İstanbulspor vs Amed: match statistics
Amed shows a distinctly better form and league position (3rd place) compared to İstanbulspor (13th place). The visitors have scored 59 goals this season while conceding 32, resulting in a +27 goal difference, whereas the hosts hold a modest 37:42 record. In their last five matches, Amed remains undefeated (2 wins, 3 draws) with a 6:4 goal ratio, while İstanbulspor has won only once, conceding 7 goals. Although the hosts possess a decent home record (50% draw rate), Amed boasts better xG statistics (1.46 vs 1.40) and higher shooting efficiency (14% vs 12% shot conversion). Considering the clear quality advantage and form of the visitors, their triumph is the most probable outcome, although İstanbulspor's solid percentage of home draws makes sharing the points a realistic possibility as well.
İstanbulspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
İstanbulspor played against Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on March 11, 2026. Final score: 0:4.
Recent form
İstanbulspor has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Amed has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
İstanbulspor scores 1.28 goals per game and allows 1.45. Amed scores 2.03 and allows 1.10. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of İstanbulspor's games and 55% of Amed's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 59%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.31 per game. İstanbulspor takes 11.6 shots per game, while Amed takes 15.0.
First-half and second-half trends
İstanbulspor leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.72 goals per game after halftime. Amed leads at halftime in 45% and scores 1.10 after halftime.
When the teams score
İstanbulspor's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Amed, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Amed shows a distinctly better form and league position (3rd place) compared to İstanbulspor (13th place). The visitors have scored 59 goals this season while conceding 32, resulting in a +27 goal difference, whereas the hosts hold a modest 37:42 record. In their last five matches, Amed remains undefeated (2 wins, 3 draws) with a 6:4 goal ratio, while İstanbulspor has won only once, conceding 7 goals. Although the hosts possess a decent home record (50% draw rate), Amed boasts better xG statistics (1.46 vs 1.40) and higher shooting efficiency (14% vs 12% shot conversion). Considering the clear quality advantage and form of the visitors, their triumph is the most probable outcome, although İstanbulspor's solid percentage of home draws makes sharing the points a realistic possibility as well.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| İstanbulspor | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - İstanbulspor · 1.8 pts / game - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 59% better for: goals scored per game.
1.28 goals / game - İstanbulspor · 2.03 goals / game - Amed
Amed is 32% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.45 goals / game - İstanbulspor · 1.1 goals / game - Amed
İstanbulspor scores in 66% of games (19 of 29 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 meczów).
Amed scores in 83% of games (24 of 29 meczów), while İstanbulspor keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - İstanbulspor
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / game - İstanbulspor · 1.76 pts / game - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
İstanbulspor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
İstanbulspor
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| İstanbulspor | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.72 | 2.97 | ▲ 3.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 50% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 55% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 28% | ▲ 34% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 72% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 66% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from İstanbulspor's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Amed. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of İstanbulspor vs Amed?
The 1. Lig match finished İstanbulspor 0:4 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before İstanbulspor vs Amed?
İstanbulspor score 1.28 goals per game on average and Amed 2.03. The 1. Lig average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 52% of İstanbulspor's matches and 55% of Amed's.
What form are İstanbulspor and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games İstanbulspor have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Amed 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for İstanbulspor vs Amed?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for İstanbulspor vs Amed: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.