Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC: match statistics
Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Inter Miami II played Chattanooga FC in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 31 July 2026. Venue: Chase Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Inter Miami II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Chattanooga FC: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Inter Miami II scores 0.89 and concedes 2.56 goals per match. Chattanooga FC scores 1.95 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.23 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Inter Miami II 61%, Chattanooga FC 65%. Over 2.5: Inter Miami II 67%, Chattanooga FC 60%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Chattanooga FC has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.38. Inter Miami II: 11.4 shots per match, Chattanooga FC: 13.7.
Match halves
Inter Miami II: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.44. Chattanooga FC: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.95.
Goals by minute
Inter Miami II: 0-15 (3 goals). Chattanooga FC: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-3. Average goals 3.40, BTTS 80%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chattanooga is the data-based favorite: the visitors average 1.78 goals away with 13 shots and 5.11 shots on target per game and a 14% conversion rate, while Inter Miami II at home averages 1.00 goal, 10 shots and 4.71 on target with a 10% conversion. In the last 5 matches Chattanooga has scored 9 goals and remains unbeaten (2 wins, 3 draws) averaging 1.8 points per match, whereas Inter has only 3 goals, 1 win and 4 losses averaging 0.6 points per match. Defensively the hosts are more vulnerable — Inter concedes 2.14 goals at home on average (46 goals conceded at home this season) with average xG against 1.70, while Chattanooga concedes 2.00 away with xG against 1.60. Additionally, the visitors fail to score less often (11% of matches without a goal versus 29% for Inter), and their higher shot conversion (14% vs 10%) gives them an edge in the quality of chances, so I expect a victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis favors a BTTS scenario: Inter Miami II has a seasonal BTTS rate of 45% and averages 2.09 goals scored and 1.09 conceded per match, while Chattanooga FC has BTTS at 89% and averages 1.78 scored and 2.00 conceded. In the last 5 matches Inter has scored 3 goals total (0.6 per match) and conceded 11 (2.2 per match), whereas Chattanooga has scored 9 (1.8 per match) and conceded 4 (0.8 per match), indicating Inter’s recent defensive issues and Chattanooga’s consistent goal scoring. xG corroborates moderate offensive potential for both sides: Inter posts 1.78 xG per match and allows 1.32 xG, Chattanooga has 1.55 xG and concedes 1.60 xG, so both teams create chances and there is a real likelihood of goals from both teams. Additionally, Chattanooga has 0% clean sheets this season and BTTS occurs in 61% of their league matches; considering the 89% BTTS for the away side and Inter’s weak defense over the last 5 matches, I assign 78% to 'yes' and 22% to 'no', therefore I recommend a 'yes' (BTTS - Yes) bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I back Over 1.5 with a 90% probability: seasonally Inter Miami II scores 2.09 goals and Chattanooga 1.78, and the percentage of matches with over 1.5 goals is 82% (home) and 89% (away) — an average of 85.5%. Additionally, projected xG is 1.69 for the home side and 1.44 for the visitors (total 3.13), which clearly supports at least 2 goals. The 2.5 line moderately favors the over: seasonal Over2.5 is 55% vs 67% and the league’s Over2.5 is 66%, so I assign Over2.5 a 64% probability. At the 3.5 line the signal weakens — seasonal Over3.5 55%/44% (average ~49%), and the combined xG 3.13 is below 3.5, so I rate Over3.5 at 42%. Goal-supporting form: in the last 5 matches Inter Miami II have scored 3 and conceded 11 (0.6 scored and 2.2 conceded), while Chattanooga have 9 scored and 4 conceded (1.8 and 0.8), which further increases the likelihood that both teams will score (45% for the home team vs 89% for the visitors).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Season-long numbers favor Inter Miami II: at home they average 2.09 goals per match and win 64% of games, while Chattanooga wins 22% of matches and concedes 2.00 goals per game on average. However, the last five matches show hosts often start poorly – Inter Miami II were trailing at the break in 60% of their last five fixtures (3 of 5), and Chattanooga led at half-time in 60% of their last five appearances, averaging 0.8 goals by the break. The second half is pivotal: Inter Miami II score on average 1.18 goals after the break and register a second-half goal at home in 100% of matches, whereas Chattanooga concede on average 1.33 goals after the break. Additionally, the visitors are vulnerable in minutes 61–75 – Chattanooga have conceded 7 goals in that interval, and Inter Miami II have scored 5 there, which increases the hosts’ chances of a turnaround after half-time; therefore the HT/FT '2/1' scenario appears most likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Inter Miami II | Chattanooga FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chattanooga FC is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Inter Miami II · 1.8 pts / match - Chattanooga FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga FC is 119% better for: goals scored per match.
0.89 goals / match - Inter Miami II · 1.95 goals / match - Chattanooga FC
Chattanooga FC is 71% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.56 goals / match - Inter Miami II · 1.5 goals / match - Chattanooga FC
Inter Miami II scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Chattanooga FC keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
Chattanooga FC scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Inter Miami II keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Inter Miami II
Over / Under — Chattanooga FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chattanooga FC is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.83 pts / match - Inter Miami II · 1.65 pts / match - Chattanooga FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Inter Miami II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 6%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chattanooga FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Inter Miami II
Chattanooga FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Inter Miami II | Liga | Chattanooga FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.44 | 3.23 | ▲ 3.45 |
| Both teams scored | • 61% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 67% | 66% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 22% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 75% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 84% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Inter Miami IISubstitutionOn: Jerremy OrtelaOff: Zidane Cadet
- Chattanooga FCYellow cardAlexis Leonel Arrúa
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Inter Miami II 0 - 2 - 3 Chattanooga FC. Average goals 3.40, both teams scored in 80% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Inter Miami II 0:1 Chattanooga FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Inter Miami II and Chattanooga FC?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Inter Miami II won 0, Chattanooga FC won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC?
Inter Miami II score 0.89 goals per game on average and Chattanooga FC 1.95. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Inter Miami II's matches and 65% of Chattanooga FC's.
What form are Inter Miami II and Chattanooga FC in?
Over the last 5 games Inter Miami II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Chattanooga FC 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter Miami II vs Chattanooga FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


