United States - MLS Next ProChase StadiumData current as of 06 August 2026

Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC: match statistics

Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Inter Miami II played Chattanooga FC in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 31 July 2026. Venue: Chase Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Inter Miami II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Chattanooga FC: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Inter Miami II scores 0.89 and concedes 2.56 goals per match. Chattanooga FC scores 1.95 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Inter Miami II 61%, Chattanooga FC 65%. Over 2.5: Inter Miami II 67%, Chattanooga FC 60%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Chattanooga FC has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.38. Inter Miami II: 11.4 shots per match, Chattanooga FC: 13.7.

Match halves

Inter Miami II: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.44. Chattanooga FC: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.95.

Goals by minute

Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). Chattanooga FC: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-3. Average goals 3.40, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chattanooga is the data-based favorite: the visitors average 1.78 goals away with 13 shots and 5.11 shots on target per game and a 14% conversion rate, while Inter Miami II at home averages 1.00 goal, 10 shots and 4.71 on target with a 10% conversion. In the last 5 matches Chattanooga has scored 9 goals and remains unbeaten (2 wins, 3 draws) averaging 1.8 points per match, whereas Inter has only 3 goals, 1 win and 4 losses averaging 0.6 points per match. Defensively the hosts are more vulnerable — Inter concedes 2.14 goals at home on average (46 goals conceded at home this season) with average xG against 1.70, while Chattanooga concedes 2.00 away with xG against 1.60. Additionally, the visitors fail to score less often (11% of matches without a goal versus 29% for Inter), and their higher shot conversion (14% vs 10%) gives them an edge in the quality of chances, so I expect a victory for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Data analysis favors a BTTS scenario: Inter Miami II has a seasonal BTTS rate of 45% and averages 2.09 goals scored and 1.09 conceded per match, while Chattanooga FC has BTTS at 89% and averages 1.78 scored and 2.00 conceded. In the last 5 matches Inter has scored 3 goals total (0.6 per match) and conceded 11 (2.2 per match), whereas Chattanooga has scored 9 (1.8 per match) and conceded 4 (0.8 per match), indicating Inter’s recent defensive issues and Chattanooga’s consistent goal scoring. xG corroborates moderate offensive potential for both sides: Inter posts 1.78 xG per match and allows 1.32 xG, Chattanooga has 1.55 xG and concedes 1.60 xG, so both teams create chances and there is a real likelihood of goals from both teams. Additionally, Chattanooga has 0% clean sheets this season and BTTS occurs in 61% of their league matches; considering the 89% BTTS for the away side and Inter’s weak defense over the last 5 matches, I assign 78% to 'yes' and 22% to 'no', therefore I recommend a 'yes' (BTTS - Yes) bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I back Over 1.5 with a 90% probability: seasonally Inter Miami II scores 2.09 goals and Chattanooga 1.78, and the percentage of matches with over 1.5 goals is 82% (home) and 89% (away) — an average of 85.5%. Additionally, projected xG is 1.69 for the home side and 1.44 for the visitors (total 3.13), which clearly supports at least 2 goals. The 2.5 line moderately favors the over: seasonal Over2.5 is 55% vs 67% and the league’s Over2.5 is 66%, so I assign Over2.5 a 64% probability. At the 3.5 line the signal weakens — seasonal Over3.5 55%/44% (average ~49%), and the combined xG 3.13 is below 3.5, so I rate Over3.5 at 42%. Goal-supporting form: in the last 5 matches Inter Miami II have scored 3 and conceded 11 (0.6 scored and 2.2 conceded), while Chattanooga have 9 scored and 4 conceded (1.8 and 0.8), which further increases the likelihood that both teams will score (45% for the home team vs 89% for the visitors).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Season-long numbers favor Inter Miami II: at home they average 2.09 goals per match and win 64% of games, while Chattanooga wins 22% of matches and concedes 2.00 goals per game on average. However, the last five matches show hosts often start poorly – Inter Miami II were trailing at the break in 60% of their last five fixtures (3 of 5), and Chattanooga led at half-time in 60% of their last five appearances, averaging 0.8 goals by the break. The second half is pivotal: Inter Miami II score on average 1.18 goals after the break and register a second-half goal at home in 100% of matches, whereas Chattanooga concede on average 1.33 goals after the break. Additionally, the visitors are vulnerable in minutes 61–75 – Chattanooga have conceded 7 goals in that interval, and Inter Miami II have scored 5 there, which increases the hosts’ chances of a turnaround after half-time; therefore the HT/FT '2/1' scenario appears most likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
16Shots14
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
6Shots on target6
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
1.91xG1.71
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
2Corners7
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
66Dangerous attacks57
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
12Fouls14
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
1Cards3
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
0.89Goals scored / match1.95
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
2.56Goals conceded / match1.5
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
55%Average possession46%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
4.56Shots on target / match5.65
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.44Shots per match13.7
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
4.56Shots on target5.65
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
7.8%Shot conversion14.2%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
55%Possession46%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
1.38xG for1.68
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
1.86xG against1.45
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

