South Korea - K League 2Data current as of September 20, 2026

Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics

Hwaseong crest
Hwaseong
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land

Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Hwaseong played against Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on August 7, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Hwaseong has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Seoul E-Land has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Hwaseong scores 1.79 goals per game and allows 1.16. Seoul E-Land scores 1.89 and allows 1.32. Games in this league average 2.82 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 58% of Hwaseong's games and 68% of Seoul E-Land's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 79%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Seoul E-Land has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.49 per game. Hwaseong takes 11.8 shots per game, while Seoul E-Land takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Hwaseong leads at halftime in 47% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Seoul E-Land leads at halftime in 32% and scores 1.26 after halftime.

When the teams score

Hwaseong's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Seoul E-Land, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.82 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Hwaseong are in excellent current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches while remaining unbeaten, scoring as many as 18 goals during that run. At home, the hosts average 1.86 goals per match with a 15% shooting conversion rate, and have failed to score in just 7% of their fixtures; Seoul E-Land have a 20% figure away from home. The visitors sit higher in 2nd place and are slightly better at creating away chances, with an xG of 1.62 compared with Hwaseong’s 1.55, while also winning 60% of their matches on the road. However, Seoul E-Land’s defense concedes an average of 1.10 goals away from home, while the in-form hosts have scored 18 goals in their last five matches. Home advantage and Hwaseong’s clearly superior current momentum give them a slight edge, although the closely matched metrics of both teams also increase the likelihood of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal data clearly favors goals from both sides: BTTS occurred in 78% of Hwaseong matches and 60% of Seoul E-Land matches, compared with the league average of 64%. The signal is even stronger across the last five matches, with Hwaseong recording BTTS in 80% of games and Seoul E-Land in as many as 100%. During this period, the hosts averaged 3.6 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while the visitors scored 2.6 and conceded 2.2 goals per match. The attacking potential is supported by similar xG figures from the last five outings: 1.55 for Hwaseong and 1.83 for Seoul E-Land, alongside high opponents’ xG values of 1.79 and 1.57, respectively. A scenario in which one team fails to score is less likely, especially since Hwaseong have failed to score in none of their league matches this season, while clean sheets for both teams have occurred in only 22% and 30% of matches. Therefore, BTTS - Yes (Goal/Goal) is the preferred selection over BTTS - No (No Goal), which means that at least one team fails to score—not automatically a 0:0 draw or a match in which neither team scores.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams are in excellent attacking form: Hwaseong have averaged 3.6 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Seoul E-Land have averaged 2.6. At the same time, the hosts conceded 1.8 goals per match during this period, compared with as many as 2.2 for the visitors, clearly supporting an open game. Across the season, at least 2 goals were scored in 89% of Hwaseong matches and 80% of Seoul E-Land matches, while Over 2.5 goals landed in 89% and 70%, respectively. Their chance-creation potential is comparable, with both teams posting an average xG of 1.62, while each side records more than 5 shots on target per match. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals: even with a more conservative adjustment for the high recent finishing efficiency, the data for both teams points to a high probability of at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Hwaseong have a clear advantage in opening periods: they were leading at half-time in 56% of their matches this season and in as many as 80% of their last five, scoring an average of 1.8 goals before the break during that span. Seoul E-Land were ahead after 45 minutes in only 10% of matches and failed to lead at half-time in any of their last five, averaging just 0.4 goals in the first half. The hosts are also highly reliable defensively before the break, conceding an average of 0.44 goals, and only 0.2 across their last five appearances. After the interval, the visitors are more dangerous, scoring an average of 1.3 goals, so turnaround scenarios remain a significant possibility. Nevertheless, Hwaseong won 80% of their last five matches, while their 16% finishing efficiency compared with the opponent's 13% supports the HT/FT 1/1 scenario, with the hosts taking the lead at the break and maintaining their winning position until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

40Possession (%)60
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
9Shots8
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
2Shots on target1
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
1.08xG0.91
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
2Corners1
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
51Dangerous attacks45
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
8Fouls7
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
0Cards1
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

