Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam: match statistics
Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Gimpo Citizen played Gyeongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Gimpo Citizen: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Gyeongnam: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Gimpo Citizen scores 1.17 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Gyeongnam scores 1.44 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.81 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Gimpo Citizen 56%, Gyeongnam 67%. Over 2.5: Gimpo Citizen 33%, Gyeongnam 50%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.39. Gimpo Citizen: 12.6 shots per match, Gyeongnam: 11.8.
Match halves
Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.67. Gyeongnam: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (9 goals). Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-2. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistics indicate an evenly matched game with a tilt toward a draw: Gimpo have 0% home wins and draw 75% of home matches, while Gyeongnam win only 13% away and draw 50% of their away fixtures. The hosts generate better chances — Gimpo’s home xG is 1.93 with 16.75 shots per game and 4.5 shots on target — yet this converts to just 1.00 goal per game and a 6% conversion rate. The visitors, however, are in better recent form: they have scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches and average 1.6 points per game over that period, whereas Gimpo have scored 4 goals and average 1.0 PPG. Defensively the differences are marginal (Gimpo concede 1.5 goals at home vs Gyeongnam conceding 1.38 goals away), but in the last 5 matches the hosts have shipped 7 goals compared to 4 for the visitors. Considering the high home draw rate (75%), Gimpo’s xG advantage paired with poor finishing, and the visitors’ superior recent form, the most likely outcome is a draw (55%), with a 25% probability of a home win and 20% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams present a strong BTTS signal this season: home side has BTTS in 70% of matches, away side 63%, with the league average at 63%. Scoring stats show Gimpo averages 1.9 goals scored and concedes 1.5 per game, while Gyeongnam scores 0.88 and concedes 1.38, indicating both teams regularly allow opponents scoring opportunities. In the last 5 matches both teams had BTTS at 60%: hosts scored 4 goals (0.8/match) and conceded 7 (1.4/match), while guests scored 9 goals (1.8/match) and conceded 4 (0.8/match), so the visitors have been noticeably more efficient offensively recently. This is confirmed by xG values: season xG 1.39 vs 1.38 and recent xG 1.66 for the hosts and 1.91 for the visitors, with average shots on target 4.0 vs 3.38 and shot conversion 16% vs 8%, suggesting both sides create genuine scoring chances. Additionally the away team has 0% clean sheets this season (hosts 20%), so it is more likely both teams will score — BTTS forecast: Yes 78%, No 22%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project total goals around 2.78: combined xG is 1.39 + 1.38 = 2.77, and seasonal goals averages are 1.9 (Gimpo) + 0.88 (Gyeongnam) = 2.78. Strong signal for Over 1.5 comes from seasonal percentages: Gimpo has 80% of matches >1.5, Gyeongnam 88% — average 84%, which combined with the league mean of 2.78 gives me an Over 1.5 rating of 86%. Additionally, both teams frequently concede or score at least one goal: BTTS occurs in 70% of Gimpo matches and 63% of Gyeongnam matches, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. The 2.5 line is more balanced: Gimpo has 80% of matches >2.5, Gyeongnam only 13%, and the combined xG ~2.77 together with Gimpo’s superior conversion (16% vs 8%) suggest a moderate Over 2.5 probability of about 60%. I lean Under 3.5 — only 50% of Gimpo matches and 13% of Gyeongnam matches exceed that threshold, and the expected 2.78 is well below 3.5, so Under 3.5 is rated at 72%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win): a draw at the break occurs in 40% of Gimpo’s matches, and the home side shows a clear advantage after the interval – averaging 2.1 goals in the second half and 1.2 goals scored in the second half versus 1.0 and 0.5 for Gyeongnam. Across the season Gimpo scores 1.9 goals per match compared to 0.88 for opponents and converts shots twice as efficiently (16% vs 8%), which increases the chances of a turnaround after half-time. Home teams were leading at the break in 30% of matches, and a lead at the break was held until full-time in 50% of those cases, so the 1/1 scenario also has a significant share. At the same time, the last five matches show Gimpo’s first-half issues (0.0 goals at half-time and 60% of cases where the home side was trailing at the break), hence I also allow for the 2/1 scenario as a possible turnaround variant.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Gimpo Citizen | Gyeongnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gyeongnam is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.8 pts / match - Gyeongnam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gyeongnam is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.44 goals / match - Gyeongnam
Gimpo Citizen is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.11 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.44 goals / match - Gyeongnam
Gimpo Citizen scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).
Gyeongnam scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Gimpo Citizen
Over / Under — Gyeongnam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Gimpo Citizen is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 0.94 pts / match - Gyeongnam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gimpo Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gyeongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Gimpo Citizen
Gyeongnam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Gimpo Citizen | Liga | Gyeongnam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.28 | 2.81 | • 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 22% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 78% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Gimpo Citizen 2 - 0 - 2 Gyeongnam. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam?
The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 1:1 Gyeongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gimpo Citizen and Gyeongnam?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gimpo Citizen won 2, Gyeongnam won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam?
Gimpo Citizen score 1.17 goals per game on average and Gyeongnam 1.44. The K League 2 average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 67% of Gyeongnam's.
What form are Gimpo Citizen and Gyeongnam in?
Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Gyeongnam 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam?
The statistical background for Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


