Finland - YkkösliigaTehtaan kenttäData current as of September 06, 2026

Haka vs KTP: match statistics

Haka crest
Haka
0 : 2half-time 0:1
KTP crest
KTP

Haka vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Haka played against KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Venue: Tehtaan kenttä. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Haka has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. KTP has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Haka scores 1.82 goals per game and allows 0.91. KTP scores 1.45 and allows 0.91. Games in this league average 2.30 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 45% of Haka's games and 36% of KTP's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 36%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.85 to 1.55 per game. Haka takes 12.1 shots per game, while KTP takes 16.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Haka leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 1.27 goals per game after halftime. KTP leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.91 after halftime.

When the teams score

Haka's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For KTP, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.30 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a Haka win (1) — hosts demonstrate clear home efficiency: on average 2.50 goals per match, 5.67 shots on target and a 19% conversion rate, with 0% of matches without scoring. KTP arrives in excellent form (4 wins in last 5, 2.4 points per match in that period) and shows impressive away defense: on average only 1.0 goals conceded and 67% clean sheets. However, xG indicates a balanced contest: Haka home xG 1.70 versus KTP away xG 1.78, and xG against 1.21 vs 1.16, suggesting similar quality of chances created. The hosts’ key advantage is higher efficiency (actual 2.50 goals vs xG 1.70) and a greater share of shots on target, while the visitors counter with consistency and away clean sheets, hence the forecast is cautiously in favor of Haka.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have relatively low season BTTS rates: Haka 40% and KTP 33%, versus a league BTTS average of 38%, indicating matches in this league less often finish Goal/Goal. A strong signal against BTTS is the high incidence of clean sheets — KTP away has 67% clean sheets, and league-wide 71% of matches end with a clean sheet for one side. Haka at home scores 1.8 goals on average with xG 1.93 and 6.2 shots on target, while conceding only 0.8 goals per game; KTP posts xG 1.78 and 4.33 shots on target per game, making them offensively slightly weaker than the hosts. In the last 5 matches KTP scored 9 goals (1.8 per game) with last5 xG 1.99, and Haka in the same period scored 7 and conceded 7 with last5 xG against of 1.53, which introduces some risk of an away goal but does not negate the defensive signal. Considering the low seasonal BTTS (40% and 33%), high clean sheet percentages (67% for the away side and 71% league-wide) and moderate xG for both teams, No Goal is more likely — I recommend a 70% 'No' / 30% 'Yes' split.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The forecast based on xG and seasonal averages gives 1.55 expected goals for Haka (xG Haka 1.93 vs xG against KTP 1.16) and 1.43 for KTP (xG KTP 1.78 vs xG against Haka 1.07), totalling 2.98 expected goals. With a total expected score of 2.98 the Poisson model indicates roughly an 80% probability of more than 1.5 goals and about a 57% probability of Over 2.5 goals, which favors the Over 1.5 bet. Additionally, Haka scores on average 1.8 goals per match and has 100% of games with at least one goal, while KTP has scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches and has an average xG of 1.99, reinforcing the expectation of goals from both sides. Counterarguments are significant: KTP has 67% clean sheets this season, and the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is only 40% for Haka and 33% for KTP, so very high totals are less likely (I estimate Over 3.5 at around 35%). As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation: Over at the 1.5 line) with expected goals of 1.55 for Haka and 1.43 for KTP.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Haka is stronger in attack at home: they average 1.8 goals per match versus KTP's 1.17 and have higher xG (1.93 vs 1.78), more shots on target (6.2 vs 4.33) and better conversion rate (11% vs 7%). At Half-Time a draw is most common – Haka led at the break in 40% of matches, KTP only in 17%, while KTP were level at the break in 67% of games with an average HT goals around 1.0 (0.6 vs 0.5). After the break the hosts more frequently decide matches in their favor: Haka score on average 1.2 goals in the second half and have goals after the break in 80% of matches, compared to 0.67 goals and 67% for KTP. Considering Haka’s 80% home win rate and HTPPG of 1.6 versus KTP’s 1.17, the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Haka win at Full-Time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

65Possession (%)35
HakaKTP
10Shots9
HakaKTP
2Shots on target4
HakaKTP
1.46xG1.07
HakaKTP
4Corners4
HakaKTP
95Dangerous attacks30
HakaKTP
18Fouls7
HakaKTP
2Cards1
HakaKTP

