Grasshopper vs Thun: match statistics
Thun sits top of the table and displays far superior form to Grasshopper, who are placed 11th. The visitors have won an impressive 78% of their away matches this season, recording 13 wins and just 5 losses. Thun has not failed to score in a single away match (FTS% 0%), averaging 2.11 goals per game on the road, which significantly exceeds Grasshopper's 1.67 goals at home. Recent form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (PPG 1.8 vs 1.2), and Thun's positive away goal difference (+9) compared to Grasshopper's home record (+1) confirms the visitors' advantage. xG statistics also point to Thun's higher offensive efficiency (1.88 xG) combined with a solid defense, making them the favorites for this encounter.
Grasshopper vs Thun: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Grasshopper played against Thun in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on January 18, 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Grasshopper has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Thun has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Grasshopper scores 1.37 goals per game and allows 1.84. Thun scores 2.05 and allows 1.21. Games in this league average 3.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of Grasshopper's games and 68% of Thun's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 74%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Thun has the higher season xG average, 1.99 to 1.51 per game. Grasshopper takes 13.3 shots per game, while Thun takes 18.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Grasshopper leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. Thun leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.11 after halftime.
When the teams score
Grasshopper's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Thun, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.27 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Thun sits top of the table and displays far superior form to Grasshopper, who are placed 11th. The visitors have won an impressive 78% of their away matches this season, recording 13 wins and just 5 losses. Thun has not failed to score in a single away match (FTS% 0%), averaging 2.11 goals per game on the road, which significantly exceeds Grasshopper's 1.67 goals at home. Recent form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (PPG 1.8 vs 1.2), and Thun's positive away goal difference (+9) compared to Grasshopper's home record (+1) confirms the visitors' advantage. xG statistics also point to Thun's higher offensive efficiency (1.88 xG) combined with a solid defense, making them the favorites for this encounter.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Grasshopper | Thun | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Thun is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Grasshopper · 1.8 pts / game - Thun
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Thun is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.37 goals / game - Grasshopper · 2.05 goals / game - Thun
Thun is 52% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.84 goals / game - Grasshopper · 1.21 goals / game - Thun
Grasshopper scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 meczów), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
Thun scores in 89% of games (17 of 19 meczów), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Grasshopper
Over / Under - Thun
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Thun is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / game - Grasshopper · 1.58 pts / game - Thun
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 21%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Thun - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 68%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Grasshopper
Thun
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Grasshopper | Liga | Thun | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.21 | 3.27 | • 3.26 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 63% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 58% | 68% | ▲ 74% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 21% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 75% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 82% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Grasshopper's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Thun. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Grasshopper vs Thun?
The Super League match finished Grasshopper 1:3 Thun. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Thun?
Grasshopper score 1.37 goals per game on average and Thun 2.05. The Super League average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Grasshopper's matches and 68% of Thun's.
What form are Grasshopper and Thun in?
Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Thun 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Thun?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.