Haka vs EIF: match statistics
Haka vs EIF: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Haka played against EIF in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 11, 2026. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Haka has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. EIF has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Haka scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 1.08. EIF scores 1.54 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.44 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 46% of Haka's games and 54% of EIF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 69%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Haka has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.33 per game. Haka takes 11.9 shots per game, while EIF takes 10.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Haka leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 1.15 goals per game after halftime. EIF leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.92 after halftime.
When the teams score
Haka's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For EIF, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.44 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 7.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Haka to win because the hosts average 2.14 goals per home match versus EIF’s 1.17 on the road. EIF concedes 3.00 goals per away match, while Haka concedes only 1.57 at home; in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded 10 goals compared to Haka’s 6. Haka also posts a higher home xG (1.67 vs 1.28 xG for the visitors away), more shots on target (5.14 vs 3.0) and a superior shot conversion rate (16% vs 12%). Additionally, Haka have a positive home record (goal difference +4, win rate 43%), whereas EIF have a negative away goal difference (-11) and 0% wins on the road. Considering Haka’s offensive edge, EIF’s poor away defense and the last 5 matches form (points 1.2 vs 0.8), I assign a higher probability to the hosts than to a draw or an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'BTTS - Yes' scenario is more likely, as EIF away have 0% clean sheets and concede on average 3.0 goals per match, with BTTS occurring in 67% of their away fixtures. Haka at home score on average 1.86 goals (21 this season) and have an xG of 1.37 while allowing an xG against of 1.42, indicating the hosts create chances but also concede opportunities. In the last 5 matches Haka have scored 6 and conceded 6 (avg 1.2/1.2), while EIF have scored 3 and conceded 10 (0.6/2.0), so the visitors regularly concede goals and can occasionally reply. Additionally both teams have a high share of matches over 2.5 goals (Haka 71% and EIF 67%), so a BTTS forecast rated at around 72% is justified.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of about 2.82 goals: Haka 1.47 and EIF 1.35, calculated as the average of attacking xG and the opponent’s defensive xG ((1.37+1.56)/2 = 1.47 and (1.28+1.42)/2 = 1.35). Season-long figures support this: Haka scores 1.86 goals at home on average, while EIF concedes 3.0 away; the league averages 2.38 goals per match. Haka has 71% of home matches over 1.5 and 71% over 2.5, while EIF records 83% over 1.5 and 67% over 2.5 on the road, which increases the probability of Over 1.5/2.5. Haka averages 4.57 shots on target with 18% conversion, and EIF 3.0 SoT with 12% conversion, further raising the realistic chance of goals. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (I rate 92%), Over 2.5 looks solid (72%), and Over 3.5 is less likely (30%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Haka has a clear statistical advantage: the hosts average 1.86 goals per match versus EIF’s 1.17, win 71% of home games and collect 2.14 points per match, while EIF have 0% away wins and just 0.17 PPG. At half-time Haka led in 3 of 7 home matches (43%) and average 0.71 goals scored by the break with only 0.14 conceded, whereas EIF average 0.5 scored and 1.67 conceded by half-time and were trailing at the break in 6 of 6 away games (100%). Haka’s edge is supported by xG and chance metrics: home xG 1.37 versus EIF 1.28, shots on target 4.57 vs 3.0 and finishing rate 18% vs 12%, and in the 31–45' phase Haka scored 3 goals while EIF conceded 6 in that phase. Therefore the model favors the scenario of Haka leading at half-time and winning full-time (1/1) as the strongest signal (37%), with the overall probability of Haka leading at the break being 43%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Haka | EIF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Haka is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Haka · 0.8 pts / game - EIF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haka is 5% better for: goals scored per game.
1.62 goals / game - Haka · 1.54 goals / game - EIF
Haka is 85% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.08 goals / game - Haka · 2 goals / game - EIF
Haka scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).
EIF scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haka
Over / Under - EIF
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haka is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / game - Haka · 1 pts / game - EIF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
EIF - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Haka
EIF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| Haka | Liga | EIF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.69 | 2.44 | ▲ 3.54 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 46% | 42% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 46% | 44% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 33% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 64% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 77% | 73% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Haka's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against EIF. Games average 7.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Haka vs EIF?
The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 3:1 EIF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs EIF?
Haka score 1.62 goals per game on average and EIF 1.54. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Haka's matches and 54% of EIF's.
What form are Haka and EIF in?
Over the last 5 games Haka have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and EIF 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs EIF?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haka vs EIF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.