Denmark - 1st DivisionData current as of September 11, 2026

Hillerød vs Kolding IF: match statistics

Hillerød crest
Hillerød
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Kolding IF crest
Kolding IF

Hillerød vs Kolding IF: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Hillerød played against Kolding IF in 1st Division (Denmark). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Hillerød has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Kolding IF has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Hillerød scores 1.35 goals per game and allows 1.27. Kolding IF scores 1.23 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 69% of Hillerød's games and 54% of Kolding IF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 50%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kolding IF has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.38 per game. Hillerød takes 11.6 shots per game, while Kolding IF takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Hillerød leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Kolding IF leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.62 after halftime.

When the teams score

Hillerød's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For Kolding IF, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1st Division games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Hillerød holds a slight edge heading into this match: they sit 3rd and have scored 35 goals this season versus Kolding’s 32, and boast a +4 goal differential at home. Home advantage is evident in the numbers — Hillerød have won 46% of their home games, while Kolding win just 23% of their away fixtures. Home sides concede on average 1.00 goal for Hillerød compared to 1.31 conceded by Kolding on the road. In the last 5 matches Hillerød have scored only 3 goals and recorded 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (6 points, 1.2 pts/game), whereas Kolding have scored 6 goals but have 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (4 points, 0.8 pts/game) and have conceded 7 goals. Scoring chances are comparable (xG 1.42 for Hillerød vs 1.38 for Kolding) and shots per game are nearly equal (11.46 vs 11.85), but the home side register more shots on target (5.0 vs 4.08), boosting their offensive efficiency. Considering better recent defense (4 conceded by Hillerød vs 7 by Kolding), a higher home win rate and the advantage in shots on target, I forecast a Hillerød victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 54% (Hillerød 54%, Kolding IF 54%), while the league average BTTS is 56%, giving a baseline BTTS probability around 55-56%. In the last 5 matches Hillerød shows BTTS 40% and scores on average 0.6 goals while conceding 0.8, whereas Kolding has BTTS 60% and in five matches scored on average 1.2 goals and concedes 1.4, indicating the visitors score more often. xG comparison shows Hillerød xG_for 1.6 versus Kolding xG_against 1.51, and Kolding xG_for 1.38 versus Hillerød xG_against 1.38, so expected goal values for both sides lie in the 1.3-1.6 range and favor at least one goal being scored. Additionally, average shots on target 4.38 vs 4.08, conversion rates 9%/10% and the fact that each team has only 31% of matches with a clean sheet confirm there are enough chances for both teams to score. Taking these figures into account (seasonal 54-56%, recent xG and scoring form, e.g. Kolding last 5 matches xG_for 1.81 and 6 goals), I predict BTTS - Yes with probability 62% versus 38% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The forecast is based on xG and seasonal coefficients: the home side’s projected xG is 1.56 (calculated from xG_for_home 1.60 and xG_against_away 1.51), and the away side’s xG is 1.38 (xG_for_away 1.38 and xG_against_home 1.38), yielding a total of 2.94 expected goals. Seasonal data show Over 1.5 occurs frequently — 62% of Hillerød’s matches and 77% of Kolding’s matches (average ~70%) — so the gap between the projected 2.94 goals and the 1.5 threshold is significant. The 2.5 line is more balanced: seasonal Over 2.5 is 46% for the home team and 54% for the away team, and the league average is 2.78 goals per game; additionally, in the last 5 matches the away side has 60% Over 2.5 versus 20% for the home side, which nudges me slightly toward Over 2.5. The 3.5 line is unlikely — only 23% Over 3.5 seasonally for both teams, and the projected 2.94 goals is below 3.5, so Under 3.5 looks secure. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (estimated 85% probability), therefore I recommend backing Over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Hillerød are the favorites in this match: at home they average 1.62 points per game versus Kolding’s 1.0, they won 46% of matches (Kolding only 23%), and the goals average is 1.31 for Hillerød compared to 1.15 for the visitors. The home advantage is also supported by xG and shooting statistics — Hillerød have xG_for 1.6 versus Kolding’s 1.38, they average 14 shots with 4.38 on target, while Kolding record 11.85 shots and 4.08 on target. However, a draw at the break is more likely: Hillerød had a half-time draw in 5 of their last 5 matches (100% in the last 5), seasonally half-time draws for the home side occur in 38% of cases, and both teams score in the first half in only 8% of matches. In the second half Hillerød exert a stronger influence on the result — average points gained after the break are 1.46 for the home side vs 1.08 for the away side — and the overall xG and shot superiority increases the hosts’ chance of scoring the decisive goal after the break. As a result the most reliable scenario appears to be a draw at half-time and a Hillerød victory at full-time, therefore I select HT/FT 'X/1' as the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
HillerødKolding IF
11Shots9
HillerødKolding IF
3Shots on target2
HillerødKolding IF
1.24xG1.01
HillerødKolding IF
1Corners4
HillerødKolding IF
46Dangerous attacks40
HillerødKolding IF
8Fouls14
HillerødKolding IF
1Cards0
HillerødKolding IF

