ÍBV vs Valur: match statistics
ÍBV vs Valur: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
ÍBV play Valur in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match date is 4 July 2026 at 18:00. Venue: Hásteinsvöllur. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
ÍBV: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Valur: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
ÍBV scores 1.71 and concedes 2.21 goals per match. Valur scores 1.60 and concedes 1.93. League average: 4.05 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: ÍBV 79%, Valur 67%. Over 2.5: ÍBV 64%, Valur 67%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 72%.
xG, shots and style
Valur has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.33. ÍBV: 11.4 shots per match, Valur: 13.5.
Match halves
ÍBV: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.93. Valur: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
ÍBV: 76-90+ (5 goals). Valur: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Úrvalsdeild: 4.05 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 72%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 1-0-2. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.
Match description
ÍBV holds a clear form advantage: in the last 5 matches they scored 15 goals (3.0 per match), won 3 and drew 2, averaging 2.2 points per game. Valur over the same period scored only 7 goals (1.4 per match), lost 3 of 5 fixtures and conceded 12 goals (2.4 per match), amounting to just 0.8 points per game. This season ÍBV at home averages 2.0 goals with 10.5 shots and 4.5 on target (conversion 19%), while Valur away attempts more shots (14.33) and has a higher xG (1.64 vs 1.28 for ÍBV) but a lower conversion (14%). Defensively Valur concedes statistically less on the road (1.83 goals per match vs 2.17 for ÍBV at home), however their 12 goals conceded in the last 5 games indicate a drop in defensive form, whereas ÍBV conceded 6 in that span. Considering the markedly superior form, significantly higher goals in the last 5 matches and the home side’s finishing efficiency, I predict an ÍBV win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| ÍBV | Valur | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
ÍBV is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - ÍBV · 0.8 pts / match - Valur
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
ÍBV is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.71 goals / match - ÍBV · 1.6 goals / match - Valur
Valur is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.21 goals / match - ÍBV · 1.93 goals / match - Valur
ÍBV scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Valur keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
Valur scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — ÍBV
Over / Under — Valur
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Valur is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / match - ÍBV · 1.4 pts / match - Valur
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
ÍBV - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Valur - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
ÍBV
Valur
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| ÍBV | Liga | Valur | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.93 | 4.05 | ▼ 3.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 64% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 14% | • 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 79% | 84% | ▲ 87% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): ÍBV 1 - 0 - 2 Valur. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of ÍBV vs Valur?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished ÍBV 1:0 Valur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between ÍBV and Valur?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches ÍBV won 1, Valur won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before ÍBV vs Valur?
ÍBV score 1.71 goals per game on average and Valur 1.60. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 79% of ÍBV's matches and 67% of Valur's.
What form are ÍBV and Valur in?
Over the last 5 games ÍBV have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Valur 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ÍBV vs Valur?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.