Hwaseong vs Cheongju: match statistics
Hwaseong vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Hwaseong played against Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Hwaseong has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Cheongju has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Hwaseong scores 1.55 goals per game and allows 1.05. Cheongju scores 1.18 and allows 1.59. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Hwaseong's games and 77% of Cheongju's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 55%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Hwaseong has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.44 per game. Hwaseong takes 12.1 shots per game, while Cheongju takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Hwaseong leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Cheongju leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
Hwaseong's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Cheongju, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hwaseong have a clear attacking edge at home, averaging 1.73 goals from 1.56 xG, while Cheongju score 1.20 goals and create 1.26 xG away from home. The hosts also register more shots on target (5.07 vs 3.60) and are less likely to be held scoreless, which happens in 13% of their matches compared with 30% for the visitors. Hwaseong concede an average of 1.13 goals at home, whereas Cheongju allow 1.40 away, and the visitors have conceded as many as 10 goals in their last five matches. However, Cheongju are highly draw-prone on the road, having drawn 80% of their away matches, so a closely fought contest remains a realistic scenario. Nevertheless, the edge in chance quality, finishing efficiency and the number of opportunities created points to a narrow Hwaseong victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal BTTS rate is as high as 83% for Hwaseong and 70% for Cheongju, well above the league average of 63%. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 17% of their matches, while the visitors have done so in 20%, which supports the expectation of a goal from both sides. Cheongju have conceded an average of 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches, while Hwaseong have produced 1.79 xG and scored 1.6 goals per game over the same period. The visitors also have attacking arguments: their recent xG stands at 1.48, while Hwaseong, despite improved defensive form, have allowed an average of 1.53 xG. The only weaker signal is Hwaseong's 40% BTTS rate across their last five appearances, but the long-term data for both teams and the vulnerability of their defenses support the BTTS - Yes selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The Over 1.5 goals line was covered in 83% of Hwaseong’s matches and 80% of Cheongju’s, providing very strong support for at least two goals. Hwaseong creates chances worth an average of 1.58 xG and records 13.42 shots per match, while Cheongju concedes an average of 1.40 goals. The visitors have conceded as many as 2.0 goals per match across their last five games, while Hwaseong has scored 1.6 goals per match over the same period. Both teams regularly allow their opponents to score, with the hosts conceding in 83% and the visitors in 80% of matches. The projected total of 2.75 goals also points to a chance of Over 2.5, but Over 1.5 remains clearly the safest selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Hwaseong have a clearly superior record in terms of opening phases over their last five matches: they held the lead at the break in 40% of games, scoring an average of 1.0 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.2, while Cheongju scored 0.4 and conceded 1.0 during this phase. The visitors were trailing at half-time in 40% of their last five appearances, reinforcing the scenario of the hosts having the advantage in the first half. Over the course of the season, Hwaseong have created more chances, with an average xG of 1.58 compared with Cheongju’s 1.26, and have averaged 13.42 shots per match versus their opponents’ 9.7. Cheongju have recorded draws in as many as 80% of their matches, but win only 10%, so if the hosts take the lead, they should have the best chance of maintaining it until full-time. The main risk is Hwaseong’s weaker defensive performance after the break, when they concede an average of 1.17 goals, but the most likely single outcome remains a 1/1 HT/FT result, with the hosts leading at half-time and winning at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Hwaseong | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Hwaseong is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Hwaseong · 1.2 pts / game - Cheongju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hwaseong is 31% better for: goals scored per game.
1.55 goals / game - Hwaseong · 1.18 goals / game - Cheongju
Hwaseong is 51% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.05 goals / game - Hwaseong · 1.59 goals / game - Cheongju
Hwaseong scores in 73% of games (16 of 22 meczów), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 meczów).
Cheongju scores in 82% of games (18 of 22 meczów), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hwaseong
Over / Under - Cheongju
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hwaseong is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Hwaseong · 1.27 pts / game - Cheongju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hwaseong - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Hwaseong
Cheongju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Hwaseong | Liga | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.59 | 2.72 | • 2.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 62% | ▲ 77% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 53% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 23% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 69% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 78% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Hwaseong's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Cheongju. Games average 2.75 goals, and both teams scored in 75% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Hwaseong vs Cheongju?
The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 2:1 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Hwaseong and Cheongju?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Hwaseong won 3, Cheongju won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Cheongju?
Hwaseong score 1.55 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.18. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Hwaseong's matches and 77% of Cheongju's.
What form are Hwaseong and Cheongju in?
Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Cheongju 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Cheongju?
The statistical background for Hwaseong vs Cheongju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


