen played against Daegu in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on July 18, 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Gimpo Citizen has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Daegu has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Gimpo Citizen scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 1.13. Daegu scores 2.19 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Gimpo Citizen's games and 69% of Daegu's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 69%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Daegu has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 1.43 per game. Gimpo Citizen takes 11.5 shots per game, while Daegu takes 14.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Gimpo Citizen leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Daegu leads at halftime in 31% and scores 1.38 after halftime.

When the teams score

Gimpo Citizen's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Daegu, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gimpo Citizen have scored 19 goals at home this season (6 in the last 5 matches), while Daegu have 35 goals this season (10 in the last 5), clearly indicating the visitors’ attacking superiority. Daegu average 5.43 shots on target and 13.29 total shots away with a shooting efficiency of 17%, whereas Gimpo at home manage only 2.5 shots on target, 12 total shots and an 8% conversion rate, so the visitors create and convert more chances. Defensively Gimpo concede an average of 2.0 goals per home match and have yet to keep a clean sheet (0%), with an average xG against of 1.51 compared to Daegu’s 1.32, indicating greater vulnerability for the hosts. Additionally, Gimpo fail to score in 50% of home games while Daegu fail to score in only 14% of away fixtures; over the last 5 matches Gimpo average 1.4 points and Daegu 2.0 points, meaning the visitors are more productive. Considering the higher attacking xG 1.78 vs 1.44, better efficiency and an away win rate of 43% (vs Gimpo’s 0% home wins), I predict a Daegu victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal statistics strongly favor BTTS: home BTTS rate is 56%, away 86%, league average 63%, collectively indicating a high probability of both teams scoring. Both sides have high goals-per-game: Gimpo scores 2.11, Daegu 2.29, with goals conceded 1.33 and 1.43 respectively, so both teams statistically allow goals. In the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 60%; Daegu scored 10 goals in 5 matches (2.0 avg), Gimpo 6 goals (1.2) and conceded 8 (1.6), which confirms form conducive to Goal/Goal outcomes. xG metrics support this: season xG is 1.84 for Gimpo and 1.78 for Daegu, with xG against 1.40 and 1.32, and additionally matches over 2.5 goals occur in 67% and 71% for home and away. The only brake is Gimpo’s higher clean sheet expected rate—44% vs Daegu’s 14%—but given 56% vs 86% BTTS, xG values and over 2.5 at 67–71%, I pick BTTS - Yes (78%) versus 22% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG I expect about 1.58 goals for Gimpo ((1.84 + 1.32)/2) and 1.59 for Daegu ((1.78 + 1.40)/2), totaling 3.17 goals. Seasonal indicators confirm a tendency for high-scoring games: Gimpo has 67% of matches over 2.5 goals, Daegu 71%, and BTTS is 56% for Gimpo and as high as 86% for Daegu. Both teams create many chances: on average 14.67 and 13.29 shots with 5.89 and 5.43 on target and conversion rates of 14% vs 17%; in the last 5 matches Gimpo scored 6 goals (1.2 avg) and Daegu 10 (2.0), which supports a multi-goal scenario. A Poisson model with λ=3.17 yields ~82.5% for over 1.5, ~61.4% for over 2.5 and ~39.1% for over 3.5; after accounting for seasonal Over 2.5 rates (67%/71%) and the high BTTS I adjusted the probabilities to over1.5=83%, over2.5=67% and over3.5=48%. The best betting signal is Over 2.5 (over), because the expected 3.17 goals combined with strong seasonal Over 2.5 metrics and high BTTS provide the strongest edge on that line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

First-half statistics indicate that a draw at the break dominates for the home side: Gimpo led at half-time in only 2 matches (22%), whereas a half-time draw occurred in 6 fixtures (67%). The hosts have strong home results (67% home wins), but Daegu is in better form over the last five matches: 60% wins and an average of 2.0 goals per game (Gimpo in the last five: 40% and 1.2 goals). The second half is critical — second-half goals average 2.0 for the hosts and 2.29 for the visitors, with Gimpo scoring 1.33 and conceding 0.67 on average in the second half, and the share of matches with a goal after the break at 89% and 86%. Considering the dominant half-time draw (67%), the hosts' advantage in final results (67% home wins), the strong second-half numbers and xG 1.84 versus 1.78, the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time with a home win at full-time (X/1). I propose the following probability distribution: 1/1 18%, 1/X 3%, 1/2 2%, X/1 29%, X/X 19%, X/2 18%, 2/1 1%, 2/X 2%, 2/2 8%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

