İstanbulspor vs Adana Demirspor: match statistics
İstanbulspor vs Adana Demirspor: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
İstanbulspor played against Adana Demirspor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on May 1, 2026. Final score: 8:1.
Recent form
İstanbulspor has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Adana Demirspor has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
İstanbulspor scores 1.32 goals per game and allows 1.46. Adana Demirspor scores 0.57 and allows 4.35. Games in this league average 2.92 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of İstanbulspor's games and 41% of Adana Demirspor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 95%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
İstanbulspor has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 0.74 per game. İstanbulspor takes 11.5 shots per game, while Adana Demirspor takes 6.3.
First-half and second-half trends
İstanbulspor leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.78 goals per game after halftime. Adana Demirspor leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
İstanbulspor's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Adana Demirspor, it is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.92 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites are the hosts İstanbulspor: they average 1.33 goals per home match, while Adana Demirspor scores only 0.28 on the road. Defensively the hosts have an overwhelming advantage — Adana concedes an average of 4.44 goals away and have 161 goals conceded this season, versus İstanbulspor’s 1.44 conceded in home matches and 54 overall. İstanbulspor generates significantly more chances (12.44 average shots and 4.5 on target per home match) and has an average xG of 1.40 per game, while Adana records 4.89 shots (1.89 on target) and xG 0.60 away. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 11 goals and average 2 points per game (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss); the visitors scored 4, conceded 20 and average 0.6 points per game; additionally Adana have not won away all season (0% away wins) and fail to score away in 78% of matches. Based on these figures I expect a home win, assigning it roughly an 80% probability, a draw 12% and an away win 8%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Adana Demirspor exhibits a weak offense: seasonal goals per game 0.28 and only 4 goals in the last 5 matches (0.8 avg), with a season BTTS rate of just 22%, strongly indicating the visitors often fail to score. İstanbulspor shows better short-term attacking form — 11 goals in the last 5 matches (2.2 avg), 3.05 shots on target and 80% of the last five matches with BTTS; their last 5 matches show xG 1.2 on average versus opponents' xG 1.65. Both teams, however, are defensively vulnerable: Adana concedes 4.44 goals per match on the season and 20 goals in the last 5 (4.0 avg), while İstanbulspor concedes 4.26 goals per match season-to-date, which favors high-scoring margins (e.g. 0–3). Adana’s shot stats (avg 4.89 shots, 1.89 on target, 6% conversion) and low seasonal xG 0.6 further reduce the likelihood that the visitors will score. Therefore I forecast 65% for No BTTS ("no") and 35% for BTTS ("yes") — the strongest signal is Adana’s low efficiency and the fact that 72% of their over2.5 matches finish without BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Calculated xG per match is 1.64 for İstanbulspor and 1.43 for Adana Demirspor (average of xG_for and xG_against), totaling 3.07 xG, which indicates high goal potential. Seasonal stats confirm this trend: home team has Over 1.5 in 100% of matches and Over 2.5 in 95%, while the visitors have Over 1.5 in 94% and Over 2.5 in 94%. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 11 goals (2.2 avg), whereas the visitors conceded 20 goals (4.0 avg), increasing the likelihood of multiple goals. The hosts average 3.05 shots on target with an 11% conversion, the visitors 1.89 on target with a 6% conversion, so the shooting advantage should translate into goals. Based on this I recommend betting Over 1.5 (strongest signal); I rate Over 1.5 at ~98%, Over 2.5 at ~92% and Over 3.5 at ~75%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side are clearly superior in form and attack: over the last 5 matches they have a 60% win rate compared to the visitors' 20% and score an average of 2.2 goals per game versus the visitors' 0.8. At Half-Time a draw appears most common — the home team recorded a lead at the break as a draw in 80% of their last 5 matches, while the visitors did so in 40%, with average goals at Half-Time 0.6–0.6. The home side also create more chances (xG 0.86 vs 0.6, 7.58 shots vs 4.89 and 3.05 shots on target vs 1.89), which increases their likelihood of scoring decisive goals after the break. The visitors have defensive issues in the short term — conceding an average of 4.0 goals in their last 5 matches — so the safest scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time; I back X/1 (27%), then X/X (24%) and 1/1 (16%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| İstanbulspor | Adana Demirspor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
İstanbulspor is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - İstanbulspor · 0.6 pts / game - Adana Demirspor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
İstanbulspor is 132% better for: goals scored per game.
1.32 goals / game - İstanbulspor · 0.57 goals / game - Adana Demirspor
İstanbulspor is 198% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.46 goals / game - İstanbulspor · 4.35 goals / game - Adana Demirspor
İstanbulspor scores in 65% of games (24 of 37 meczów), while Adana Demirspor keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 37 meczów).
Adana Demirspor scores in 41% of games (15 of 37 meczów), while İstanbulspor keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - İstanbulspor
Over / Under - Adana Demirspor
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
İstanbulspor is 442% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / game - İstanbulspor · 0.19 pts / game - Adana Demirspor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
İstanbulspor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Adana Demirspor - second-half results
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -11 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (45). Late-goal balance (76-90): -40 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
İstanbulspor
Adana Demirspor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| İstanbulspor | Liga | Adana Demirspor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.78 | 2.92 | ▲ 4.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 50% | ▼ 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 54% | ▲ 95% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 29% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 71% | ▲ 95% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from İstanbulspor's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Adana Demirspor. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of İstanbulspor vs Adana Demirspor?
The 1. Lig match finished İstanbulspor 8:1 Adana Demirspor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before İstanbulspor vs Adana Demirspor?
İstanbulspor score 1.32 goals per game on average and Adana Demirspor 0.57. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 54% of İstanbulspor's matches and 41% of Adana Demirspor's.
What form are İstanbulspor and Adana Demirspor in?
Over the last 5 games İstanbulspor have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Adana Demirspor 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for İstanbulspor vs Adana Demirspor?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