HwaseongSeoul E-Land
1.79Goals scored / game1.89
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
1.16Goals allowed / game1.32
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
47%Average possession50%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
4.84Shots on target / game5.53
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.84Shots per game13.32
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
4.84Shots on target5.53
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
15.1%Shot conversion14.2%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
47%Possession50%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
1.49xG for1.63
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
1.44xG against1.32
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

Shooting quality

Hwaseong: Counter-attackingSeoul E-Land: Efficient finishing
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
Accuracy (shots on target)41%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Seoul E-Land is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Hwaseong · 2 pts / game - Seoul E-Land

Hwaseong
LLWWW
Season result split
53% W21% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-5
1.79 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Seoul E-Land
LWDWW
Season result split
58% W16% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-5
1.89 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 6% better for: goals scored per game.

1.79 goals / game - Hwaseong · 1.89 goals / game - Seoul E-Land

Hwaseong is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.16 goals / game - Hwaseong · 1.32 goals / game - Seoul E-Land

Hwaseong scoring profile: very strong

Hwaseong scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 games), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 games).

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 89% of games (17 of 19 games), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 games).

34Goals scored (season)36
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
22Goals conceded (season)25
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
2.95Average goals per game3.21
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
13Goals scored (last 5)12
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal89%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
58%2 goals63%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
26%3 goals32%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
5%4 goals5%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal74%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
42%2 goals42%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
5%3 goals16%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time26%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
5%BTTS in both halves5%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
42%Scored in both halves37%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS68%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
80%BTTS - last 5100%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time68%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hwaseong is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.63 pts / game - Hwaseong · 1.42 pts / game - Seoul E-Land

Hwaseong - half-time state
47% leading21% draw32% trailing
Seoul E-Land - half-time state
32% leading47% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.63Points per game (1st half)1.42
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
0.84Goals scored (1st half)0.63
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.11
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
58%Clean sheet before half-time53%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
42%No goal before half-time47%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

After half-time (2nd half)

1.79Points per game (2nd half)1.95
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
0.95Goals scored (2nd half)1.26
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
1.58Average goals (2nd half)2.11
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
47%Clean sheet after half-time42%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land
32%No goal after half-time26%
HwaseongSeoul E-Land

Hwaseong - second-half results

47% W37% D16% L
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

58% W21% D21% L
27
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding181%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Hwaseong - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.401.40
Goals scored / game1.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game1.82.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+7-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 8
Seoul E-Land - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.40
Goals scored / game0.42.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game0.83.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%80%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Hwaseong
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
7
3
16-30
8
4
31-45
7
1
46-60
5
3
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
5
2
46-60
8
4
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Hwaseong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

HwaseongLigaSeoul E-Land
Average goals per game 2.952.82 3.21
Both teams scored 58%64% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%56% 79%
Clean sheets 32%22% 26%
Goal before half-time 89%72% 74%
Goal after half-time 79%78% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / game
1.39
Away goals / game
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Ju-hwan KimOff: Seo-Joon Bae
  2. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Hyeon-Je KangOff: Elosman Euller Silva Cavalcanti
  3. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Oh-Kyu KimOff: In-pyo Oh
  4. Seoul E-LandYellow cardOh-Kyu Kim
  5. HwaseongSubstitutionOn: Byeong-hun LimOff: Leonard Pllana

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Hwaseong's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss against Seoul E-Land. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Seoul E-Land
1 : 2
Hwaseong
Seoul E-Land FC
1 : 1
Hwaseong FC
Seoul E-Land FC
0 : 0
Hwaseong FC
Hwaseong FC
0 : 1
Seoul E-Land FC

FAQ

What was the result of Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land?

The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 0:0 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hwaseong and Seoul E-Land?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Hwaseong won 1, Seoul E-Land won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land?

Hwaseong score 1.79 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.89. The K League 2 average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Hwaseong's matches and 68% of Seoul E-Land's.

What form are Hwaseong and Seoul E-Land in?

Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Seoul E-Land?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.