60Possession (%)40
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
25Shots14
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
8Shots on target5
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
2.98xG1.65
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
10Corners5
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
119Dangerous attacks58
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
5Fouls13
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
0Cards2
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Gimpo CitizenDaegu
1.19Goals scored / game2.19
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
1.13Goals allowed / game1.38
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
49%Average possession55%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
3.75Shots on target / game5.69
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.5Shots per game14.06
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
3.75Shots on target5.69
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
10.3%Shot conversion15.6%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
49%Possession55%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
1.43xG for1.81
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
1.25xG against1.37
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

Shooting quality

Gimpo Citizen: BalancedDaegu: Dominant
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
Accuracy (shots on target)33%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Daegu is 86% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen · 2.6 pts / game - Daegu

Gimpo Citizen
WWDLL
Season result split
38% W38% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-4
1.50 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Daegu
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
56% W25% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-3
1.94 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-1
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DDWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Daegu is 84% better for: goals scored per game.

1.19 goals / game - Gimpo Citizen · 2.19 goals / game - Daegu

Gimpo Citizen is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.13 goals / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.38 goals / game - Daegu

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Daegu keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).

Daegu scoring profile: very strong

Daegu scores in 94% of games (15 of 16 meczów), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).

19Goals scored (season)35
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
18Goals conceded (season)22
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
2.31Average goals per game3.56
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
5Goals scored (last 5)13
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal94%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
31%2 goals56%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
13%3 goals44%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
0%4 goals19%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal69%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
38%2 goals50%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
6%3 goals19%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
0%4 goals0%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time38%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
6%BTTS in both halves19%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
25%Scored in both halves44%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
40%BTTS - last 560%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Daegu is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.44 pts / game - Daegu

Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
25% leading56% draw19% trailing
Daegu - half-time state
31% leading50% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per game (1st half)1.44
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.81
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
1.06Average goals (1st half)1.44
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
50%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
56%No goal before half-time38%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.81
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)1.38
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
1.25Average goals (2nd half)2.13
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
56%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu
44%No goal after half-time25%
Gimpo CitizenDaegu

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

44% W19% R38% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Daegu - second-half results

50% W31% R19% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding181%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Gimpo Citizen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Daegu - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.60
Goals scored / game0.62.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.82.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+7
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Daegu
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
6
4
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
2
46-60
6
2
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.94
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+104%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

Daegu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
158%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimpo CitizenLigaDaegu
Average goals per game 2.312.79 3.56
Both teams scored 50%63% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%57% 69%
Clean sheets 31%22% 31%
Goal before half-time 63%73% 69%
Goal after half-time 88%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.39
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DaeguSubstitutionOn: Danrlei Medeiros MoreiraOff: In-Hyeok Park
  2. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Si-Heon LeeOff: Dong-Jin Park
  3. DaeguSubstitutionOn: Gi-Hyun ParkOff: Ju-Gong Kim
  4. DaeguYellow cardGi-Hyun Park
  5. DaeguSubstitutionOn: Jong-Mu HanOff: Dae-Woo Kim
  6. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Hak-Min LeeOff: Bu-Seong Jang
  7. DaeguYellow cardTae-Hee Han
  8. Gimpo CitizenGoalLuis Fabián Mina Zapata
  9. DaeguSubstitutionOn: Marcus DackersOff: Danrlei Medeiros Moreira
  10. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Kyung-Rok ParkOff: Chan-Hyung Lee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Gimpo Citizen's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Daegu. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Daegu?

The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 1:1 Daegu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Daegu?

Gimpo Citizen score 1.19 goals per game on average and Daegu 2.19. The K League 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 69% of Daegu's.

What form are Gimpo Citizen and Daegu in?

Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Daegu 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Daegu?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.