Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 17 July 2026

Grasshopper vs Servette: match statistics

Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Servette crest
Servette

Grasshopper vs Servette: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grasshopper play Servette in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 3 May 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Grasshopper: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Servette: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grasshopper scores 1.26 and concedes 1.95 goals per match. Servette scores 1.87 and concedes 1.66. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grasshopper 61%, Servette 68%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 58%, Servette 61%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Servette has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.41. Grasshopper: 12.5 shots per match, Servette: 13.7.

Match halves

Grasshopper: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.66. Servette: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 1.11.

Goals by minute

Grasshopper: 76-90+ (11 goals). Servette: 76-90+ (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I back the away win (2). Servette have scored 15 goals in their last 5 matches (3.0 per match) with a 3-1-1 record in that span, whereas Grasshopper have scored just 3 goals in their last 5 (0.6 per match) and have won 1 of 5. At home Grasshopper average 1.35 goals scored and concede 1.76 per match (home goal difference -7), while Servette away average 1.69 scored and 1.94 conceded (away goal difference -4); shot conversion is 10% versus 13% in favor of the visitors, with xG 1.45 for Grasshopper and 1.51 for Servette. Grasshopper have conceded 13 goals in the last 5 matches and have 18% of home games without scoring, while Servette have conceded 7 in five and have 0% of away matches without a goal, indicating an offensive edge and greater consistency for the visitors. Considering the form gap (average 0.6 points per match for Grasshopper vs 2.0 for Servette over the last 5), better finishing and superiority in goals scored, I assess probabilities at 60% for Servette, 22% for a draw and 18% for a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
GrasshopperServette
7Shots15
GrasshopperServette
0Shots on target3
GrasshopperServette
0.56xG1.78
GrasshopperServette
2Corners3
GrasshopperServette
15Dangerous attacks86
GrasshopperServette
10Fouls12
GrasshopperServette
4Cards2
GrasshopperServette

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

GrasshopperServette
1.26Goals scored / match1.87
GrasshopperServette
1.95Goals conceded / match1.66
GrasshopperServette
45%Average possession52%
GrasshopperServette
4.34Shots on target / match4.82
GrasshopperServette

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match13.74
GrasshopperServette
4.34Shots on target4.82
GrasshopperServette
10.1%Shot conversion13.6%
GrasshopperServette
45%Possession52%
GrasshopperServette
1.41xG for1.59
GrasshopperServette
1.62xG against1.36
GrasshopperServette

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: BalancedServette: Efficient finishing
GrasshopperServette
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Servette is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Grasshopper · 2.6 pts / match - Servette

Grasshopper
LLLWW
Season result split
21% W24% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-21
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-10
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Servette
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
34% W37% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-14-11
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Servette is 48% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.87 goals / match - Servette

Servette is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.95 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.66 goals / match - Servette

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Servette keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

Servette scoring profile: very strong

Servette scores in 89% of matches (34 of 38 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

48Goals scored (season)71
GrasshopperServette
74Goals conceded (season)63
GrasshopperServette
3.21Average goals in match3.53
GrasshopperServette
8Goals scored (last 5)14
GrasshopperServette
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
GrasshopperServette

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal89%
GrasshopperServette
29%2 goals53%
GrasshopperServette
18%3 goals26%
GrasshopperServette
3%4 goals13%
GrasshopperServette

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal76%
GrasshopperServette
53%2 goals45%
GrasshopperServette
26%3 goals34%
GrasshopperServette
16%4 goals11%
GrasshopperServette

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time29%
GrasshopperServette
11%BTTS in both halves13%
GrasshopperServette
24%Scored in both halves37%
GrasshopperServette

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
GrasshopperServette
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
GrasshopperServette
80%BTTS - last 540%
GrasshopperServette

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
GrasshopperServette
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
GrasshopperServette
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
GrasshopperServette

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
GrasshopperServette
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
GrasshopperServette
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
GrasshopperServette

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper - half-time state
29% leading34% draw37% trailing
Servette - half-time state
32% leading32% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.26
GrasshopperServette
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.76
GrasshopperServette
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
GrasshopperServette
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.63
GrasshopperServette
45%Clean sheet before half-time47%
GrasshopperServette
55%No goal before half-time45%
GrasshopperServette

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)1.58
GrasshopperServette
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)1.11
GrasshopperServette
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
GrasshopperServette
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.89
GrasshopperServette
29%Clean sheet after half-time45%
GrasshopperServette
50%No goal after half-time29%
GrasshopperServette

Grasshopper - second-half results

18% W34% R47% P
46
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Servette - second-half results

45% W24% R32% P
48
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
60
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding106%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Servette - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.602.40
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
9
11
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
11
31-45
5
13
46-60
9
19
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Servette
ScoredConceded
10
14
0-15
11
9
16-30
8
10
31-45
12
11
46-60
10
10
61-75
20
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.37
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Servette

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaServette
Average goals in match 3.213.29 3.53
Both teams scored 61%66% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%67% 61%
Clean sheets 13%19% 24%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 79%
Goal after half-time 84%85% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Grasshopper 0 - 1 - 2 Servette. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Grasshopper vs Servette?

The Super League match finished Grasshopper 0:2 Servette. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grasshopper and Servette?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Grasshopper won 0, Servette won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Servette?

Grasshopper score 1.26 goals per game on average and Servette 1.87. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Grasshopper's matches and 68% of Servette's.

What form are Grasshopper and Servette in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Servette 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Servette?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Grasshopper vs Servette: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.