Gyeongnam vs Seongnam: match statistics
Gyeongnam vs Seongnam: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Gyeongnam played against Seongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Changwon Football Center. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Gyeongnam has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Seongnam has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Gyeongnam scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 1.30. Seongnam scores 1.13 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.68 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Gyeongnam's games and 65% of Seongnam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 43%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Seongnam has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.37 per game. Gyeongnam takes 11.6 shots per game, while Seongnam takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Gyeongnam leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.78 goals per game after halftime. Seongnam leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
Gyeongnam's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Seongnam, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.68 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Gyeongnam has a clearly better home record: they win 50% of their home matches, while Seongnam win only 33% of their away games and lose 42%. The hosts average 1.67 goals per home match, compared with Seongnam’s 1.25 away goals, and are also more efficient at converting shots into goals — 13% versus 10% for the visitors. Both teams create chances of a similar quality, with average xG of 1.43 for Gyeongnam and 1.44 for Seongnam, but the hosts’ defense allows a lower opponent xG: 1.25 compared with 1.37. Seongnam are in slightly better current form, scoring 6 goals and collecting 8 points in their last five matches, while Gyeongnam have scored 4 times and earned 6 points. Despite this, home advantage, better season-long efficiency and the visitors’ weaker defense, which keeps a clean sheet in only 8% of away matches, provide a slight edge to Gyeongnam.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is clear, as BTTS occurred in 55% of Gyeongnam’s matches and as many as 75% of Seongnam’s, compared with the league average of 62%. The trend is even stronger across the last five outings, in which both teams scored in 60% and 80% of matches, respectively. Seongnam have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of matches and concede an average of 1.42 goals, which supports the likelihood of the hosts scoring despite their modest average of 1.0 goal per game. The visitors average 1.25 goals, while Gyeongnam have allowed opponents an xG of 1.80 over their last five matches, well above their season average of 1.36. Although Gyeongnam have shown solid defensive form, conceding an average of 0.91 goals, the combination of Seongnam’s high BTTS frequency and the visitors’ poor clean-sheet record points towards a BTTS - Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Gyeongnam score an average of 1.00 goals at home and concede just 0.91, while Seongnam score 1.25 goals away but allow opponents 1.42. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored just 8 goals in total, averaging 1.60 per game, and none of those matches produced more than 2 goals. Seongnam have greater potential for an open game, as 58% of their matches went Over 2.5 goals, but only 25% went Over 3.5, while Gyeongnam’s Over 3.5 rate stands at just 18%. Both teams produce around 3.8 shots on target per game, and the projected total of 2.35 goals points more towards a scoreline of 1:1, 2:0 or 2:1 than a game featuring at least four goals. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals is best supported by the hosts’ low number of high-scoring matches and the moderate attacking efficiency of both teams.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as Gyeongnam drew as many as 55% of their matches this season and shared the points in 60% of their last five games. The first half should be cautious: the hosts concede an average of just 0.27 goals before the break, and in their last five matches they went into half-time level on 100% of occasions. Seongnam also has a profile conducive to an evenly balanced opening, having been level at half-time in 42% of their matches and keeping a clean sheet before the break in 80% of their last five outings. After the interval, both teams are more likely to concede, but Gyeongnam finished the second half level in as many as 82% of matches, limiting the visitors’ advantage despite their stronger recent form. Seongnam averages 1.25 goals per match but concedes 1.42 away from home, so following an evenly contested first half, the most logical outcome remains a share of the points.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Gyeongnam | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Seongnam is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 2 pts / game - Seongnam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Gyeongnam is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
1.3 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 1.13 goals / game - Seongnam
Seongnam is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.3 goals / game - Gyeongnam · 1.17 goals / game - Seongnam
Gyeongnam scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 meczów).
Seongnam scores in 70% of games (16 of 23 meczów), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Gyeongnam
Over / Under - Seongnam
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seongnam is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / game - Gyeongnam · 1.52 pts / game - Seongnam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Gyeongnam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 30%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Gyeongnam
Seongnam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Gyeongnam | Liga | Seongnam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.61 | 2.68 | ▼ 2.30 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 52% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 23% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 68% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 77% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Gyeongnam's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses against Seongnam. Games average 1.75 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Gyeongnam vs Seongnam?
The K League 2 match finished Gyeongnam 1:0 Seongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Gyeongnam and Seongnam?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Gyeongnam won 0, Seongnam won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Gyeongnam vs Seongnam?
Gyeongnam score 1.30 goals per game on average and Seongnam 1.13. The K League 2 average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Gyeongnam's matches and 65% of Seongnam's.
What form are Gyeongnam and Seongnam in?
Over the last 5 games Gyeongnam have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Seongnam 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Gyeongnam vs Seongnam?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


