Grenoble Foot 38 vs Montpellier: match statistics
Grenoble Foot 38 vs Montpellier: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Grenoble Foot 38 played against Montpellier in Ligue 2 (France). The game was played on December 13, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Grenoble Foot 38 has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Montpellier has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Grenoble Foot 38 scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.25. Montpellier scores 1.06 and allows 0.94. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Grenoble Foot 38's games and 38% of Montpellier's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 19%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Montpellier has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.24 per game. Grenoble Foot 38 takes 10.7 shots per game, while Montpellier takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Grenoble Foot 38 leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. Montpellier leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
Grenoble Foot 38's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Montpellier, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligue 2 games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Grenoble Foot 38 | Montpellier | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Grenoble Foot 38 is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Grenoble Foot 38 · 1.4 pts / game - Montpellier
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Grenoble Foot 38 is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
1.13 goals / game - Grenoble Foot 38 · 1.06 goals / game - Montpellier
Montpellier is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Grenoble Foot 38 · 0.94 goals / game - Montpellier
Grenoble Foot 38 scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Montpellier keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).
Montpellier scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while Grenoble Foot 38 keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Grenoble Foot 38
Over / Under - Montpellier
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grenoble Foot 38 is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Grenoble Foot 38 · 0.81 pts / game - Montpellier
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Grenoble Foot 38 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Montpellier - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Grenoble Foot 38
Montpellier
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).
Teams vs league
| Grenoble Foot 38 | Liga | Montpellier | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.38 | 2.52 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 51% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 47% | ▼ 19% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 28% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 68% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 74% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Grenoble Foot 38 vs Montpellier?
The Ligue 2 match finished Grenoble Foot 38 1:1 Montpellier. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Grenoble Foot 38 vs Montpellier?
Grenoble Foot 38 score 1.13 goals per game on average and Montpellier 1.06. The Ligue 2 average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Grenoble Foot 38's matches and 38% of Montpellier's.
What form are Grenoble Foot 38 and Montpellier in?
Over the last 5 games Grenoble Foot 38 have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Montpellier 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Grenoble Foot 38 vs Montpellier?
The statistical background for Grenoble Foot 38 vs Montpellier — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.