Grazer AK vs LASK Linz: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Grazer AK play LASK Linz in Bundesliga (Austria). The match date is 13 December 2025 at 17:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Grazer AK: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. LASK Linz: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Grazer AK scores 1.31 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. LASK Linz scores 1.75 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Grazer AK 59%, LASK Linz 59%. Over 2.5: Grazer AK 59%, LASK Linz 59%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

LASK Linz has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.13. Grazer AK: 10.1 shots per match, LASK Linz: 15.6.

Match halves

Grazer AK: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78. LASK Linz: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.97.

Goals by minute

Grazer AK: 76-90+ (11 goals). LASK Linz: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Bundesliga: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Grazer AKLASK Linz
13Shots16
Grazer AKLASK Linz
3Shots on target7
Grazer AKLASK Linz
1.22xG1.84
Grazer AKLASK Linz
8Corners7
Grazer AKLASK Linz
26Dangerous attacks47
Grazer AKLASK Linz
10Fouls15
Grazer AKLASK Linz
1Cards0
Grazer AKLASK Linz

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Grazer AKLASK Linz
1.31Goals scored / match1.75
Grazer AKLASK Linz
1.41Goals conceded / match1.31
Grazer AKLASK Linz
48%Average possession49%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
3.5Shots on target / match4.97
Grazer AKLASK Linz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.06Shots per match15.59
Grazer AKLASK Linz
3.5Shots on target4.97
Grazer AKLASK Linz
13%Shot conversion11.2%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
48%Possession49%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
1.13xG for1.69
Grazer AKLASK Linz
1.36xG against1.36
Grazer AKLASK Linz

Shooting quality

Grazer AK: Efficient finishingLASK Linz: Attacking
Grazer AKLASK Linz
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

LASK Linz is 86% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Grazer AK · 2.6 pts / match - LASK Linz

Grazer AK
LLWDW
Season result split
28% W31% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-13
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-3
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
LASK Linz
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
53% W22% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-7-8
1.81 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

LASK Linz is 34% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - Grazer AK · 1.75 goals / match - LASK Linz

LASK Linz is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.41 goals / match - Grazer AK · 1.31 goals / match - LASK Linz

Grazer AK scoring profile: strong

Grazer AK scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while LASK Linz keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).

LASK Linz scoring profile: very strong

LASK Linz scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while Grazer AK keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 32 matches).

42Goals scored (season)56
Grazer AKLASK Linz
45Goals conceded (season)42
Grazer AKLASK Linz
2.72Average goals in match3.06
Grazer AKLASK Linz
10Goals scored (last 5)14
Grazer AKLASK Linz
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Grazer AKLASK Linz

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal84%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
38%2 goals53%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
16%3 goals28%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
6%4 goals6%
Grazer AKLASK Linz

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal72%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
38%2 goals31%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
13%3 goals19%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
3%4 goals6%
Grazer AKLASK Linz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time28%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
28%Scored in both halves31%
Grazer AKLASK Linz

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
40%BTTS - last 580%
Grazer AKLASK Linz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Grazer AKLASK Linz

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Grazer AKLASK Linz

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

LASK Linz is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Grazer AK · 1.31 pts / match - LASK Linz

Grazer AK - half-time state
22% leading44% draw34% trailing
LASK Linz - half-time state
34% leading28% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.31
Grazer AKLASK Linz
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.78
Grazer AKLASK Linz
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
Grazer AKLASK Linz
1.22Average goals (1st half)1.59
Grazer AKLASK Linz
44%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
56%No goal before half-time47%
Grazer AKLASK Linz

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Grazer AKLASK Linz
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.97
Grazer AKLASK Linz
0.72Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Grazer AKLASK Linz
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.47
Grazer AKLASK Linz
44%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Grazer AKLASK Linz
47%No goal after half-time38%
Grazer AKLASK Linz

Grazer AK - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
35
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

LASK Linz - second-half results

47% W34% R19% P
42
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grazer AK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.40
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
LASK Linz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+4+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Grazer AK
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
8
7
16-30
6
11
31-45
8
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
11
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

LASK Linz
ScoredConceded
8
11
0-15
8
6
16-30
9
9
31-45
8
3
46-60
9
4
61-75
14
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.89
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Grazer AK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

LASK Linz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

Grazer AKLigaLASK Linz
Average goals in match 2.722.70 3.06
Both teams scored 59%55% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%51% 59%
Clean sheets 16%25% 28%
Goal before half-time 75%74% 81%
Goal after half-time 81%78% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Grazer AK 0 - 0 - 1 LASK Linz. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

LASK Linz
1 : 0
Liebherr Grazer AK

FAQ

What was the result of Grazer AK vs LASK Linz?

The Bundesliga match finished Grazer AK 1:2 LASK Linz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Grazer AK vs LASK Linz?

Grazer AK score 1.31 goals per game on average and LASK Linz 1.75. The Bundesliga average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Grazer AK's matches and 59% of LASK Linz's.

What form are Grazer AK and LASK Linz in?

Over the last 5 games Grazer AK have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and LASK Linz 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grazer AK vs LASK Linz?

The statistical background for Grazer AK vs LASK Linz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.