South Korea - K League 2Gimpo StadiumData current as of 06 August 2026

Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam: match statistics

Gimpo Citizen crest
Gimpo Citizen
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam

Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Gimpo Citizen played Gyeongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Gimpo Citizen: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Gyeongnam: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Gimpo Citizen scores 1.17 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Gyeongnam scores 1.44 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.81 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Gimpo Citizen 56%, Gyeongnam 67%. Over 2.5: Gimpo Citizen 33%, Gyeongnam 50%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.39. Gimpo Citizen: 12.6 shots per match, Gyeongnam: 11.8.

Match halves

Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.67. Gyeongnam: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (9 goals). Gyeongnam: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-2. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistics indicate an evenly matched game with a tilt toward a draw: Gimpo have 0% home wins and draw 75% of home matches, while Gyeongnam win only 13% away and draw 50% of their away fixtures. The hosts generate better chances — Gimpo’s home xG is 1.93 with 16.75 shots per game and 4.5 shots on target — yet this converts to just 1.00 goal per game and a 6% conversion rate. The visitors, however, are in better recent form: they have scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches and average 1.6 points per game over that period, whereas Gimpo have scored 4 goals and average 1.0 PPG. Defensively the differences are marginal (Gimpo concede 1.5 goals at home vs Gyeongnam conceding 1.38 goals away), but in the last 5 matches the hosts have shipped 7 goals compared to 4 for the visitors. Considering the high home draw rate (75%), Gimpo’s xG advantage paired with poor finishing, and the visitors’ superior recent form, the most likely outcome is a draw (55%), with a 25% probability of a home win and 20% for an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams present a strong BTTS signal this season: home side has BTTS in 70% of matches, away side 63%, with the league average at 63%. Scoring stats show Gimpo averages 1.9 goals scored and concedes 1.5 per game, while Gyeongnam scores 0.88 and concedes 1.38, indicating both teams regularly allow opponents scoring opportunities. In the last 5 matches both teams had BTTS at 60%: hosts scored 4 goals (0.8/match) and conceded 7 (1.4/match), while guests scored 9 goals (1.8/match) and conceded 4 (0.8/match), so the visitors have been noticeably more efficient offensively recently. This is confirmed by xG values: season xG 1.39 vs 1.38 and recent xG 1.66 for the hosts and 1.91 for the visitors, with average shots on target 4.0 vs 3.38 and shot conversion 16% vs 8%, suggesting both sides create genuine scoring chances. Additionally the away team has 0% clean sheets this season (hosts 20%), so it is more likely both teams will score — BTTS forecast: Yes 78%, No 22%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project total goals around 2.78: combined xG is 1.39 + 1.38 = 2.77, and seasonal goals averages are 1.9 (Gimpo) + 0.88 (Gyeongnam) = 2.78. Strong signal for Over 1.5 comes from seasonal percentages: Gimpo has 80% of matches >1.5, Gyeongnam 88% — average 84%, which combined with the league mean of 2.78 gives me an Over 1.5 rating of 86%. Additionally, both teams frequently concede or score at least one goal: BTTS occurs in 70% of Gimpo matches and 63% of Gyeongnam matches, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. The 2.5 line is more balanced: Gimpo has 80% of matches >2.5, Gyeongnam only 13%, and the combined xG ~2.77 together with Gimpo’s superior conversion (16% vs 8%) suggest a moderate Over 2.5 probability of about 60%. I lean Under 3.5 — only 50% of Gimpo matches and 13% of Gyeongnam matches exceed that threshold, and the expected 2.78 is well below 3.5, so Under 3.5 is rated at 72%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win): a draw at the break occurs in 40% of Gimpo’s matches, and the home side shows a clear advantage after the interval – averaging 2.1 goals in the second half and 1.2 goals scored in the second half versus 1.0 and 0.5 for Gyeongnam. Across the season Gimpo scores 1.9 goals per match compared to 0.88 for opponents and converts shots twice as efficiently (16% vs 8%), which increases the chances of a turnaround after half-time. Home teams were leading at the break in 30% of matches, and a lead at the break was held until full-time in 50% of those cases, so the 1/1 scenario also has a significant share. At the same time, the last five matches show Gimpo’s first-half issues (0.0 goals at half-time and 60% of cases where the home side was trailing at the break), hence I also allow for the 2/1 scenario as a possible turnaround variant.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
20Shots8
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
10Shots on target1
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
2.56xG0.93
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
5Corners5
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
83Dangerous attacks47
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
14Fouls13
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
3Cards2
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
1.17Goals scored / match1.44
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
1.11Goals conceded / match1.44
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
51%Average possession50%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
4.06Shots on target / match3.72
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.61Shots per match11.78
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
4.06Shots on target3.72
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
9.3%Shot conversion12.3%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
51%Possession50%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
1.54xG for1.39
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
1.26xG against1.25
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

