Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Grasshopper vs Winterthur: match statistics

Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
3 : 2half-time 0:2
Winterthur crest
Winterthur

Grasshopper vs Winterthur: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grasshopper play Winterthur in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 12 May 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Grasshopper: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Winterthur: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grasshopper scores 1.26 and concedes 1.95 goals per match. Winterthur scores 1.16 and concedes 2.63. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grasshopper 61%, Winterthur 68%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 58%, Winterthur 79%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Grasshopper has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.32. Grasshopper: 12.5 shots per match, Winterthur: 11.8.

Match halves

Grasshopper: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.66. Winterthur: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Grasshopper: 76-90+ (11 goals). Winterthur: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I predict a home win because Grasshopper display a clear defensive edge and slightly superior offensive output. The hosts concede 1.78 goals per home match on average, while Winterthur concede 3.00 on the road; this season the visitors have conceded 94 goals versus Grasshopper’s 71. At home Grasshopper score 1.28 goals on average with an xG of 1.40 from 12.67 shots and 4.00 on target, whereas visitors score 1.06 on the road with an xG of 1.25 from 10.83 shots and 3.94 on target, indicating higher quality chances for the hosts. Both teams are in poor form — Grasshopper over the last 5 matches have 1 win and 4 losses, averaging 0.6 points per match, while Winterthur in their last 5 have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, averaging 0.8 points per match; additionally the visitors have conceded 12 goals in that period versus 8 for the hosts. Winterthur also have 0% clean sheets on the road and fail to score in 39% of their away matches, compared to Grasshopper’s 11% clean sheets and 22% of matches without scoring, which increases the likelihood of goals for the hosts and leads me to back their victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
GrasshopperWinterthur
14Shots14
GrasshopperWinterthur
6Shots on target5
GrasshopperWinterthur
1.76xG1.55
GrasshopperWinterthur
10Corners6
GrasshopperWinterthur
62Dangerous attacks44
GrasshopperWinterthur
11Fouls12
GrasshopperWinterthur
5Cards1
GrasshopperWinterthur

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

GrasshopperWinterthur
1.26Goals scored / match1.16
GrasshopperWinterthur
1.95Goals conceded / match2.63
GrasshopperWinterthur
45%Average possession44%
GrasshopperWinterthur
4.34Shots on target / match4.08
GrasshopperWinterthur

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match11.76
GrasshopperWinterthur
4.34Shots on target4.08
GrasshopperWinterthur
10.1%Shot conversion9.8%
GrasshopperWinterthur
45%Possession44%
GrasshopperWinterthur
1.41xG for1.32
GrasshopperWinterthur
1.62xG against2.13
GrasshopperWinterthur

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: BalancedWinterthur: Balanced
GrasshopperWinterthur
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grasshopper is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Grasshopper · 0.8 pts / match - Winterthur

Grasshopper
LLLWW
Season result split
21% W24% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-21
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-10
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Winterthur
LDWLL
Season result split
13% W21% R66% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-8-25
0.61 pts / match · goal difference -56
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-14
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 2.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Grasshopper is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - Grasshopper · 1.16 goals / match - Winterthur

Grasshopper is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.95 goals / match - Grasshopper · 2.63 goals / match - Winterthur

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Winterthur keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 38 matches).

Winterthur scoring profile: very strong

Winterthur scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

48Goals scored (season)44
GrasshopperWinterthur
74Goals conceded (season)100
GrasshopperWinterthur
3.21Average goals in match3.79
GrasshopperWinterthur
8Goals scored (last 5)9
GrasshopperWinterthur
9Goals conceded (last 5)14
GrasshopperWinterthur

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal68%
GrasshopperWinterthur
29%2 goals37%
GrasshopperWinterthur
18%3 goals8%
GrasshopperWinterthur
3%4 goals3%
GrasshopperWinterthur

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal100%
GrasshopperWinterthur
53%2 goals76%
GrasshopperWinterthur
26%3 goals47%
GrasshopperWinterthur
16%4 goals24%
GrasshopperWinterthur

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time18%
GrasshopperWinterthur
11%BTTS in both halves5%
GrasshopperWinterthur
24%Scored in both halves24%
GrasshopperWinterthur

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
GrasshopperWinterthur
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
GrasshopperWinterthur
80%BTTS - last 580%
GrasshopperWinterthur

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
GrasshopperWinterthur
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
GrasshopperWinterthur
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
GrasshopperWinterthur

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
GrasshopperWinterthur
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time66%
GrasshopperWinterthur
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
GrasshopperWinterthur

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.03 pts / match - Winterthur

Grasshopper - half-time state
29% leading34% draw37% trailing
Winterthur - half-time state
26% leading24% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.03
GrasshopperWinterthur
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.53
GrasshopperWinterthur
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)1.08
GrasshopperWinterthur
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.61
GrasshopperWinterthur
45%Clean sheet before half-time39%
GrasshopperWinterthur
55%No goal before half-time58%
GrasshopperWinterthur

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)0.63
GrasshopperWinterthur
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
GrasshopperWinterthur
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)1.55
GrasshopperWinterthur
1.74Average goals (2nd half)2.18
GrasshopperWinterthur
29%Clean sheet after half-time13%
GrasshopperWinterthur
50%No goal after half-time50%
GrasshopperWinterthur

Grasshopper - second-half results

18% W34% R47% P
46
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Winterthur - second-half results

13% W24% R63% P
39
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-21
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-35
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Winterthur - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.8
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
9
11
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
11
31-45
5
13
46-60
9
19
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Winterthur
ScoredConceded
6
11
0-15
5
17
16-30
9
13
31-45
7
14
46-60
10
22
61-75
7
23
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (23). Late-goal balance (76-90): -16 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Winterthur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaWinterthur
Average goals in match 3.213.29 3.79
Both teams scored 61%66% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%67% 79%
Clean sheets 13%19% 0%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 84%
Goal after half-time 84%85% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Grasshopper 2 - 1 - 0 Winterthur. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FC Winterthur
0 : 2
Grasshopper Club Zürich
FC Winterthur
0 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich
Grasshopper Club Zürich
2 : 2
FC Winterthur

FAQ

What was the result of Grasshopper vs Winterthur?

The Super League match finished Grasshopper 3:2 Winterthur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grasshopper and Winterthur?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Grasshopper won 2, Winterthur won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Winterthur?

Grasshopper score 1.26 goals per game on average and Winterthur 1.16. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Grasshopper's matches and 68% of Winterthur's.

What form are Grasshopper and Winterthur in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Winterthur 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Winterthur?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Grasshopper vs Winterthur: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.