South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong: match statistics

Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Hwaseong crest
Hwaseong

Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Seoul E-Land play Hwaseong in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 07:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Hwaseong: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Seoul E-Land scores 1.76 and concedes 1.24 goals per match. Hwaseong scores 1.53 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Seoul E-Land 65%, Hwaseong 53%. Over 2.5: Seoul E-Land 76%, Hwaseong 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.47. Seoul E-Land: 13.3 shots per match, Hwaseong: 11.8.

Match halves

Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.12. Hwaseong: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (10 goals). Hwaseong: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-2-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Seoul E-Land holds a clear advantage in form and attack: at home they average 2.0 goals per game, record 5.33 shots on target and 13 attempts per match, and over the last 5 fixtures have scored 11 goals and won 4 of 5. Hwaseong on the road averages 0.0 goals, has 100% FTS (failed to score in every away match), only 2.0 shots on target and 8.5 attempts, and have lost all away games (Loss% 100). The quality gap is confirmed by xG: Seoul E-Land have 1.52 xG at home versus 1.15 xG for Hwaseong away, and conversion rates of 15% vs 0%, indicating far more efficient chance-taking from the hosts. Defensively the hosts concede 1.0 goal per home game and keep clean sheets in 67% of matches, while the visitors have no clean sheets away and concede 1.0 on average. Considering the hosts’ 2.6 points per game in the last 5 matches versus the visitors’ 1.0, combined with superiority in shots and efficiency, I project a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
16Shots5
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
4Shots on target3
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
1.91xG0.73
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
6Corners2
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
85Dangerous attacks26
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
11Fouls12
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
0Cards2
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Seoul E-LandHwaseong
1.76Goals scored / match1.53
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
1.24Goals conceded / match1.12
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
50%Average possession47%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
5.41Shots on target / match4.59
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.29Shots per match11.76
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
5.41Shots on target4.59
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
13.3%Shot conversion13%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
50%Possession47%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
1.61xG for1.47
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
1.24xG against1.34
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

Shooting quality

Seoul E-Land: Efficient finishingHwaseong: Counter-attacking
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
Accuracy (shots on target)41%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 11% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.8 pts / match - Hwaseong

Seoul E-Land
WWLWD
Season result split
53% W18% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-5
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Hwaseong
WWLLW
Season result split
47% W24% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.76 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.53 goals / match - Hwaseong

Hwaseong is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.24 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.12 goals / match - Hwaseong

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).

Hwaseong scoring profile: very strong

Hwaseong scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

30Goals scored (season)26
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
21Goals conceded (season)19
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
3Average goals in match2.65
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
10Goals scored (last 5)10
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal82%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
59%2 goals53%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
29%3 goals18%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
0%4 goals0%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal65%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
41%2 goals41%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
12%3 goals6%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
0%4 goals0%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time12%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
35%Scored in both halves35%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
80%BTTS - last 560%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing
Hwaseong - half-time state
41% leading24% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.47
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.24
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
53%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
47%No goal before half-time47%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

After half-time (2nd half)

1.82Points per match (2nd half)1.82
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
1.12Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.41
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
47%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong
29%No goal after half-time35%
Seoul E-LandHwaseong

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

53% W24% R24% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hwaseong - second-half results

47% W41% R12% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Hwaseong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
5
4
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Hwaseong
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
4
31-45
6
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-65%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Hwaseong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Seoul E-LandLigaHwaseong
Average goals in match 3.002.75 2.65
Both teams scored 65%61% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 76%56% 53%
Clean sheets 29%24% 35%
Goal before half-time 76%73% 88%
Goal after half-time 88%76% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Seoul E-Land 1 - 2 - 0 Hwaseong. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Seoul E-Land FC
1 : 1
Hwaseong FC
Seoul E-Land FC
0 : 0
Hwaseong FC
Hwaseong FC
0 : 1
Seoul E-Land FC

FAQ

What was the result of Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong?

The K League 2 match finished Seoul E-Land 1:2 Hwaseong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Seoul E-Land and Hwaseong?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Seoul E-Land won 1, Hwaseong won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong?

Seoul E-Land score 1.76 goals per game on average and Hwaseong 1.53. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 53% of Hwaseong's.

What form are Seoul E-Land and Hwaseong in?

Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Hwaseong 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Hwaseong?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.