Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Grasshopper vs Thun: match statistics

Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
1 : 3half-time 0:2
Thun crest
Thun
125%(3.00)
X20%(3.40)
255%(2.10)

Thun sits top of the table and displays far superior form to Grasshopper, who are placed 11th. The visitors have won an impressive 78% of their away matches this season, recording 13 wins and just 5 losses. Thun has not failed to score in a single away match (FTS% 0%), averaging 2.11 goals per game on the road, which significantly exceeds Grasshopper's 1.67 goals at home. Recent form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (PPG 1.8 vs 1.2), and Thun's positive away goal difference (+9) compared to Grasshopper's home record (+1) confirms the visitors' advantage. xG statistics also point to Thun's higher offensive efficiency (1.88 xG) combined with a solid defense, making them the favorites for this encounter.

Grasshopper vs Thun: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grasshopper play Thun in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 18 January 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Grasshopper: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Thun: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grasshopper scores 1.26 and concedes 1.95 goals per match. Thun scores 2.11 and concedes 1.37. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grasshopper 61%, Thun 71%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 58%, Thun 74%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Thun has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.41. Grasshopper: 12.5 shots per match, Thun: 17.1.

Match halves

Grasshopper: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.66. Thun: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.21.

Goals by minute

Grasshopper: 76-90+ (11 goals). Thun: 46-60 (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Thun sits top of the table and displays far superior form to Grasshopper, who are placed 11th. The visitors have won an impressive 78% of their away matches this season, recording 13 wins and just 5 losses. Thun has not failed to score in a single away match (FTS% 0%), averaging 2.11 goals per game on the road, which significantly exceeds Grasshopper's 1.67 goals at home. Recent form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (PPG 1.8 vs 1.2), and Thun's positive away goal difference (+9) compared to Grasshopper's home record (+1) confirms the visitors' advantage. xG statistics also point to Thun's higher offensive efficiency (1.88 xG) combined with a solid defense, making them the favorites for this encounter.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
GrasshopperThun
8Shots20
GrasshopperThun
2Shots on target8
GrasshopperThun
0.96xG2.31
GrasshopperThun
1Corners8
GrasshopperThun
43Dangerous attacks69
GrasshopperThun
13Fouls10
GrasshopperThun
4Cards1
GrasshopperThun

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.26Goals scored / match2.11
GrasshopperThun
1.95Goals conceded / match1.37
GrasshopperThun
45%Average possession46%
GrasshopperThun
4.34Shots on target / match5.66
GrasshopperThun

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match17.05
GrasshopperThun
4.34Shots on target5.66
GrasshopperThun
10.1%Shot conversion12.3%
GrasshopperThun
45%Possession46%
GrasshopperThun
1.41xG for1.87
GrasshopperThun
1.62xG against1.65
GrasshopperThun

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: BalancedThun: Counter-attacking
GrasshopperThun
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grasshopper is 500% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Grasshopper · 0.2 pts / match - Thun

Grasshopper
LLLWW
Season result split
21% W24% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-21
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-10
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Thun
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
63% W8% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
24-3-11
1.97 pts / match · goal difference +28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
12-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 2.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Thun is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - Grasshopper · 2.11 goals / match - Thun

Thun is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.95 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.37 goals / match - Thun

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).

Thun scoring profile: very strong

Thun scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

48Goals scored (season)80
GrasshopperThun
74Goals conceded (season)52
GrasshopperThun
3.21Average goals in match3.47
GrasshopperThun
8Goals scored (last 5)5
GrasshopperThun
9Goals conceded (last 5)15
GrasshopperThun

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal87%
GrasshopperThun
29%2 goals63%
GrasshopperThun
18%3 goals37%
GrasshopperThun
3%4 goals18%
GrasshopperThun

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal84%
GrasshopperThun
53%2 goals26%
GrasshopperThun
26%3 goals11%
GrasshopperThun
16%4 goals5%
GrasshopperThun

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time29%
GrasshopperThun
11%BTTS in both halves3%
GrasshopperThun
24%Scored in both halves39%
GrasshopperThun

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS66%
GrasshopperThun
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
GrasshopperThun
80%BTTS - last 560%
GrasshopperThun

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
GrasshopperThun
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
GrasshopperThun
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
GrasshopperThun

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
GrasshopperThun
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
GrasshopperThun
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
GrasshopperThun

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Thun is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.61 pts / match - Thun

Grasshopper - half-time state
29% leading34% draw37% trailing
Thun - half-time state
42% leading34% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.61
GrasshopperThun
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.89
GrasshopperThun
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
GrasshopperThun
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.55
GrasshopperThun
45%Clean sheet before half-time50%
GrasshopperThun
55%No goal before half-time45%
GrasshopperThun

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)1.74
GrasshopperThun
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)1.21
GrasshopperThun
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
GrasshopperThun
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.92
GrasshopperThun
29%Clean sheet after half-time50%
GrasshopperThun
50%No goal after half-time29%
GrasshopperThun

Grasshopper - second-half results

18% W34% R47% P
46
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Thun - second-half results

47% W32% R21% P
61
Half-time points
34
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
66
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Thun - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.8
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
9
11
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
11
31-45
5
13
46-60
9
19
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Thun
ScoredConceded
9
8
0-15
11
9
16-30
14
8
31-45
17
5
46-60
12
7
61-75
17
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.34
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Thun

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaThun
Average goals in match 3.213.29 3.47
Both teams scored 61%66% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%67% 74%
Clean sheets 13%19% 16%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 76%
Goal after half-time 84%85% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Grasshopper 0 - 1 - 1 Thun. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Thun
5 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich
FC Thun
1 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich

FAQ

What was the result of Grasshopper vs Thun?

The Super League match finished Grasshopper 1:3 Thun. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grasshopper and Thun?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Grasshopper won 0, Thun won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Thun?

Grasshopper score 1.26 goals per game on average and Thun 2.11. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Grasshopper's matches and 71% of Thun's.

What form are Grasshopper and Thun in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Thun 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Thun?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.