Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Grasshopper vs Zürich: match statistics

Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Zürich crest
Zürich
145%(2.33)
X30%(3.52)
225%(2.70)

Grasshopper appear to have a slight edge in this match, primarily due to home advantage. The hosts have averaged 1.2 points per game in their last five matches overall and show more consistent form (D-W-D-L-D) compared to Zürich (L-L-L-W-L), who have managed only 0.6 points per game. Zürich have a very poor defense away from home, conceding an average of 1.83 goals per game, and have never kept a clean sheet in away matches this season. Grasshopper have scored an average of 1.5 goals in home matches, which, combined with an expected xG of 1.44, suggests efficiency in finishing. Zürich win only 25% of their away matches and lose as many as half, further favoring the hosts. Considering all statistics, a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Grasshopper's high percentage of home draws (42%), but the visitors' poor form points to a slight advantage for the home side.

Grasshopper vs Zürich: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grasshopper play Zürich in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 21 February 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Grasshopper: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Zürich: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grasshopper scores 1.26 and concedes 1.95 goals per match. Zürich scores 1.29 and concedes 1.89. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grasshopper 61%, Zürich 66%. Over 2.5: Grasshopper 58%, Zürich 76%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Zürich has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.41. Grasshopper: 12.5 shots per match, Zürich: 12.9.

Match halves

Grasshopper: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.66. Zürich: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Grasshopper: 76-90+ (11 goals). Zürich: 61-75 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-0-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Grasshopper appear to have a slight edge in this match, primarily due to home advantage. The hosts have averaged 1.2 points per game in their last five matches overall and show more consistent form (D-W-D-L-D) compared to Zürich (L-L-L-W-L), who have managed only 0.6 points per game. Zürich have a very poor defense away from home, conceding an average of 1.83 goals per game, and have never kept a clean sheet in away matches this season. Grasshopper have scored an average of 1.5 goals in home matches, which, combined with an expected xG of 1.44, suggests efficiency in finishing. Zürich win only 25% of their away matches and lose as many as half, further favoring the hosts. Considering all statistics, a draw is also a realistic scenario due to Grasshopper's high percentage of home draws (42%), but the visitors' poor form points to a slight advantage for the home side.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
GrasshopperZürich
16Shots10
GrasshopperZürich
5Shots on target4
GrasshopperZürich
1.68xG1.23
GrasshopperZürich
10Corners4
GrasshopperZürich
44Dangerous attacks42
GrasshopperZürich
13Fouls9
GrasshopperZürich
2Cards3
GrasshopperZürich

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.26Goals scored / match1.29
GrasshopperZürich
1.95Goals conceded / match1.89
GrasshopperZürich
45%Average possession50%
GrasshopperZürich
4.34Shots on target / match4.66
GrasshopperZürich

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.5Shots per match12.92
GrasshopperZürich
4.34Shots on target4.66
GrasshopperZürich
10.1%Shot conversion10%
GrasshopperZürich
45%Possession50%
GrasshopperZürich
1.41xG for1.48
GrasshopperZürich
1.62xG against1.7
GrasshopperZürich

Shooting quality

Grasshopper: BalancedZürich: Balanced
GrasshopperZürich
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grasshopper is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Grasshopper · 0.8 pts / match - Zürich

Grasshopper
LLLWW
Season result split
21% W24% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-21
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-10
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Zürich
LDWLL
Season result split
29% W13% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-22
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-11
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Zürich keeps a clean sheet in 5% (2 of 38 matches).

Zürich scoring profile: very strong

Zürich scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

48Goals scored (season)49
GrasshopperZürich
74Goals conceded (season)72
GrasshopperZürich
3.21Average goals in match3.18
GrasshopperZürich
8Goals scored (last 5)4
GrasshopperZürich
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
GrasshopperZürich

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
GrasshopperZürich
29%2 goals45%
GrasshopperZürich
18%3 goals13%
GrasshopperZürich
3%4 goals0%
GrasshopperZürich

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal95%
GrasshopperZürich
53%2 goals58%
GrasshopperZürich
26%3 goals26%
GrasshopperZürich
16%4 goals11%
GrasshopperZürich

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time26%
GrasshopperZürich
11%BTTS in both halves5%
GrasshopperZürich
24%Scored in both halves21%
GrasshopperZürich

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS61%
GrasshopperZürich
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
GrasshopperZürich
80%BTTS - last 540%
GrasshopperZürich

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
GrasshopperZürich
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
GrasshopperZürich
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
GrasshopperZürich

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
GrasshopperZürich
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
GrasshopperZürich
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
GrasshopperZürich

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Grasshopper · 1.08 pts / match - Zürich

Grasshopper - half-time state
29% leading34% draw37% trailing
Zürich - half-time state
24% leading37% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.08
GrasshopperZürich
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.61
GrasshopperZürich
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
GrasshopperZürich
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.42
GrasshopperZürich
45%Clean sheet before half-time37%
GrasshopperZürich
55%No goal before half-time55%
GrasshopperZürich

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)0.97
GrasshopperZürich
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
GrasshopperZürich
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
GrasshopperZürich
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.76
GrasshopperZürich
29%Clean sheet after half-time32%
GrasshopperZürich
50%No goal after half-time53%
GrasshopperZürich

Grasshopper - second-half results

18% W34% R47% P
46
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zürich - second-half results

24% W26% R50% P
41
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Zürich - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
9
11
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
11
31-45
5
13
46-60
9
19
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Zürich
ScoredConceded
5
11
0-15
9
7
16-30
9
13
31-45
6
7
46-60
12
9
61-75
8
25
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (25). Late-goal balance (76-90): -17 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
129%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Zürich

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

GrasshopperLigaZürich
Average goals in match 3.213.29 3.18
Both teams scored 61%66% 66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%67% 76%
Clean sheets 13%19% 5%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 82%
Goal after half-time 84%85% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Grasshopper 1 - 0 - 2 Zürich. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Grasshopper vs Zürich?

The Super League match finished Grasshopper 1:2 Zürich. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Grasshopper and Zürich?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Grasshopper won 1, Zürich won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Grasshopper vs Zürich?

Grasshopper score 1.26 goals per game on average and Zürich 1.29. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Grasshopper's matches and 66% of Zürich's.

What form are Grasshopper and Zürich in?

Over the last 5 games Grasshopper have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Zürich 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grasshopper vs Zürich?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Grasshopper vs Zürich: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.