Havadar vs Mes Kerman: match statistics
Havadar vs Mes Kerman: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Havadar play Mes Kerman in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 15 June 2026 at 16:30. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Havadar: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Mes Kerman: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Havadar scores 0.94 and concedes 0.65 goals per match. Mes Kerman scores 0.68 and concedes 0.53. League average: 1.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Havadar 26%, Mes Kerman 26%. Over 2.5: Havadar 21%, Mes Kerman 15%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Mes Kerman has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.91. Havadar: 2.4 shots per match, Mes Kerman: 3.6.
Match halves
Havadar: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.32. Mes Kerman: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.35.
Goals by minute
Havadar: 31-45+ (8 goals). Mes Kerman: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Havadar is the favorite due to a clear superiority in chance creation: home xG averages 1.08 versus Mes Kerman’s 0.49, and average shots 7.67 with 3.44 on target compared to the visitors’ 2.5 and 1.0, indicating greater offensive pressure from the hosts. Defensively both teams are compact — Havadar concedes 0.5 goals per game at home, Mes Kerman concedes 0.43 on the road, and both record clean sheets in 64% of matches, suggesting a low-scoring affair. Form supports the home edge: Havadar’s last five matches show 1 win and 4 draws, 2 goals scored and none conceded (1.4 points per game), whereas Mes Kerman have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, scoring 3 and conceding 3 (1.0 point per game). Havadar’s high share of home draws (57% draws, 29% wins) increases the likelihood of a stalemate, but the advantage in xG and shot volume favors a narrow home victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Havadar | Mes Kerman | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.39 | 0.31 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.03 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Havadar is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Havadar · 1.2 pts / match - Mes Kerman
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Havadar is 38% better for: goals scored per match.
0.94 goals / match - Havadar · 0.68 goals / match - Mes Kerman
Mes Kerman is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.65 goals / match - Havadar · 0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman
Havadar scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 56% (19 of 34 matches).
Mes Kerman scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Havadar keeps a clean sheet in 59% (20 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Havadar
Over / Under — Mes Kerman
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Havadar is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Havadar · 1.24 pts / match - Mes Kerman
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Havadar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Mes Kerman - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Havadar
Mes Kerman
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Havadar | Liga | Mes Kerman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.59 | 1.59 | ▼ 1.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 26% | 30% | ▼ 26% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 21% | 22% | ▼ 15% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 59% | 46% | ▲ 56% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 53% | 46% | ▼ 35% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 47% | 57% | • 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Havadar 0 - 0 - 1 Mes Kerman. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Havadar vs Mes Kerman?
The Azadegan League match finished Havadar 1:1 Mes Kerman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Havadar vs Mes Kerman?
Havadar score 0.94 goals per game on average and Mes Kerman 0.68. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Havadar's matches and 26% of Mes Kerman's.
What form are Havadar and Mes Kerman in?
Over the last 5 games Havadar have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Mes Kerman 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Havadar vs Mes Kerman?
The statistical background for Havadar vs Mes Kerman — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.