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.82Goals scored / game1.45
HakaKTP
0.91Goals allowed / game0.91
HakaKTP
57%Average possession51%
HakaKTP
5Shots on target / game5.18
HakaKTP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.09Shots per game16.27
HakaKTP
5Shots on target5.18
HakaKTP
15%Shot conversion8.9%
HakaKTP
57%Possession51%
HakaKTP
1.55xG for1.85
HakaKTP
1.15xG against1.12
HakaKTP

Shooting quality

Haka: Efficient finishingKTP: Attacking
HakaKTP
Accuracy (shots on target)41%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Haka
WWLWW
Season result split
55% W27% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-2
1.91 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
KTP
WWWLW
Season result split
73% W9% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-2
2.27 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-1
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.82 goals / game - Haka · 1.45 goals / game - KTP

Haka scoring profile: strong

Haka scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 meczów), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 55% (6 of 11 meczów).

KTP scoring profile: strong

KTP scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 meczów), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 meczów).

20Goals scored (season)16
HakaKTP
10Goals conceded (season)10
HakaKTP
2.73Average goals per game2.36
HakaKTP
8Goals scored (last 5)9
HakaKTP
3Goals conceded (last 5)4
HakaKTP

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal82%
HakaKTP
55%2 goals36%
HakaKTP
18%3 goals9%
HakaKTP
18%4 goals9%
HakaKTP

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal45%
HakaKTP
27%2 goals18%
HakaKTP
9%3 goals9%
HakaKTP
0%4 goals9%
HakaKTP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time27%
HakaKTP
9%BTTS in both halves9%
HakaKTP
36%Scored in both halves27%
HakaKTP

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
HakaKTP
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HakaKTP
40%BTTS - last 540%
HakaKTP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
HakaKTP
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
HakaKTP
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
HakaKTP

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
HakaKTP
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
HakaKTP
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
HakaKTP

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haka - half-time state
36% leading27% draw36% trailing
KTP - half-time state
27% leading55% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per game (1st half)1.36
HakaKTP
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.55
HakaKTP
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
HakaKTP
1.09Average goals (1st half)1
HakaKTP
55%Clean sheet before half-time64%
HakaKTP
55%No goal before half-time55%
HakaKTP

After half-time (2nd half)

2.09Points per game (2nd half)1.91
HakaKTP
1.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
HakaKTP
0.36Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
HakaKTP
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.36
HakaKTP
73%Clean sheet after half-time73%
HakaKTP
27%No goal after half-time36%
HakaKTP

Haka - second-half results

55% W45% R0% P
15
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KTP - second-half results

55% W27% R18% P
15
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding270%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Haka - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.60
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
KTP - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.60
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.61.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Haka
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
3
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
5
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

KTP
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
4
31-45
3
3
46-60
4
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

HakaLigaKTP
Average goals per game 2.732.30 2.36
Both teams scored 45%39% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%40% 36%
Clean sheets 45%35% 55%
Goal before half-time 73%61% 55%
Goal after half-time 73%68% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.30
Average goals per game
39%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / game
1.04
Away goals / game
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HakaYellow cardJesper Karlsson
  2. HakaSubstitutionOn: Kevin NurmiOff: Aaron Keto-Diyawa
  3. KTPYellow cardJoni Mäkelä
  4. HakaSubstitutionOn: Thomas LahdensuoOff: Oliver Whyte
  5. HakaSubstitutionOn: Miika MahlamäkiOff: Imani Lanquedoc
  6. HakaYellow cardOiva Laaksonen
  7. HakaSubstitutionOn: Nika SitchinavaOff: Niklas Friberg
  8. KTPSubstitutionOn: Otto EloluotoOff: Foday Manneh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Haka's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses against KTP. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

KTP
0 : 2
Haka
Valkeakosken Haka
1 : 2
Kotkan Työväen Palloilijat
Valkeakosken Haka
2 : 3
Kotkan Työväen Palloilijat
Kotkan Työväen Palloilijat
0 : 0
Valkeakosken Haka

FAQ

What was the result of Haka vs KTP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished Haka 0:2 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Haka and KTP?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Haka won 1, KTP won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Haka vs KTP?

Haka score 1.82 goals per game on average and KTP 1.45. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Haka's matches and 36% of KTP's.

What form are Haka and KTP in?

Over the last 5 games Haka have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and KTP 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haka vs KTP?

The statistical background for Haka vs KTP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.