Zürich vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Zürich play Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 29 November 2025 at 18:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Zürich: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Grasshopper: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Zürich scores 1.29 and concedes 1.89 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.26 and concedes 1.95. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Zürich 66%, Grasshopper 61%. Over 2.5: Zürich 76%, Grasshopper 58%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Zürich has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.41. Zürich: 12.9 shots per match, Grasshopper: 12.5.

Match halves

Zürich: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.68. Grasshopper: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.66.

Goals by minute

Zürich: 61-75 (12 goals). Grasshopper: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
ZürichGrasshopper
16Shots7
ZürichGrasshopper
6Shots on target2
ZürichGrasshopper
1.8xG1.08
ZürichGrasshopper
9Corners3
ZürichGrasshopper
51Dangerous attacks68
ZürichGrasshopper
10Fouls19
ZürichGrasshopper
7Cards3
ZürichGrasshopper

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.29Goals scored / match1.26
ZürichGrasshopper
1.89Goals conceded / match1.95
ZürichGrasshopper
50%Average possession45%
ZürichGrasshopper
4.66Shots on target / match4.34
ZürichGrasshopper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.92Shots per match12.5
ZürichGrasshopper
4.66Shots on target4.34
ZürichGrasshopper
10%Shot conversion10.1%
ZürichGrasshopper
50%Possession45%
ZürichGrasshopper
1.48xG for1.41
ZürichGrasshopper
1.7xG against1.62
ZürichGrasshopper

Shooting quality

Zürich: BalancedGrasshopper: Balanced
ZürichGrasshopper
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grasshopper is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Zürich · 1.2 pts / match - Grasshopper

Zürich
LDWLL
Season result split
29% W13% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-22
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-11
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Grasshopper
LLLWW
Season result split
21% W24% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-21
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-11
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zürich scoring profile: very strong

Zürich scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Zürich keeps a clean sheet in 5% (2 of 38 matches).

49Goals scored (season)48
ZürichGrasshopper
72Goals conceded (season)74
ZürichGrasshopper
3.18Average goals in match3.21
ZürichGrasshopper
4Goals scored (last 5)8
ZürichGrasshopper
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
ZürichGrasshopper

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
ZürichGrasshopper
45%2 goals29%
ZürichGrasshopper
13%3 goals18%
ZürichGrasshopper
0%4 goals3%
ZürichGrasshopper

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal87%
ZürichGrasshopper
58%2 goals53%
ZürichGrasshopper
26%3 goals26%
ZürichGrasshopper
11%4 goals16%
ZürichGrasshopper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time21%
ZürichGrasshopper
5%BTTS in both halves11%
ZürichGrasshopper
21%Scored in both halves24%
ZürichGrasshopper

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
ZürichGrasshopper
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
ZürichGrasshopper
40%BTTS - last 580%
ZürichGrasshopper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
ZürichGrasshopper
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
ZürichGrasshopper
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
ZürichGrasshopper

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
ZürichGrasshopper
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
ZürichGrasshopper
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
ZürichGrasshopper

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Zürich · 1.21 pts / match - Grasshopper

Zürich - half-time state
24% leading37% draw39% trailing
Grasshopper - half-time state
29% leading34% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)1.21
ZürichGrasshopper
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.61
ZürichGrasshopper
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
ZürichGrasshopper
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.47
ZürichGrasshopper
37%Clean sheet before half-time45%
ZürichGrasshopper
55%No goal before half-time55%
ZürichGrasshopper

After half-time (2nd half)

0.97Points per match (2nd half)0.89
ZürichGrasshopper
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
ZürichGrasshopper
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
ZürichGrasshopper
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.74
ZürichGrasshopper
32%Clean sheet after half-time29%
ZürichGrasshopper
53%No goal after half-time50%
ZürichGrasshopper

Zürich - second-half results

24% W26% R50% P
41
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - second-half results

18% W34% R47% P
46
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zürich - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Zürich
ScoredConceded
5
11
0-15
9
7
16-30
9
13
31-45
6
7
46-60
12
9
61-75
8
25
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (25). Late-goal balance (76-90): -17 - late phases are a weakness.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
9
11
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
11
31-45
5
13
46-60
9
19
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Zürich

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

ZürichLigaGrasshopper
Average goals in match 3.183.29 3.21
Both teams scored 66%66% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 76%67% 58%
Clean sheets 5%19% 13%
Goal before half-time 82%76% 79%
Goal after half-time 87%85% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Zürich 2 - 0 - 1 Grasshopper. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Zürich vs Grasshopper?

The Super League match finished Zürich 1:0 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Zürich and Grasshopper?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Zürich won 2, Grasshopper won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Zürich vs Grasshopper?

Zürich score 1.29 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.26. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 66% of Zürich's matches and 61% of Grasshopper's.

What form are Zürich and Grasshopper in?

Over the last 5 games Zürich have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Grasshopper 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Zürich vs Grasshopper?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Zürich vs Grasshopper: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.