Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildHásteinsvöllurData current as of September 03, 2026

ÍBV vs KA: match statistics

ÍBV crest
ÍBV
2 : 2half-time 0:1
KA crest
KA

ÍBV vs KA: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

ÍBV played against KA in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on July 19, 2026. Venue: Hásteinsvöllur. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

ÍBV has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. KA has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

ÍBV scores 1.71 goals per game and allows 2.21. KA scores 1.57 and allows 2.14. Games in this league average 4.05 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 79% of ÍBV's games and 71% of KA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 64%, compared with league averages of 75% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KA has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.33 per game. ÍBV takes 11.4 shots per game, while KA takes 14.7.

First-half and second-half trends

ÍBV leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. KA leads at halftime in 14% and scores 1.07 after halftime.

When the teams score

ÍBV's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For KA, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Úrvalsdeild games average 4.05 goals. Both teams score in 75% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

ÍBV comes into the match in better form — in the last 5 games they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, scoring 10 and conceding 8, averaging 2.0 PPG. KA in the same period has only 1 win and 4 losses, also scoring 10 but conceding 15 and averaging just 0.6 PPG. At home ÍBV scores 1.86 and concedes 1.86 with average xG for 1.32 and xG against 1.39, while KA as an away side scores 1.57 and concedes 2.29 with xG for 1.73 and xG against 2.27. KA generates more shots (14.29 vs 11.14) and slightly more shots on target (4.86 vs 4.57), but has a lower conversion rate 11% versus ÍBV’s 17%, meaning the hosts convert chances more efficiently. Considering the form advantage (PPG 2.0 vs 0.6), higher attacking efficiency of ÍBV and KA’s significantly weaker defense (15 conceded in the last 5 vs 8 for ÍBV), I forecast a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show strong BTTS profiles: ÍBV 57% and KA 86% this season, versus a league average of 74%. In the last 5 matches ÍBV registered BTTS in 80% of games, KA in 100%, with both teams averaging 2.0 goals per game in that period. Defenses are underperforming — season average goals conceded are 2.0 for ÍBV and 2.29 for KA, while in the last 5 rounds KA concedes 3.0 goals per game (15 conceded) versus ÍBV conceding 1.6 (8 conceded). xG confirms both create chances: attack xG 1.64 (ÍBV) vs 1.73 (KA) and xG against 1.73 vs 2.27; additionally only 14% of matches ended in a clean sheet for either side, and KA has 0% matches without scoring this season. Given this, I project BTTS at 85% (Yes) vs 15% (No) and recommend a Yes bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams generate high goal potential: home xG is 1.64, away xG 1.73, and KA concedes on average 2.27 xG per match, translating to total expected goals around 3.69 (1.96 for ÍBV and 1.73 for KA). Seasonally 57% of ÍBV’s matches and 71% of KA’s matches finish over 2.5 goals, while the league’s share of over 2.5 games is 72%, which is a strong signal for Over 2.5 goals. Additionally, both teams have a high BTTS rate: 57% for the home side and 86% for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches each team scored 10 goals (2.0 per game on average), with KA conceding an average of 3.0 goals across those five fixtures. Considering xG=3.69, the high BTTS and the history of overs, the best line to play is Over 2.5 (estimated 75% probability).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back 1/1 (ÍBV leads at the break and wins the match) because the strongest signal comes from form over the last five matches: ÍBV won 3 of 5 (60%) and led at the break in 2 of 5 (40%), while KA has only 1 win in the last 5 (20%) and led at the break in 1 of 5 (20%). At half-time ÍBV averages 1.2 goals in the last five matches versus 0.8 for KA, and seasonally the half-time goal average is 0.71 for ÍBV and 0.29 for KA, indicating the home side’s advantage in the first half. Despite similar xG (ÍBV 1.64 vs KA 1.73), KA concedes 2.27 xG per match on average versus 1.73 for ÍBV, so they are more vulnerable to conceding. Additionally, the hosts have better points-per-game in the last five (2.0 ppg vs 0.6 ppg for KA) and 86% of ÍBV’s matches have at least one goal before the break, therefore the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of ÍBV leading at the break and winning by full-time is the most likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

64Possession (%)36
ÍBVKA
15Shots13
ÍBVKA
5Shots on target5
ÍBVKA
1.72xG1.38
ÍBVKA
5Corners1
ÍBVKA
59Dangerous attacks30
ÍBVKA
13Fouls13
ÍBVKA
5Cards4
ÍBVKA

