Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gimpo Citizen plays Seongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The game is scheduled for September 6, 2026. Venue: Gimpo Stadium.
Recent form
Gimpo Citizen has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Seongnam has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Gimpo Citizen scores 1.23 goals per game and allows 1.18. Seongnam scores 1.09 and allows 1.18. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Gimpo Citizen's games and 64% of Seongnam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 41%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Gimpo Citizen has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.52 per game. Gimpo Citizen takes 12.9 shots per game, while Seongnam takes 12.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Gimpo Citizen leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. Seongnam leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gimpo Citizen's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Seongnam, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 4 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gimpo Citizen | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Seongnam is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.4 pts / game - Seongnam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gimpo Citizen is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.23 goals / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.09 goals / game - Seongnam
Gimpo Citizen scores in 82% of games (18 of 22 meczów), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 meczów).
Seongnam scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 meczów), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gimpo Citizen
Over / Under - Seongnam
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seongnam is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.23 pts / game - Gimpo Citizen · 1.45 pts / game - Seongnam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gimpo Citizen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 27%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gimpo Citizen
Seongnam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Gimpo Citizen | Liga | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.41 | 2.72 | ▼ 2.27 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 59% | 63% | • 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 54% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 22% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 68% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 78% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Gimpo Citizen's perspective: 0 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses against Seongnam. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
When do Gimpo Citizen and Seongnam play?
Gimpo Citizen face Seongnam on September 6, 2026 in K League 2 at Gimpo Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gimpo Citizen and Seongnam?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gimpo Citizen won 0, Seongnam won 0 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam?
Gimpo Citizen score 1.23 goals per game on average and Seongnam 1.09. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Gimpo Citizen's matches and 64% of Seongnam's.
What form are Gimpo Citizen and Seongnam in?
Over the last 5 games Gimpo Citizen have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Seongnam 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gimpo Citizen vs Seongnam: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.