Shooting quality

Gimpo Citizen: BalancedGyeongnam: Balanced
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
Accuracy (shots on target)32%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gyeongnam is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.8 pts / match - Gyeongnam

Gimpo Citizen
DLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W44% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-4
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-3-1
Last 5 at home
0-3-1
DLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Gyeongnam
DWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-6
1.33 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.93Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gyeongnam is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.44 goals / match - Gyeongnam

Gimpo Citizen is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen · 1.44 goals / match - Gyeongnam

Gimpo Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Gimpo Citizen scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

Gyeongnam scoring profile: very strong

Gyeongnam scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

21Goals scored (season)26
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
20Goals conceded (season)26
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
2.28Average goals in match2.89
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
4Goals scored (last 5)11
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal78%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
28%2 goals39%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
11%3 goals17%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
0%4 goals6%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal89%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
33%2 goals44%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
6%3 goals6%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
0%4 goals6%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time28%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
22%Scored in both halves28%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
60%BTTS - last 580%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gimpo Citizen is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.22 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen · 0.94 pts / match - Gyeongnam

Gimpo Citizen - half-time state
22% leading56% draw22% trailing
Gyeongnam - half-time state
17% leading44% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.22Points per match (1st half)0.94
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
1Average goals (1st half)1.28
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
61%No goal before half-time56%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)1.39
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.72
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
1.28Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
56%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam
39%No goal after half-time39%
Gimpo CitizenGyeongnam

Gimpo Citizen - second-half results

44% W22% R33% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gyeongnam - second-half results

33% W39% R28% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gimpo Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gyeongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Gimpo Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
5
8
31-45
2
2
46-60
5
3
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Gimpo Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Gimpo CitizenLigaGyeongnam
Average goals in match 2.282.81 2.89
Both teams scored 56%63% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%56% 50%
Clean sheets 28%22% 11%
Goal before half-time 61%72% 67%
Goal after half-time 89%78% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.81
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimpo CitizenGoalLuis Fabián Mina Zapata
  2. GyeongnamYellow cardMin-su Jeon
  3. GyeongnamGoalHyeon-Oh KimAssist: Sang-Jun Cho
  4. GyeongnamYellow cardHo-Jun Son
  5. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Chan-Dong LeeOff: Min-su Jeon
  6. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Yong-Hyuk LeeOff: Chan-Hyung Lee
  7. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Heon-Jae LeeOff: Ki-Pyo Kwon
  8. Gimpo CitizenSubstitutionOn: Jae-Woon YoonOff: Min-Sik Kim
  9. Gimpo CitizenYellow cardBo-Sang Yoon
  10. GyeongnamSubstitutionOn: Felipe Guilherme Santos FonsecaOff: Sang-Jun Cho

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Gimpo Citizen 2 - 0 - 2 Gyeongnam. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Gyeongnam
1 : 0
Gimpo Citizen
Gyeongnam FC
0 : 2
Gimpo Citizen FC
Gimpo Citizen FC
3 : 0
Gyeongnam FC
Gyeongnam FC
2 : 1
Gimpo Citizen FC

FAQ

What was the result of Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam?

The K League 2 match finished Gimpo Citizen 1:1 Gyeongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Gimpo Citizen and Gyeongnam?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gimpo Citizen won 2, Gyeongnam won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam?

Gimpo Citizen score 1.17 goals per game on average and Gyeongnam 1.44. The K League 2 average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 67% of Gyeongnam's.

What form are Gimpo Citizen and Gyeongnam in?

Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Gyeongnam 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam?

The statistical background for Gimpo Citizen vs Gyeongnam — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.