Hungerford Town vs Sholing: match statistics
Sholing is showing significantly better form and results this season. The hosts, Hungerford Town, have a negative home record of 9-9-17 with a goal difference of -12, and a poor 29% win rate in home matches. The visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals and conceding only 5, which gives them 2.6 points per game over the last five. Sholing also boasts better defensive statistics away from home (1.13 goals conceded on average) and a 40% clean sheet rate. Hungerford's form is alarming with only 0.8 points per game in their last five matches and a DLWLL sequence, while Sholing is on an impressive WDWWW run. All indicators point to an advantage for the visitors, although a draw is also possible considering Sholing's high draw percentage away from home (47%).
Hungerford Town vs Sholing: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Hungerford Town played against Sholing in Southern League Premier South (England). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Hungerford Town has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Sholing has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Hungerford Town scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 2.09. Sholing scores 1.88 and allows 1.30. Games in this league average 3.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 69% of Hungerford Town's games and 64% of Sholing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 69% and 52%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Hungerford Town has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.41 per game. Hungerford Town takes 3.1 shots per game, while Sholing takes 2.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Hungerford Town leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. Sholing leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.94 after halftime.
When the teams score
Hungerford Town's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (13 goals). For Sholing, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Southern League Premier South games average 3.17 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 8.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sholing is showing significantly better form and results this season. The hosts, Hungerford Town, have a negative home record of 9-9-17 with a goal difference of -12, and a poor 29% win rate in home matches. The visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals and conceding only 5, which gives them 2.6 points per game over the last five. Sholing also boasts better defensive statistics away from home (1.13 goals conceded on average) and a 40% clean sheet rate. Hungerford's form is alarming with only 0.8 points per game in their last five matches and a DLWLL sequence, while Sholing is on an impressive WDWWW run. All indicators point to an advantage for the visitors, although a draw is also possible considering Sholing's high draw percentage away from home (47%).
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Hungerford Town | Sholing | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 17% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.47 | 0.67 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.16 | 5.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sholing is 225% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Hungerford Town · 2.6 pts / game - Sholing
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sholing is 49% better for: goals scored per game.
1.26 goals / game - Hungerford Town · 1.88 goals / game - Sholing
Sholing is 61% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.09 goals / game - Hungerford Town · 1.3 goals / game - Sholing
Hungerford Town scores in 74% of games (26 of 35 meczów), while Sholing keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 meczów).
Sholing scores in 88% of games (29 of 33 meczów), while Hungerford Town keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 35 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hungerford Town
Over / Under - Sholing
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sholing is 105% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.74 pts / game - Hungerford Town · 1.52 pts / game - Sholing
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hungerford Town - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sholing - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (21). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Hungerford Town
Sholing
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Southern League Premier South).
Teams vs league
| Hungerford Town | Liga | Sholing | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.34 | 3.17 | • 3.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 61% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 61% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 22% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 83% | • 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Hungerford TownGoalCharlie Austin
Head-to-head
Record from Hungerford Town's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Sholing. Games average 8.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Hungerford Town vs Sholing?
The Southern League Premier South match finished Hungerford Town 1:1 Sholing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Hungerford Town vs Sholing?
Hungerford Town score 1.26 goals per game on average and Sholing 1.88. The Southern League Premier South average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Hungerford Town's matches and 64% of Sholing's.
What form are Hungerford Town and Sholing in?
Over the last 5 games Hungerford Town have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sholing 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hungerford Town vs Sholing?
The statistical background for Hungerford Town vs Sholing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.