Gwangju vs Anyang: match statistics
Gwangju vs Anyang: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gwangju played against Anyang in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Gwangju World Cup Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Gwangju has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Anyang has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Gwangju scores 0.64 goals per game and allows 2.14. Anyang scores 1.25 and allows 1.61. Games in this league average 2.46 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Gwangju's games and 71% of Anyang's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Anyang has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.13 per game. Gwangju takes 8.9 shots per game, while Anyang takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Gwangju leads at halftime in 4% of its games and scores 0.39 goals per game after halftime. Anyang leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gwangju's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Anyang, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.46 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Anyang have a clearly better season record: they have won 8 matches and scored 33 goals, while Gwangju have recorded just 1 victory and scored 18 goals. Away from home, the visitors average 1.38 goals per match, compared with just 0.79 for the hosts at home, while Gwangju fail to score in as many as 50% of their home games, compared with 15% for Anyang away. The hosts’ defense also looks vulnerable, conceding an average of 2.07 goals at home and allowing opponents an xG of 1.99, whereas Anyang concede 1.23 goals away from home. The visitors also create more high-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.36 compared with Gwangju’s 1.19, and register more shots on target: 4.38 versus 3.43 per match. Although Anyang have conceded 13 goals in their last 5 matches, their away defeat rate is only 23%, compared with Gwangju’s 64% loss rate at home, which supports an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a high seasonal rate of matches featuring goals from both sides: Gwangju 71% and Anyang 69%, clearly above the league average of 51%. Gwangju have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 1.86 goals, while Anyang score an average of 1.38 goals per match. Recent form also supports a goal exchange, as both teams recorded BTTS at 60% in their last five matches, while their defenses allowed opponents an average of 2.0 and 2.6 goals per game, respectively. Anyang do have a 23% clean-sheet rate, but Gwangju have averaged 1.4 goals in their last five matches, while the visitors’ defense allowed an average of 1.52 xG. A Goal/Goal scenario is therefore more likely than BTTS No, in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to goals, but not an exceptionally high total: Gwangju score an average of 1.07 goals, while Anyang average 1.38, with the league-wide average standing at 2.44. However, both defenses are vulnerable, as Gwangju concede an average of 1.86 goals, while Anyang have conceded as many as 2.60 per game across their last five matches. The attacking potential is not high enough to strongly support a four-goal total: the average xG over the last five matches is only 1.07 for the home side and 1.06 for the visitors. Historically, under 3.5 goals has landed in 79% of Gwangju’s matches and 77% of Anyang’s, giving Under 3.5 the clearest edge despite the increased risk of a 2:2 scoreline.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point, as Gwangju were level at the break in 50% of their matches, while Anyang did so in as many as 69%. Both teams usually approach the first half cautiously: the hosts score an average of 0.43 goals before the break, while the visitors concede just 0.31, with both sides scoring in the first half in only 14% and 23% of matches, respectively. After the interval, the advantage should shift towards Anyang, who average 1.38 goals per game this season compared with Gwangju’s 1.07 and register 4.38 shots on target per match against the hosts’ 2.86. Gwangju also have a clear defensive problem, conceding an average of 1.86 goals per match, including 1.07 in second halves, which is why the HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by an Anyang win at the final whistle has the strongest foundations.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gwangju | Anyang | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Anyang is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Gwangju · 0.8 pts / game - Anyang
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Anyang is 95% better for: goals scored per game.
0.64 goals / game - Gwangju · 1.25 goals / game - Anyang
Anyang is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.14 goals / game - Gwangju · 1.61 goals / game - Anyang
Gwangju scores in 43% of games (12 of 28 meczów), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 meczów).
Anyang scores in 79% of games (22 of 28 meczów), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gwangju
Over / Under - Anyang
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Anyang is 106% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.64 pts / game - Gwangju · 1.32 pts / game - Anyang
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gwangju - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 4% of games and wins 4%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Anyang - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gwangju
Anyang
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Gwangju | Liga | Anyang | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.79 | 2.46 | ▲ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 52% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 30% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 60% | • 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Gwangju's perspective: 3 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Anyang. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gwangju vs Anyang?
The K League 1 match finished Gwangju 1:1 Anyang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gwangju and Anyang?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Gwangju won 3, Anyang won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gwangju vs Anyang?
Gwangju score 0.64 goals per game on average and Anyang 1.25. The K League 1 average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Gwangju's matches and 71% of Anyang's.
What form are Gwangju and Anyang in?
Over the last 5 games Gwangju have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Anyang 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gwangju vs Anyang?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Gwangju vs Anyang: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.