Shooting quality

Inter Miami II: BalancedChattanooga FC: Counter-attacking
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
Accuracy (shots on target)40%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chattanooga FC is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Inter Miami II · 1.8 pts / match - Chattanooga FC

Inter Miami II
LLLLW
Season result split
6% W22% R72% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-13
0.39 pts / match · goal difference -30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Chattanooga FC
DWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W30% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-5
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-3
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chattanooga FC is 119% better for: goals scored per match.

0.89 goals / match - Inter Miami II · 1.95 goals / match - Chattanooga FC

Chattanooga FC is 71% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.56 goals / match - Inter Miami II · 1.5 goals / match - Chattanooga FC

Inter Miami II scoring profile: strong

Inter Miami II scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

Chattanooga FC scoring profile: very strong

Chattanooga FC scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 matches).

16Goals scored (season)39
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
46Goals conceded (season)30
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
3.44Average goals in match3.45
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
3Goals scored (last 5)9
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
11Goals conceded (last 5)4
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal90%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
17%2 goals55%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
6%3 goals30%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
6%4 goals20%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal75%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
67%2 goals40%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
56%3 goals15%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
33%4 goals15%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time25%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
11%BTTS in both halves5%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
17%Scored in both halves35%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time95%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chattanooga FC is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - Inter Miami II · 1.65 pts / match - Chattanooga FC

Inter Miami II - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
Chattanooga FC - half-time state
45% leading30% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)1.65
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
0.44Goals scored (1st half)1
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
1.06Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
28%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
67%No goal before half-time40%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.44Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.95
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.95
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
17%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC
56%No goal after half-time35%
Inter Miami IIChattanooga FC

Inter Miami II - second-half results

6% W28% R67% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding35%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 6%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chattanooga FC - second-half results

45% W15% R40% P
33
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Inter Miami II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-4-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Chattanooga FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Inter Miami II
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
7
16-30
3
8
31-45
3
11
46-60
2
9
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Chattanooga FC
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
10
3
31-45
8
7
46-60
5
8
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Inter Miami II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
49%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
182%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Chattanooga FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
138%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Inter Miami IILigaChattanooga FC
Average goals in match 3.443.23 3.45
Both teams scored 61%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%66% 60%
Clean sheets 6%22% 25%
Goal before half-time 83%75% 75%
Goal after half-time 89%84% 95%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chattanooga FCYellow cardMattias Hanchard
  2. Chattanooga FCGoalAlexander Ian KrehlAssist: Daniel Mangarov
  3. Inter Miami IISubstitutionOn: Jerremy OrtelaOff: Zidane Cadet
  4. Chattanooga FCYellow cardAlexis Leonel Arrúa
  5. Chattanooga FCSubstitutionOn: Anthony SorensonOff: Tate Boswell Robertson
  6. Chattanooga FCYellow cardFarid Sar-Sar Cairo
  7. Inter Miami IIYellow cardJoseph Convers

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Inter Miami II 0 - 2 - 3 Chattanooga FC. Average goals 3.40, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Chattanooga FC
1 : 0
Inter Miami II
Inter Miami II
1 : 2
Chattanooga FC
Chattanooga FC
2 : 2
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Chattanooga FC
3 : 3
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
Club Internacional de Fútbol Miami II
1 : 2
Chattanooga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Inter Miami II 0:1 Chattanooga FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter Miami II and Chattanooga FC?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Inter Miami II won 0, Chattanooga FC won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC?

Inter Miami II score 0.89 goals per game on average and Chattanooga FC 1.95. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Inter Miami II's matches and 65% of Chattanooga FC's.

What form are Inter Miami II and Chattanooga FC in?

Over the last 5 games Inter Miami II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Chattanooga FC 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.