Egypt - Second DivisionIsmaïlia StadiumData current as of October 15, 2026

Ismaily SC vs Tanta SC: match statistics

Ismaily SC crest
Ismaily SC
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC

Ismaily SC vs Tanta SC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ismaily SC played against Tanta SC in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on October 9, 2026. Venue: Ismaïlia Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Ismaily SC has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Tanta SC has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Ismaily SC scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 1.86. Tanta SC scores 0.57 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 86% of Ismaily SC's games and 29% of Tanta SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 29%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ismaily SC has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.15 per game. Ismaily SC takes 6.4 shots per game, while Tanta SC takes 7.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Ismaily SC leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Tanta SC leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.29 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ismaily SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Tanta SC, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 2.24 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

A draw looks the most likely outcome, as neither side has won at home or away so far, while 67% of Tanta SC’s away matches have ended level. Ismaily SC average 0.67 goals scored and 2 conceded at home, but the visitors score just 0.33 goals per away game and have failed to find the net in 67% of those matches. Tanta SC’s defense looks more solid: they have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their away games and concede an average of 1 goal, although opponents create chances worth 1.07 xG against them. In their last five league matches, the hosts have scored 7 goals but conceded 8, while the visitors have managed just 2 goals and conceded 5. These figures point to a closely contested match in which both teams’ lack of cutting edge could outweigh the hosts’ defensive frailties.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to at least one team failing to score: Tanta averages just 0.33 goals per match and failed to find the net in 67% of its matches. In their last 5 matches, the visitors scored only 2 goals, and both teams scored in just 20% of those games. Ismaily has the higher xG, 1.21 compared with its opponent's 1.03, but failed to score in 50% of its matches, while Tanta kept a clean sheet in 67% of its games. Although Ismaily recorded BTTS in 80% of its last 5 matches and conceded an average of 1.6 goals, the visitors' poor finishing and the teams' season BTTS rates of 25% and 33% offer stronger support for BTTS - No: at least one team is expected not to score, which does not necessarily mean a 0-0 result.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Ismaily average 0.75 goals per match this season, while Tanta average just 0.33, limiting both teams’ scoring potential. Over their last five games, the hosts have averaged 1.4 goals, compared with just 0.4 for the visitors; in addition, Tanta have failed to score in 67% of their matches. Under 3.5 goals has landed in all of Ismaily’s matches and 67% of Tanta’s, although the small sample sizes make these percentages less reliable. The league average is 2.21 goals, while the forecast for this match is 1.85, making Under 3.5 the strongest signal among the lines considered.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Tanta were level at the break in all three of their away matches so far, while Ismaily have averaged just 0.25 goals before half-time at home. Both teams’ poor scoring records favor the draw holding, with the hosts averaging 0.75 goals per home match and the visitors 0.33 per away match. Tanta drew two of their three away matches and failed to score in the second half, strengthening the X/X scenario. X/1 remains an alternative, as Ismaily average 0.5 goals after the break, while Tanta concede 0.67 goals in that period. However, with Tanta keeping a clean sheet in 67% of their away matches, I rate the draw at full-time slightly higher than a home win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
Ismaily SCTanta SC
9Shots12
Ismaily SCTanta SC
4Shots on target6
Ismaily SCTanta SC
0xG0
Ismaily SCTanta SC
-1Corners-1
Ismaily SCTanta SC
0Dangerous attacks0
Ismaily SCTanta SC
-1Fouls-1
Ismaily SCTanta SC
-1Cards-1
Ismaily SCTanta SC

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Ismaily SCTanta SC
1.29Goals scored / game0.57
Ismaily SCTanta SC
1.86Goals allowed / game1
Ismaily SCTanta SC
35%Average possession49%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
2.29Shots on target / game2.71
Ismaily SCTanta SC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.43Shots per game7.43
Ismaily SCTanta SC
2.29Shots on target2.71
Ismaily SCTanta SC
20%Shot conversion7.7%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
35%Possession49%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
1.8xG for1.15
Ismaily SCTanta SC
1.03xG against1.34
Ismaily SCTanta SC

Shooting quality

Ismaily SC: Counter-attackingTanta SC: Balanced
Ismaily SCTanta SC
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.280.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.560.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ismaily SC is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Ismaily SC · 0.8 pts / game - Tanta SC

Ismaily SC
DDLWD
Season result split
14% W43% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-3
0.86 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 at home
0-1-2
LDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Tanta SC
LLWDL
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
DLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.71Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ismaily SC is 126% better for: goals scored per game.

1.29 goals / game - Ismaily SC · 0.57 goals / game - Tanta SC

Tanta SC is 86% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.86 goals / game - Ismaily SC · 1 goals / game - Tanta SC

Ismaily SC scoring profile: strong

Ismaily SC scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 games).

Tanta SC scoring profile: strong

Tanta SC scores in 43% of games (3 of 7 games), while Ismaily SC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 games).

9Goals scored (season)4
Ismaily SCTanta SC
13Goals conceded (season)7
Ismaily SCTanta SC
3.14Average goals per game1.57
Ismaily SCTanta SC
7Goals scored (last 5)2
Ismaily SCTanta SC
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
Ismaily SCTanta SC

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal43%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
29%2 goals14%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
14%3 goals0%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
0%4 goals0%
Ismaily SCTanta SC

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal57%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
71%2 goals29%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
14%3 goals14%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
0%4 goals0%
Ismaily SCTanta SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time14%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
29%BTTS in both halves0%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
29%Scored in both halves0%
Ismaily SCTanta SC

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
80%BTTS - last 520%
Ismaily SCTanta SC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Ismaily SCTanta SC

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time43%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Ismaily SCTanta SC

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ismaily SC is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / game - Ismaily SC · 1 pts / game - Tanta SC

Ismaily SC - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing
Tanta SC - half-time state
14% leading57% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per game (1st half)1
Ismaily SCTanta SC
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.29
Ismaily SCTanta SC
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Ismaily SCTanta SC
1.43Average goals (1st half)0.71
Ismaily SCTanta SC
29%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
43%No goal before half-time71%
Ismaily SCTanta SC

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1
Ismaily SCTanta SC
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
Ismaily SCTanta SC
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Ismaily SCTanta SC
1.71Average goals (2nd half)0.86
Ismaily SCTanta SC
14%Clean sheet after half-time71%
Ismaily SCTanta SC
43%No goal after half-time86%
Ismaily SCTanta SC

Ismaily SC - second-half results

29% W14% D57% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Tanta SC - second-half results

14% W57% D29% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ismaily SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Tanta SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.60
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.80.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ismaily SC
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
5
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.36
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ismaily SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.51
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.83
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
192%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Ismaily SCLigaTanta SC
Average goals per game▲ 3.142.24▼ 1.57
Both teams scored▲ 86%48%▼ 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 57%39%▼ 29%
Clean sheets▼ 0%31%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%60%▼ 57%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%76%▼ 43%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.24
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / game
0.97
Away goals / game
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Ismaily SC vs Tanta SC?

The Second Division match finished Ismaily SC 2:1 Tanta SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ismaily SC vs Tanta SC?

Ismaily SC score 1.29 goals per game on average and Tanta SC 0.57. The Second Division average is 2.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 86% of Ismaily SC's matches and 29% of Tanta SC's.

What form are Ismaily SC and Tanta SC in?

Over the last 5 games Ismaily SC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Tanta SC 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ismaily SC vs Tanta SC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ismaily SC vs Tanta SC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.