HJK vs TPS: match statistics
HJK vs TPS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
HJK played against TPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 26, 2026. Venue: Bolt Arena. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
HJK has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. TPS has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
HJK scores 1.69 goals per game and allows 1.25. TPS scores 1.25 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of HJK's games and 56% of TPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 50%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
HJK has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.45 per game. HJK takes 13.0 shots per game, while TPS takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
HJK leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 1.06 goals per game after halftime. TPS leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
HJK's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For TPS, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Veikkausliiga games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
HJK is the favorite in this match: the hosts have scored 27 goals this season versus TPS’s 20, and at home they average 1.5 goals per game while TPS average only 0.71 goals per away match. The difference in quality of chances is clear — HJK register 4.63 shots on target at home with an 11% conversion rate, whereas TPS have 3.71 shots on target away and only a 6% conversion, meaning the hosts convert their chances into goals almost twice as often. Defensively the hosts also look stronger: HJK concede 1.38 goals per home game and keep 38% clean sheets, while TPS concede 1.43 goals away and have only 14% clean sheets; furthermore the visitors have yet to record an away win (0% away wins). In the last 5 matches HJK average 1.8 points per game and have won 3 of the last 5, while TPS average 1.4 points per game with only 2 wins in that period, confirming the home advantage. Considering the superior efficiency (11% vs 6%), the lower share of matches without scoring (25% vs 43%) and the favorable home record (50% wins and a +1 goal difference versus -5 away), I forecast a HJK victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates of 56% (HJK at home) and 57% (TPS away), providing a baseline signal for BTTS - Yes. HJK score an average of 1.67 goals at home, register 4.89 shots on target and a conversion rate of 15%, so the hosts are likely to find the net. TPS away have a low goals average of 0.71 and only 6% conversion, but their xG_for_avg_away is 1.5 (last 5 matches xG 1.79), indicating chance creation despite poor finishing. HJK have kept a clean sheet in 44% of home matches, while TPS have a clean sheet rate away of only 14%, so the hosts’ defensive potential limits BTTS, but the xG balance and seasonal BTTS rates (56–57%) prevail. On this basis I assign 58% to BTTS = Yes and 42% to BTTS = No, selecting the more likely “Yes.”
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model combining xG and goals-per-game projects 1.48 expected goals for HJK and 1.18 for TPS, totaling 2.66 goals. This is near the league average of 2.67 and clearly above the 1.5 threshold, while slightly above the 2.5 threshold. Season-long stats show HJK with Over 1.5 in 78% of matches, TPS in 57% (average 68%), and in the last 5 matches both teams produced Over 2.5 in 80% of cases, reinforcing the goals forecast. Additionally, HJK scores 1.67 goals per game with a 15% shot conversion rate versus TPS’s 0.71 goals and 6% conversion, and xG of 1.41 (HJK) and 1.50 (TPS) — these figures indicate both sides create chances with conversion potential. On this basis the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (≈80% probability), although Over 2.5 is also supported (≈68%) by the 2.66 expected goals and recent form; I recommend playing Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics clearly favor HJK: the hosts win 67% of home matches and score an average of 1.67 goals per game versus 0.71 for TPS, while HJK’s season average points is 2.11 compared to 0.43 for TPS. At Half-Time HJK score on average 0.78 goals, with TPS only 0.29; in the last 5 matches HJK led at the break in 60% of games whereas TPS did so in 20%. HJK in the second half score on average 0.89 goals and concede 0.44, and the home side’s shot conversion rate is 15% versus 6% for TPS, which suggests maintaining or increasing the lead. Although the away xG is 1.5 versus 1.41 for the hosts, TPS’s low conversion and 0% away wins in the seasonal data limit their realistic chances, therefore the most likely scenario is HJK leading at the break and winning the match (1/1), with an alternative scenario of a draw at Half-Time followed by an HJK turnaround to win (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| HJK | TPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
HJK is 35% better for: goals scored per game.
1.69 goals / game - HJK · 1.25 goals / game - TPS
TPS is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - HJK · 1.19 goals / game - TPS
HJK scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).
TPS scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 meczów), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - HJK
Over / Under - TPS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
HJK is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - HJK · 1 pts / game - TPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
HJK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
TPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
HJK
TPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| HJK | Liga | TPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.94 | 2.66 | ▼ 2.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 52% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 27% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 76% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 78% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from HJK's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against TPS. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of HJK vs TPS?
The Veikkausliiga match finished HJK 1:0 TPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before HJK vs TPS?
HJK score 1.69 goals per game on average and TPS 1.25. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 44% of HJK's matches and 56% of TPS's.
What form are HJK and TPS in?
Over the last 5 games HJK have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and TPS 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HJK vs TPS?
The statistical background for HJK vs TPS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


