El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of September 20, 2026

Inter vs FAS: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
2 : 2half-time 1:2
FAS crest
FAS

Inter vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Inter played against FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on September 17, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Inter has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. FAS has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Inter scores 1.56 goals per game and allows 0.67. FAS scores 1.75 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 22% of Inter's games and 50% of FAS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 50%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FAS has the higher season xG average, 1.87 to 1.51 per game. Inter takes 7.6 shots per game, while FAS takes 12.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Inter leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.11 goals per game after halftime. FAS leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Inter's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For FAS, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter are in excellent current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 10 goals and averaging 2.4 points per game, while FAS have recorded 3 wins and scored 6 goals during the same period. At home, the hosts are unbeaten, winning 67% of their matches and conceding just 0.33 goals per game, whereas FAS lose as many as 50% of their away matches and concede an average of 1 goal. The visitors do create more high-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.93 compared with Inter’s 1.46, but their conversion rate is only 13%, compared with 21% for the hosts. Inter register fewer shots on target, 5.33 versus 10, but are significantly more clinical in front of goal and keep a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches. The hosts’ advantage in defense, finishing efficiency and recent results gives them a slightly greater chance of winning, although FAS’s attacking potential increases the risk of a draw or a goal for the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Although Inter’s seasonal BTTS rate stands at 75%, the current trend is significantly lower: only 20% of their last 5 matches featured goals from both sides. FAS also provides no strong indication of a goal at both ends, with a seasonal BTTS rate of just 25% and 40% across their last 5 matches, while conceding an average of 0.8 goals. Inter have recently averaged 2.0 goals per match, but FAS have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their seasonal fixtures, which materially increases the likelihood that the hosts will fail to breach their defense or that the visitors will remain scoreless. The hosts have conceded only 0.8 goals per match in their five most recent outings, while FAS have scored 1.2 goals during this period. Therefore, the most likely outcome is BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Inter score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while FAS average 1.5 goals away, providing a solid foundation for exceeding two goals in the match. Both teams regularly create chances: their average xG stands at 1.82 for Inter and 1.93 for FAS, although FAS’s recent form has lowered their scoring average to 1.2 goals per match. The 1.5-goal line was covered in 75% of matches for both teams, while the 2.5-goal threshold landed in exactly 50% of their games, so the higher line does not offer the same clear advantage. Inter have scored 10 goals in their last five appearances, while FAS have conceded 4 over the same period; therefore, Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick with a projected total of 2.75 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as both teams have been level after 45 minutes in 50% of their matches, while FAS have done so in as many as 80% of their last five games. Inter have been unimpressive before the break recently, averaging just 0.4 goals scored, whereas FAS conceded only 0.2 goals per match during that period. After the interval, however, the advantage should shift to the hosts: in their last five appearances, Inter averaged 1.6 goals scored in the second half and conceded just 0.2, compared with FAS’s 0.4 goals scored and 0.6 conceded. Inter also have a clearly stronger season record, winning 75% of their matches and averaging 2.0 goals, compared with FAS’s 50% win rate and 1.5 goals per game. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by an Inter win best combines a cautious start with the hosts’ stronger finish.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
InterFAS
9Shots12
InterFAS
6Shots on target5
InterFAS
1.61xG1.67
InterFAS
8Corners2
InterFAS
85Dangerous attacks78
InterFAS
9Fouls13
InterFAS
0Cards0
InterFAS

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.56Goals scored / game1.75
InterFAS
0.67Goals allowed / game0.88
InterFAS
54%Average possession56%
InterFAS
4Shots on target / game8
InterFAS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.56Shots per game12.75
InterFAS
4Shots on target8
InterFAS
20.6%Shot conversion13.7%
InterFAS
54%Possession56%
InterFAS
1.51xG for1.87
InterFAS
1.59xG against1.52
InterFAS

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingFAS: Efficient finishing
InterFAS
Accuracy (shots on target)53%63%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Inter is 20% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Inter · 2 pts / game - FAS

Inter
WWWLW
Season result split
56% W33% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
DWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
FAS
DLWWW
Season result split
63% W13% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-2
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-2
Last 5 away
2-0-2
LWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FAS is 12% better for: goals scored per game.

1.56 goals / game - Inter · 1.75 goals / game - FAS

Inter is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.67 goals / game - Inter · 0.88 goals / game - FAS

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).

FAS scoring profile: mixed

FAS scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 games), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 games).

14Goals scored (season)14
InterFAS
6Goals conceded (season)7
InterFAS
2.22Average goals per game2.63
InterFAS
10Goals scored (last 5)7
InterFAS
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
InterFAS

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal88%
InterFAS
56%2 goals38%
InterFAS
22%3 goals38%
InterFAS
11%4 goals13%
InterFAS

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal63%
InterFAS
22%2 goals25%
InterFAS
11%3 goals0%
InterFAS
0%4 goals0%
InterFAS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time13%
InterFAS
0%BTTS in both halves0%
InterFAS
33%Scored in both halves13%
InterFAS

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
InterFAS
22%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
InterFAS
20%BTTS - last 560%
InterFAS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
InterFAS
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
InterFAS
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
InterFAS

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
InterFAS
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
InterFAS
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
InterFAS

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / game - Inter · 1.25 pts / game - FAS

Inter - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing
FAS - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per game (1st half)1.25
InterFAS
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.75
InterFAS
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
InterFAS
1Average goals (1st half)1.25
InterFAS
78%Clean sheet before half-time63%
InterFAS
56%No goal before half-time63%
InterFAS

After half-time (2nd half)

2.11Points per game (2nd half)1.75
InterFAS
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)1
InterFAS
0.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
InterFAS
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.38
InterFAS
89%Clean sheet after half-time75%
InterFAS
44%No goal after half-time38%
InterFAS

Inter - second-half results

56% W44% D0% L
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding170%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FAS - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding252%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Inter - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.20
Goals scored / game0.41.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
FAS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Inter
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
2
31-45
5
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

FAS
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.43
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

FAS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.64
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaFAS
Average goals per game 2.222.53 2.63
Both teams scored 22%47% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%45% 50%
Clean sheets 67%33% 38%
Goal before half-time 56%62% 63%
Goal after half-time 56%73% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Luis Enrique Vásquez⚽ 1
Yoserth Hernández⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Melvin Urbina⚽ 1
Yan Dos Santos Maciel⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FASGoalYan Dos Santos Maciel
  2. FASGoalMelvin Urbina
  3. InterGoalLuis Enrique Vásquez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Inter's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses against FAS. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 75% of them.

Inter
2 : 2
FAS
FAS
3 : 1
Inter
Inter
0 : 2
FAS
FAS
3 : 1
Inter

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs FAS?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:2 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter and FAS?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, FAS won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs FAS?

Inter score 1.56 goals per game on average and FAS 1.75. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Inter's matches and 50% of FAS's.

What form are Inter and FAS in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and FAS 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs FAS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.