Lithuania - A LygaData current as of 23 July 2026

Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: match statistics

Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hegelmann Litauen play Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match date is 6 May 2026 at 17:30. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Hegelmann Litauen: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Panevėžys: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hegelmann Litauen scores 1.00 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Panevėžys scores 0.95 and concedes 1.81. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hegelmann Litauen 67%, Panevėžys 57%. Over 2.5: Hegelmann Litauen 43%, Panevėžys 62%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Panevėžys has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.14. Hegelmann Litauen: 9.6 shots per match, Panevėžys: 11.0.

Match halves

Hegelmann Litauen: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.52. Panevėžys: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Hegelmann Litauen: 61-75 (5 goals). Panevėžys: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 3-2-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 67%.

Match description

I project a draw: the hosts register as many as 67% draws in home matches and average 0.83 goals scored per home game with 0.83 conceded, suggesting low-scoring affairs. The visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 7 goals in that span, but away they concede 2.17 goals per game on average and have an average xG against of 1.91, indicating significant defensive risk. Panevėžys averages 3.33 shots on target per away match versus the hosts' 2.67 SOT at home, and a conversion rate of 9% versus 8% gives the visitors a slight finishing edge. In terms of chance quality, the hosts have home xG for 1.23 and xG against 1.55, while the visitors have xG for 1.06 and xG against 1.91, so both teams create few high-quality chances and the visitors’ defense looks weaker. Considering this, I back a draw; I expect a low-scoring game (0:0 or 1:1).

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
12Shots14
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
7Shots on target5
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.52xG1.52
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
5Corners6
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
39Dangerous attacks41
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
15Fouls11
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
4Cards2
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1Goals scored / match0.95
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.62Goals conceded / match1.81
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
43%Average possession47%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
2.95Shots on target / match3.76
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.62Shots per match11
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
2.95Shots on target3.76
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
10.4%Shot conversion8.7%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
43%Possession47%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.14xG for1.26
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.47xG against1.64
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Shooting quality

Hegelmann Litauen: BalancedPanevėžys: Balanced
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
Accuracy (shots on target)31%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Panevėžys is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 0.8 pts / match - Panevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen
DDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
14% W52% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-11-7
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-8-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 20%
Panevėžys
LWLDL
Season result split
29% W19% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-11
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hegelmann Litauen is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 0.95 goals / match - Panevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - Hegelmann Litauen · 1.81 goals / match - Panevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen scoring profile: very strong

Hegelmann Litauen scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

Panevėžys scoring profile: very strong

Panevėžys scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

21Goals scored (season)20
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
34Goals conceded (season)38
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
2.62Average goals in match2.76
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
10Goals conceded (last 5)11
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal67%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
19%2 goals24%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
14%3 goals5%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0%4 goals0%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal86%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
43%2 goals48%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
14%3 goals33%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
10%4 goals14%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Hegelmann Litauen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 21 matches
49%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
10%BTTS in both halves10%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
19%Scored in both halves10%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
80%BTTS - last 560%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hegelmann Litauen - half-time state
24% leading52% draw24% trailing
Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading24% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.24
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.48Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.95
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.24Average goals (1st half)1.52
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
52%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
62%No goal before half-time57%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.95
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
38%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys
52%No goal after half-time67%
Hegelmann LitauenPanevėžys

Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results

19% W43% R38% P
26
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding58%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Panevėžys - second-half results

19% W38% R43% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hegelmann Litauen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hegelmann Litauen
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
7
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
0
5
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hegelmann Litauen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

Hegelmann LitauenLigaPanevėžys
Average goals in match 2.622.62 2.76
Both teams scored 67%49% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%55% 62%
Clean sheets 14%32% 14%
Goal before half-time 62%69% 81%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Hegelmann Litauen 3 - 2 - 1 Panevėžys. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Panevėžys
1 : 1
Hegelmann Litauen
Panevėžys
1 : 1
Hegelmann Litauen
FK Panevėžys
0 : 1
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
3 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
3 : 0
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
FC Hegelmann Litauen Kaunas
2 : 1
FK Panevėžys

FAQ

What was the result of Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?

The A Lyga match finished Hegelmann Litauen 3:2 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Hegelmann Litauen won 3, Panevėžys won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?

Hegelmann Litauen score 1.00 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.95. The A Lyga average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Hegelmann Litauen's matches and 57% of Panevėžys's.

What form are Hegelmann Litauen and Panevėžys in?

Over the last 5 games Hegelmann Litauen have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Panevėžys 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys?

The statistical background for Hegelmann Litauen vs Panevėžys — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.