Haras El Hodood vs Pharco: match statistics
Haras El Hodood, despite a weak table position (16th place), performs significantly better in home matches than Pharco does on the road. The hosts have a -3 goal difference at home, while the guests concede an average of 1.57 goals per away match while scoring just 0.57, resulting in a -7 balance. Pharco is in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in the last five meetings, whereas Haras earned 2 points during this period. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.2 vs 0.75), and their shot efficiency (10% vs 9%) and average shots on target (2.71 vs 1.86) are higher. Pharco fails to score in 43% of away matches, which, combined with their current crisis form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all factors, Haras El Hodood has a real chance to end their poor streak and capitalize on home advantage against a team in deep crisis.
Haras El Hodood vs Pharco: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Haras El Hodood played against Pharco in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on February 5, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Haras El Hodood has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Pharco has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Haras El Hodood scores 0.73 goals per game and allows 1.40. Pharco scores 0.33 and allows 1.07. Games in this league average 2.01 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Haras El Hodood's games and 20% of Pharco's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 7%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Haras El Hodood has the higher season xG average, 1.15 to 0.95 per game. Haras El Hodood takes 9.3 shots per game, while Pharco takes 8.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Haras El Hodood leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.27 goals per game after halftime. Pharco leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Haras El Hodood's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Pharco, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 2.01 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haras El Hodood, despite a weak table position (16th place), performs significantly better in home matches than Pharco does on the road. The hosts have a -3 goal difference at home, while the guests concede an average of 1.57 goals per away match while scoring just 0.57, resulting in a -7 balance. Pharco is in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in the last five meetings, whereas Haras earned 2 points during this period. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.2 vs 0.75), and their shot efficiency (10% vs 9%) and average shots on target (2.71 vs 1.86) are higher. Pharco fails to score in 43% of away matches, which, combined with their current crisis form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all factors, Haras El Hodood has a real chance to end their poor streak and capitalize on home advantage against a team in deep crisis.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Haras El Hodood | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.13 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Pharco is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Haras El Hodood · 1.2 pts / game - Pharco
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haras El Hodood is 121% better for: goals scored per game.
0.73 goals / game - Haras El Hodood · 0.33 goals / game - Pharco
Pharco is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.4 goals / game - Haras El Hodood · 1.07 goals / game - Pharco
Haras El Hodood scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 meczów).
Pharco scores in 33% of games (5 of 15 meczów), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haras El Hodood
Over / Under - Pharco
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pharco is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.73 pts / game - Haras El Hodood · 0.93 pts / game - Pharco
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haras El Hodood - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Haras El Hodood
Pharco
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Haras El Hodood | Liga | Pharco | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.13 | 2.01 | ▼ 1.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 40% | 35% | ▼ 7% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 36% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 87% | 57% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 40% | 68% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs Pharco?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 2:2 Pharco. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs Pharco?
Haras El Hodood score 0.73 goals per game on average and Pharco 0.33. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 20% of Pharco's.
What form are Haras El Hodood and Pharco in?
Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Pharco 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs Pharco?
The statistical background for Haras El Hodood vs Pharco — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.