Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong: match statistics
Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Seoul E-Land played against Hwaseong in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Seoul E-Land has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Hwaseong has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Seoul E-Land scores 1.88 goals per game and allows 0.88. Hwaseong scores 1.00 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.87 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Seoul E-Land's games and 38% of Hwaseong's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 38%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Seoul E-Land has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.43 per game. Seoul E-Land takes 12.3 shots per game, while Hwaseong takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Seoul E-Land leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Hwaseong leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Seoul E-Land's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Hwaseong, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.87 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Seoul E-Land holds a clear advantage in form and attack: at home they average 2.0 goals per game, record 5.33 shots on target and 13 attempts per match, and over the last 5 fixtures have scored 11 goals and won 4 of 5. Hwaseong on the road averages 0.0 goals, has 100% FTS (failed to score in every away match), only 2.0 shots on target and 8.5 attempts, and have lost all away games (Loss% 100). The quality gap is confirmed by xG: Seoul E-Land have 1.52 xG at home versus 1.15 xG for Hwaseong away, and conversion rates of 15% vs 0%, indicating far more efficient chance-taking from the hosts. Defensively the hosts concede 1.0 goal per home game and keep clean sheets in 67% of matches, while the visitors have no clean sheets away and concede 1.0 on average. Considering the hosts’ 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches versus the visitors’ 1.0, combined with superiority in shots and efficiency, I project a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS at 'No' 70% and 'Yes' 30%. Seoul E-Land in the last 5 matches scored 11 and conceded 2 (avg 2.2 scored, 0.4 conceded), while Hwaseong in their last 5 have 4 scored and 6 conceded (0.8 and 1.2), indicating a clear home advantage. Seasonally Seoul records 1.33 goals per game and has 50% clean sheets at home, whereas Hwaseong has a seasonal goals-per-game of 0.0 and 0% clean sheets, with an average of 2.0 shots on target and 0.0% conversion rate for the visitors. xG favors Seoul: hosts have xG_for 1.53 and Hwaseong xG_for 1.15; simultaneously Seoul usually concedes xG 1.36 and Hwaseong concedes 1.03, showing the hosts create more chances. Although the league BTTS is 63% overall, Hwaseong’s poor efficiency and low shots on target increase the likelihood the visitors will not score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals projection is 1.70 for Seoul E-Land and 1.05 for Hwaseong, totaling 2.75. Home xG is 1.53 versus 1.15 for the away side, and the xG sum (1.53+1.15=2.68) together with recent form over the last 5 matches (home 2.2 + away 0.8 = 3.0) indicate an expected range of 2.7–3.0. The home side averages 12.5 shots with 4.5 on target and a conversion rate of 11%, translating to roughly 1.4–1.5 goals and confirming an offensive edge over the visitors (8.5 shots, 2.0 on target). Seasonally Seoul E-Land have 67% of matches over 1.5 goals and the league averages 2.81 goals per game, so the strongest signal favors Over 1.5; Over 2.5 has a moderate edge (~63%), while Over 3.5 is unlikely.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seoul E-Land is clearly in superior form: in the last 5 matches they have won 80% (4 of 5) and average 2.2 goals, whereas Hwaseong have 20% wins (1 of 5) and average 0.8 goals. At half-time in the last 5 matches the home side were level in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and leading in 40% (2 of 5), while the visitors were behind at the break in 60% of those five games, indicating a frequent draw after 45 minutes. Second-half performance is decisive: Seoul average 1.4 goals in the second half and 2.6 points per match after the break over their last 5, whereas Hwaseong record 0.6 goals and 1.4 points in the same samples. Seoul generate an xG of 1.53 versus 1.15 for the visitors, but Hwaseong have a season-long goals scored average of 0.0 and a shot conversion rate of 0.0%, i.e. they do not convert created chances; therefore the strongest signal from the data is a draw at half-time and a home win (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Seoul E-Land | Hwaseong | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Seoul E-Land is 160% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Seoul E-Land · 1 pts / game - Hwaseong
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 88% better for: goals scored per game.
1.88 goals / game - Seoul E-Land · 1 goals / game - Hwaseong
Seoul E-Land is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.88 goals / game - Seoul E-Land · 1.13 goals / game - Hwaseong
Seoul E-Land scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 meczów).
Hwaseong scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 meczów), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
Over / Under - Hwaseong
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seoul E-Land is 127% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Seoul E-Land · 0.88 pts / game - Hwaseong
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Hwaseong - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Seoul E-Land
Hwaseong
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seoul E-Land | Liga | Hwaseong | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.75 | 2.87 | ▼ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 65% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 59% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 21% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 81% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 75% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Seoul E-Land's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against Hwaseong. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong?
The K League 2 match finished Seoul E-Land 1:2 Hwaseong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Seoul E-Land and Hwaseong?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Seoul E-Land won 1, Hwaseong won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong?
Seoul E-Land score 1.88 goals per game on average and Hwaseong 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 38% of Hwaseong's.
What form are Seoul E-Land and Hwaseong in?
Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Hwaseong 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.