Ilves vs Jaro: match statistics
Ilves vs Jaro: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ilves played against Jaro in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on June 17, 2026. Final score: 5:0.
Recent form
Ilves has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Jaro has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Ilves scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.91. Jaro scores 0.91 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Ilves's games and 45% of Jaro's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 55%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Jaro has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.12 per game. Ilves takes 9.1 shots per game, while Jaro takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Ilves leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. Jaro leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.27 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ilves's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Jaro, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Veikkausliiga games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ilves is the clear favorite: over the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals and won 4, averaging 2.4 points per game, while Jaro has only 1 win, 6 goals and 0.6 points per game in the same period. At home Ilves scores 1.2 goals and concedes 1.2, with 60% clean sheets, whereas Jaro averages just 0.33 goals on the road, failed to score in 67% of away matches and concedes 2.17 goals per game. In terms of quality of chances Ilves posts xG 1.1 at home versus Jaro’s xG 1.39 away, but the visitors convert only 3% of shots with 12.33 shots per game on average, while the hosts convert 15% with 8.2 shots, which favors Ilves’ efficiency. Jaro conceded 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 avg) versus Ilves’ 7 conceded (1.4 avg), which together with better form and lower defensive vulnerability points to a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick 'no' (BTTS - No) as the most likely outcome (70% vs 30%) because Jaro averages only 0.33 goals per game across the season and finishes goalless in 67% of matches. Ilves holds a clear offensive edge: 1.6 goals per game, xG 1.52 and 5.0 shots on target per match; in the last 5 games the home side scored 9 goals (avg 1.8). Despite a seasonal xG of 1.39, Jaro has only 10 goals scored, a very low shot conversion rate of 3% and 3.83 shots on target per game — they create chances but rarely finish them. Additionally, Jaro concedes on average 2.17 goals this season and 3.0 goals in the last 5 games (15 conceded), while the league shows a high clean sheet rate of 56% with BTTS 50% — this overall favors a scenario where only one team scores. Considering Ilves is likely to score (xG 1.52, 1.8 goals in the last 5) and Jaro struggles massively with finishing (0.33 seasonally, 3% conversion), I assign 70% to 'no' and 30% to 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate Ilves to score about 1.50 goals (home xG 1.52 and Jaro’s defensive xG 1.48 → average 1.50) and Jaro about 1.30 goals (away xG 1.39 and Ilves’ defensive xG 1.21 → 1.30), giving a total ~2.80 expected goals. With λ=2.80 the Poisson distribution yields roughly a 77% probability of Over 1.5 goals, about 53% for Over 2.5 and about 31% for Over 3.5. Seasonal data confirm a scoring tendency: Ilves averages 1.6 goals, 5.0 shots on target and a 14% conversion rate; Jaro averages 3.83 shots on target, 3% conversion and 0.33 goals per season; meanwhile the percentage of matches Over 1.5 is 80% for Ilves and 83% for Jaro. In the last 5 matches Ilves scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) and conceded 7 (1.4), while Jaro scored 6 (1.2) and conceded 15 (3.0), which further increases goal likelihood. Based on this, the strongest signal from the data is the Over 1.5 bet (selection: Over at the 1.5 line), since the combined xG 2.80 and seasonal Over 1.5 rates (80%/83%) imply a probabilistic edge of about 77%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Ilves is a clear candidate to lead at the break: they were leading at half-time in 60% of matches (3 of 5) and average 1.2 goals by half-time versus Jaro’s 0.17. Additionally, Ilves has an xG of 1.52 versus the visitors’ 1.39, 5.0 shots on target per match compared to 3.83, and a conversion rate of 14% vs 3%, indicating the hosts convert chances into goals more frequently. For the full match Ilves scores 1.6 goals on average and has won 4 of the last 5 matches (80%), while Jaro averages 0.33 goals and has only a 20% win rate in the last 5. Ilves scored at least once by half-time in 100% of home matches, and Jaro led at half-time in only 17% of cases, so combining a 60% chance to lead at the break with an 80% win rate yields roughly a 48% probability for the 1/1 (Half-Time/Full-Time) scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ilves | Jaro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ilves is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Ilves · 0.6 pts / game - Jaro
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ilves is 40% better for: goals scored per game.
1.27 goals / game - Ilves · 0.91 goals / game - Jaro
Ilves is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.91 goals / game - Ilves · 2 goals / game - Jaro
Ilves scores in 91% of games (10 of 11 meczów), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 meczów).
Jaro scores in 55% of games (6 of 11 meczów), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ilves
Over / Under - Jaro
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ilves - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Jaro - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 9%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -10 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ilves
Jaro
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| Ilves | Liga | Jaro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.18 | 2.47 | ▲ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 50% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 42% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 28% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 75% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 75% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ilves's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Jaro. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ilves vs Jaro?
The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 5:0 Jaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ilves and Jaro?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Ilves won 2, Jaro won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs Jaro?
Ilves score 1.27 goals per game on average and Jaro 0.91. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Ilves's matches and 45% of Jaro's.
What form are Ilves and Jaro in?
Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Jaro 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs Jaro?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