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

HillerødKolding IF
1.35Goals scored / game1.23
HillerødKolding IF
1.27Goals allowed / game1.15
HillerødKolding IF
50%Average possession53%
HillerødKolding IF
4.77Shots on target / game4.23
HillerødKolding IF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.58Shots per game12.96
HillerødKolding IF
4.77Shots on target4.23
HillerødKolding IF
11.6%Shot conversion9.5%
HillerødKolding IF
50%Possession53%
HillerødKolding IF
1.38xG for1.49
HillerødKolding IF
1.41xG against1.44
HillerødKolding IF

Shooting quality

Hillerød: BalancedKolding IF: Balanced
HillerødKolding IF
Accuracy (shots on target)41%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Hillerød is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Hillerød · 0.8 pts / game - Kolding IF

Hillerød
WDDDL
Season result split
38% W38% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-6
1.54 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Kolding IF
WDLLL
Season result split
35% W27% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-10
1.31 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hillerød is 10% better for: goals scored per game.

1.35 goals / game - Hillerød · 1.23 goals / game - Kolding IF

Kolding IF is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.27 goals / game - Hillerød · 1.15 goals / game - Kolding IF

Hillerød scoring profile: very strong

Hillerød scores in 81% of games (21 of 26 meczów), while Kolding IF keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 meczów).

Kolding IF scoring profile: very strong

Kolding IF scores in 77% of games (20 of 26 meczów), while Hillerød keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 meczów).

35Goals scored (season)32
HillerødKolding IF
33Goals conceded (season)30
HillerødKolding IF
2.62Average goals per game2.38
HillerødKolding IF
3Goals scored (last 5)6
HillerødKolding IF
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
HillerødKolding IF

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal77%
HillerødKolding IF
42%2 goals35%
HillerødKolding IF
12%3 goals12%
HillerødKolding IF
0%4 goals0%
HillerødKolding IF

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal69%
HillerødKolding IF
31%2 goals35%
HillerødKolding IF
19%3 goals12%
HillerødKolding IF
0%4 goals0%
HillerødKolding IF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time8%
HillerødKolding IF
0%BTTS in both halves0%
HillerødKolding IF
27%Scored in both halves19%
HillerødKolding IF

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
HillerødKolding IF
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
HillerødKolding IF
40%BTTS - last 560%
HillerødKolding IF

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
HillerødKolding IF
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
HillerødKolding IF
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
HillerødKolding IF

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
HillerødKolding IF
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
HillerødKolding IF
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
HillerødKolding IF

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kolding IF is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / game - Hillerød · 1.46 pts / game - Kolding IF

Hillerød - half-time state
31% leading42% draw27% trailing
Kolding IF - half-time state
38% leading31% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per game (1st half)1.46
HillerødKolding IF
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.62
HillerødKolding IF
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
HillerødKolding IF
1.35Average goals (1st half)1.04
HillerødKolding IF
50%Clean sheet before half-time69%
HillerødKolding IF
50%No goal before half-time54%
HillerødKolding IF

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per game (2nd half)1.27
HillerødKolding IF
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
HillerødKolding IF
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
HillerødKolding IF
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.35
HillerødKolding IF
58%Clean sheet after half-time50%
HillerødKolding IF
42%No goal after half-time50%
HillerødKolding IF

Hillerød - second-half results

27% W50% D23% L
35
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kolding IF - second-half results

31% W35% D35% L
38
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 35%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Hillerød - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.8
Average goals per game0.01.4
1 goal0%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Kolding IF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Hillerød
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
7
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
6
7
46-60
4
6
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Kolding IF
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
9
7
31-45
5
6
46-60
4
5
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Hillerød

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Kolding IF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).

Teams vs league

HillerødLigaKolding IF
Average goals per game 2.622.79 2.38
Both teams scored 69%56% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%55% 50%
Clean sheets 23%26% 31%
Goal before half-time 73%73% 69%
Goal after half-time 69%80% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / game
1.30
Away goals / game
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HillerødSubstitutionOn: Tobias ArndalOff: Rezan Corlu
  2. HillerødSubstitutionOn: Berzan KücükylidizOff: Marinus Due Grandt
  3. HillerødYellow cardSebastian Larsen
  4. HillerødSubstitutionOn: Cornelius AllenOff: Lucas Bøje-Larsen
  5. HillerødSubstitutionOn: Kasper EnghardtOff: Sebastian Larsen
  6. Kolding IFSubstitutionOn: Abdul Samad Shahzad ArshadOff: Filip Lesniak

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Hillerød's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Kolding IF. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Hillerød Fodbold
1 : 1
Kolding IF
Kolding IF
0 : 0
Hillerød Fodbold

FAQ

What was the result of Hillerød vs Kolding IF?

The 1st Division match finished Hillerød 2:0 Kolding IF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hillerød and Kolding IF?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Hillerød won 0, Kolding IF won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hillerød vs Kolding IF?

Hillerød score 1.35 goals per game on average and Kolding IF 1.23. The 1st Division average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Hillerød's matches and 54% of Kolding IF's.

What form are Hillerød and Kolding IF in?

Over the last 5 games Hillerød have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Kolding IF 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hillerød vs Kolding IF?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.