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.71Goals scored / game1.57
ÍBVKA
2.21Goals allowed / game2.14
ÍBVKA
47%Average possession46%
ÍBVKA
4.07Shots on target / game5.07
ÍBVKA

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.43Shots per game14.71
ÍBVKA
4.07Shots on target5.07
ÍBVKA
15%Shot conversion10.7%
ÍBVKA
47%Possession46%
ÍBVKA
1.33xG for1.68
ÍBVKA
1.57xG against2
ÍBVKA

Shooting quality

ÍBV: Counter-attackingKA: Attacking
ÍBVKA
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

ÍBV is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - ÍBV · 0.6 pts / game - KA

ÍBV
WWDWL
Season result split
29% W21% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-7
1.07 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LLWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
KA
LLLLW
Season result split
29% W7% R64% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-9
0.93 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 2.37BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ÍBV is 9% better for: goals scored per game.

1.71 goals / game - ÍBV · 1.57 goals / game - KA

ÍBV scoring profile: very strong

ÍBV scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 meczów), while KA keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).

KA scoring profile: very strong

KA scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 meczów), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 meczów).

24Goals scored (season)22
ÍBVKA
31Goals conceded (season)30
ÍBVKA
3.93Average goals per game3.71
ÍBVKA
10Goals scored (last 5)10
ÍBVKA
8Goals conceded (last 5)15
ÍBVKA

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal86%
ÍBVKA
43%2 goals50%
ÍBVKA
14%3 goals21%
ÍBVKA
14%4 goals0%
ÍBVKA

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal86%
ÍBVKA
57%2 goals64%
ÍBVKA
21%3 goals43%
ÍBVKA
21%4 goals14%
ÍBVKA

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
ÍBVKA
7%BTTS in both halves14%
ÍBVKA
21%Scored in both halves21%
ÍBVKA

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
ÍBVKA
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ÍBVKA
80%BTTS - last 5100%
ÍBVKA

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
ÍBVKA
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
ÍBVKA
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
ÍBVKA

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
ÍBVKA
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
ÍBVKA
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
ÍBVKA

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ÍBV is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / game - ÍBV · 0.71 pts / game - KA

ÍBV - half-time state
29% leading36% draw36% trailing
KA - half-time state
14% leading29% draw57% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per game (1st half)0.71
ÍBVKA
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.5
ÍBVKA
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)1.14
ÍBVKA
1.71Average goals (1st half)1.64
ÍBVKA
43%Clean sheet before half-time29%
ÍBVKA
50%No goal before half-time64%
ÍBVKA

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per game (2nd half)1.57
ÍBVKA
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)1.07
ÍBVKA
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)1
ÍBVKA
2.21Average goals (2nd half)2.07
ÍBVKA
21%Clean sheet after half-time36%
ÍBVKA
43%No goal after half-time29%
ÍBVKA

ÍBV - second-half results

21% W29% R50% P
17
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KA - second-half results

43% W29% R29% P
10
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

ÍBV - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.60
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game2.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
KA - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.81.2
Goals allowed / game1.41.6
Average goals per game2.22.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

ÍBV
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
7
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
9
46-60
4
4
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

KA
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
8
31-45
3
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.82
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.9 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

ÍBV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.93
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

KA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ÍBVLigaKA
Average goals per game 3.934.05 3.71
Both teams scored 79%75% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%72% 64%
Clean sheets 7%13% 14%
Goal before half-time 79%83% 79%
Goal after half-time 93%89% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.05
Average goals per game
75%
Both teams scored
72%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
13%
Clean sheets
2.17
Home goals / game
1.87
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
15%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
41%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KAYellow cardJeppe Pedersen
  2. ÍBVYellow cardMilan Tomić
  3. KAYellow cardBirgir Baldvinsson
  4. KAYellow cardAndré Rømer
  5. ÍBVRed cardOmar Sowe

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from ÍBV's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses against KA. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.

KA
2 : 0
ÍBV
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
3 : 4
KA Akureyri
KA Akureyri
1 : 0
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
0 : 0
KA Akureyri

FAQ

What was the result of ÍBV vs KA?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished ÍBV 2:2 KA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between ÍBV and KA?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches ÍBV won 0, KA won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before ÍBV vs KA?

ÍBV score 1.71 goals per game on average and KA 1.57. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 79% of ÍBV's matches and 71% of KA's.

What form are ÍBV and KA in?

Over the last 5 games ÍBV have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and KA 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ÍBV vs KA?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.