Morocco - Botola ProGrand Stade de TangerData current as of 18 July 2026

Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour: match statistics

Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ittihad Tanger play Yacoub El Mansour in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 14 June 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Grand Stade de Tanger. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Ittihad Tanger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Yacoub El Mansour: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Yacoub El Mansour scores 1.13 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ittihad Tanger 53%, Yacoub El Mansour 73%. Over 2.5: Ittihad Tanger 27%, Yacoub El Mansour 57%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Ittihad Tanger: 10.4 shots per match, Yacoub El Mansour: 10.2.

Match halves

Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57. Yacoub El Mansour: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (9 goals). Yacoub El Mansour: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict a draw (X): Ittihad Tanger records as many as 64% draws at home, while Yacoub El Mansour draws 36% of their away matches, increasing the likelihood of a shared point. In the last 5 matches Ittihad has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (avg. 1.6 points per game), whereas Yacoub has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses (avg. 1.0 point), so the hosts are in better form. In terms of goals, Ittihad at home scores 0.82 and concedes 1.00 with xG 1.29 for and 1.38 against, while the visitors away score 0.91 and concede 1.55 with xG 1.20/1.13, which suggests the hosts defend better than xG indicates and the visitors have defensive issues. The visitors register more shots on target (3.27 vs 2.82) and have a higher shot conversion rate (10% vs 8%), but the hosts attempt more shots overall (10.82 vs 9.09) and are less likely to finish a match goalless (27% vs 36%), which favors a low-scoring draw as the most probable scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
12Shots11
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
4Shots on target4
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
1.32xG1.38
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
3Corners9
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
39Dangerous attacks56
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
13Fouls15
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
4Cards5
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0.9Goals scored / match1.13
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
1.03Goals conceded / match1.47
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
49%Average possession54%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
3.27Shots on target / match3.53
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.4Shots per match10.23
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
3.27Shots on target3.53
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
8.7%Shot conversion11.1%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
49%Possession54%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
1.3xG for1.3
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
1.48xG against1.11
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

Shooting quality

Ittihad Tanger: BalancedYacoub El Mansour: Balanced
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
Accuracy (shots on target)31%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Yacoub El Mansour is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 2 pts / match - Yacoub El Mansour

Ittihad Tanger
WLDLW
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Yacoub El Mansour
WWLDW
Season result split
23% W30% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-14
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 0.93BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Yacoub El Mansour is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.13 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour

Ittihad Tanger is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.47 goals / match - Yacoub El Mansour

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: very strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Yacoub El Mansour keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

Yacoub El Mansour scoring profile: very strong

Yacoub El Mansour scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

27Goals scored (season)34
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
31Goals conceded (season)44
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
1.93Average goals in match2.6
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal83%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
23%2 goals27%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0%3 goals3%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal87%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
20%2 goals50%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
3%3 goals10%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

73%
Yacoub El Mansour - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.22 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time30%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
10%Scored in both halves13%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
40%BTTS - last 560%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing
Yacoub El Mansour - half-time state
20% leading43% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.03
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.9
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.43
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
57%Clean sheet before half-time43%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
70%No goal before half-time50%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.17
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
53%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour
53%No goal after half-time53%
Ittihad TangerYacoub El Mansour

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Yacoub El Mansour - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
31
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Yacoub El Mansour - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match2.00.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Yacoub El Mansour
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
5
10
16-30
8
12
31-45
6
5
46-60
7
3
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Yacoub El Mansour

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Ittihad TangerLigaYacoub El Mansour
Average goals in match 1.932.17 2.60
Both teams scored 53%52% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%38% 57%
Clean sheets 20%30% 13%
Goal before half-time 63%63% 77%
Goal after half-time 73%73% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ittihad Tanger 1 - 0 - 0 Yacoub El Mansour. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour?

The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 2:1 Yacoub El Mansour. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour?

Ittihad Tanger score 0.90 goals per game on average and Yacoub El Mansour 1.13. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 73% of Yacoub El Mansour's.

What form are Ittihad Tanger and Yacoub El Mansour in?

Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Yacoub El Mansour 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ittihad Tanger vs Yacoub El Mansour: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.